Because I have one of my degrees in meteorology and worked in the field for a few years. The data being used today isn't the same as it was 25 years ago, let alone 50-100 years ago. I've had discussions on here before and not one of the so called "experts" on here can even answer basic meteorology questions. What is going on is urban sprawl not CO2 issues. The atmosphere above ground levels isn't' changing at all.
It was debunked and never happened.
When schools started getting extra funding for teaching it.
Everything climate change is about money!
You're the guy that would be pontificating about how the Titanic was not actually sinking right up to the point when the ship snapped in half and came crashing down on top of you.
We have not heard any of those things from "respected scientists". You have just heard media people with an agenda claim those things and you took them at their word. While there were some random articles and maybe a few studies that would also say those things those papers were resoundingly rejected by the consensus of studies and scientists. While Climate change isn't the reason every single event happens, it is the reason they are happening far more frequently and with increased intensity.
So none of these people mentioned here were respected scientist or publications? Just admit that a lot of the climate change narrative has been fear mongering and poor guesswork by people that we are supposed to believe.
GLOBALISTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why, because you don't agree with things I say? Chat me, I'll ask you questions about basic meteorology and I can guarantee you can't answer. But you'll spout things about none of which is true because you saw it or read it from someone who bases everything off funding to keep the lie alive.
Proposing to remove climate change from educational standards is an anti-education tactic to push a very profitable agenda.
Thought it posted it was getting rid of the term climate change? Nothing about hiding the science classroom or lab.
Nice, if you know nothing about it, how can you make a judgement about what I've said.
ISU is doing groundbreaking work in the effects of climate change in agriculture. This will benefit Iowa’s farmers.
Well, their work was rejected by the greater scientific community. I guess the term respected depends on how they dealt with that. Again, science is done by consensus, not individuals.
The GQP doesn’t care about keeping educated workers. They don’t care about keeping young people. They don’t want a bunch of queers hanging around Iowa, either. They want ideologically pure drones.
No, we can research it. Just need to stop thinking man is responsible for climate change. The climate will continue to change like it has for millions of years.
lol.
Check the 850mb and the 700mb levels and tell me what's going on. the 850mb level would be getting closer to surface if it was warming or getting higher if it was cooling. None of the levels shows any change from the past. The inversions from those levels tell whether fronts and troughs are present.
They are removing climate change, not science.
Exactly, study science and not ideology.
I've never seen this. Maybe people have different opinions of whether it's a thing or not. I bet if you follow the money, you'll get the answer to who believes it and who doesn't.
Or sky-high homeowner insurance rates which are 100% related to climate change.
What exactly is your theory on water vapor here?
I'm basing this on anecdotal evidence. Different interviews and articles over time.
