ADVERTISEMENT

Protect all babies, but not those babies

I think it's safe to say he has a very blunted sense of empathy towards those actual living and breathing children which stands in sharp contrast to his highly emotional and overly protective stance towards clusters of undifferentiated cells, that he endearingly (and wrongly) refers to as "babies".
I will ask you the same question, how much time and money have my wife and I given to children and their charities
 
That's an odd interpretation of Section 1 of the 14th amendment which does not speak to any characteristics nor the legal status of the natural born citizen's parents.

Important to note, the language of Section 1 begins with two very simple words, "All persons..."
great then it should be an open and shut case for the Supreme Court
 
That's an odd interpretation of Section 1 of the 14th amendment which does not speak to any characteristics nor the legal status of the natural born citizen's parents.

Important to note, the language of Section 1 begins with two very simple words, "All persons..."
Are ILLEGALS really persons?
 
So its safe to say you don't know what the hell you are talking about...........again
Oh I'm sure you're a saint among all of us sinners, we bow deeply, huzzah. However your indifference towards young people that you don't see or know that now find themselves in these difficult circumstances reveals more about your character than any amount of time and money you spend towards your preferred charitable causes.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT