ADVERTISEMENT

Putin “Double Tapped” First Responders with Second Missile after Murdering Civilians

Didn’t Biden drop out of ‘88 campaign for lying, sabula? Isn’t he well known for the outrageous tales that he continues to spin? Isn’t he on camera many times literally groping/fondling children during swearing in ceremonies?

I guess Lying Joey Child Molestor is every bit as appropriate as Lying Donnie Sexual Abuser.

Country is screwed with this ‘choice’.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sabula
He supports the guy who when asked, is first and foremost identified by the American people as 'Liar'. Then he's a convicted sexual abuser to boot. He totally earns Hillary's moniker of 'deplorable'.
Which of the wars that Hillary supported do you like, which one(s) did you find deplorable?
To keep it simple let’s just deal with these four:

1) Iraq regime change.

2) Helping Saudi Arabian regime change in Yemen

3) Syrian invasion and arming jihadists for regime change.

4) Libyan arming of jihadists for regime change
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
I'll keep it real simple for you. No. Keep on telling yourself that though if it makes it easier for you to support LyingDonnieSexualAbuser. I think only one of those two people is a convicted sexual abuser. Faces 91 felony charges. Has been impeached twice. Owes a half a billion $$ dollars in fines and bonds for his crimes and convictions. And that cash register is still ringing. Which one was that? Hint... you back the deplorable. Oh yeah and don't forget, as our religious right fundamentalist friends like to do, that he bonked and paid off at least two porn prostitutes. He's got that going i guess.
 
There is no difference between military targets and civilian targets in your view?
We’ve bombed funerals and weddings with double taps.

I need some ‘intellectual honesty’ from you, had you not heard of “double tap” bombings before this post?

Or have you known the whole time (this story is over a decade old), but been operating under the assumption ‘first responders’ in the places we bomb are all legit military targets?
 
We’ve bombed funerals and weddings with double taps.

I need some ‘intellectual honesty’ from you, had you not heard of “double tap” bombings before this post?

Or have you known the whole time (this story is over a decade old), but been operating under the assumption ‘first responders’ in the places we bomb are all legit military targets?

your whataboutism is exhausting dude.

Nothing you say will justify Putin slaughtering civilian Ukrainians in this manner.
 
your whataboutism is exhausting dude.
You're ducking the questions, dude.

I need some ‘intellectual honesty’ from you, had you not heard of “double tap” bombings before this post?
There's not shame in being ignorant about this argument against US drone wars, I'm just asking if you had even read about the method before this post.

Or have you known the whole time (this story is over a decade old), but been operating under the assumption ‘first responders’ in the places we bomb are all legit military targets?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Tom Paris
You're ducking the questions, dude.

I need some ‘intellectual honesty’ from you, had you not heard of “double tap” bombings before this post?
There's not shame in being ignorant about this argument against US drone wars, I'm just asking if you had even read about the method before this post.

Or have you known the whole time (this story is over a decade old), but been operating under the assumption ‘first responders’ in the places we bomb are all legit military targets?

Yes I have heard of double tap terrorist gatherings in Afghanistan. They always keep their women hostages / chattel close by and that is unfortunate. Dismantling terrorist networks is a legitimate military target.

What the Flying **** does that have to do with Russia targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure?

This entire thread, every post you made is Off Topic. Start your own damn thread, quit cluttering up mine. Piss off.
 
Yes I have heard of double tap terrorist gatherings in Afghanistan. They always keep their women hostages / chattel close by and that is unfortunate.
This is what I wondering. How you justify it to yourself, if you actually even knew.
It's definitely a practice used beyond Afghanistan, and used specifically to target the civilian first responders to the initial bombing.
But it's ok in your mind, because civilian first responders in the barbarian territories are really just chattel, and we don't have to worry ourselves with measures taken specifically to increase their slaughter.


What the Flying **** does that have to do with Russia targeting civilians and civilian infrastructure?

It's just 'unfortunate' when we have to do it, not a war crime.

****ing wild.
 
It's just 'unfortunate' when we have to do it, not a war crime.

****ing wild.

Keeping women and children near military operations to act as a shield / deterrent is against the Geneva Conventions and a crime against humanity. The terrorists do it anyway. They don’t care.

You cant or wont acknowledge the difference between that and Russia straight up targeting civilian infrastructure for maximum pain on civilians? No military value targets?

Why? Why is it so important to you to equivocate Russia’s actions? Soft spot for Putin?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tom Paris
Keeping women and children near military operations to act as a shield / deterrent is against the Geneva Conventions and a crime against humanity. The terrorists do it anyway. They don’t care.

You cant or wont acknowledge the difference between that and Russia straight up targeting civilian infrastructure for maximum pain on civilians? No military value targets?

Why? Why is it so important to you to equivocate Russia’s actions? Soft spot for Putin?
Because bot.
 
Keeping women and children near military operations to act as a shield / deterrent is against the Geneva Conventions and a crime against humanity. The terrorists do it anyway. They don’t care.

We're droning people in their tents/villages, in their countries on the other side of the world, and you think they're violating the Geneva conventions by being with their families when they get bombed?
It's so twisted it's actually funny.

You cant or wont acknowledge the difference between that and Russia straight up targeting civilian infrastructure for maximum pain on civilians? No military value targets?

I know when I cite a funeral or wedding that the U.S. targeted with bombs you'll assume it a military funeral, or I guess a military wedding.
It's how you justify these things in your head.

Why? Why is it so important to you to equivocate Russia’s actions? Soft spot for Putin?
Your mistake is seeing a 'soft spot' for Putin, when it's actually a hard look at our neocons and how they've dishonorably prosecuted wars around the globe in our name.

I want Putin, Clinton, and the rest of the warmongers prosecuted, not excused.

Why do you have a 'soft spot' for neocons and make excuses for their stupid wars and criminal conduct?
 
Last edited:
Somehow, a large chunk of the GOP is now okay with Russia/Putin, and I will never understand it. Somehow Trump has gotten Putin to no longer seem like an enemy of the US.

Ukraine didn't bend the knee to the Fuhrer when he asked them to make shit up on his political opponent. He got impeached over that. Therefore they must all die.

Also, America first!

Signed, the party that spearheaded the Iraq War and called everyone who didn't support it un-American.
 
Yes, the drone war under the last few presidents was terrible.. don't think it was any better under Trump, in fact it got worse

Would you be in favor as I am of indicting them all and letting The Hague decide if they’re guilty of war crimes?

If we give war crimes a pass, how do we restrain the war criminals?
 
Would you be in favor as I am of indicting them all and letting The Hague decide if they’re guilty of war crimes?

If we give war crimes a pass, how do we restrain the war criminals?

If they signed off on each strike personally, sure
 
Ukraine didn't bend the knee to the Fuhrer when he asked them to make shit up on his political opponent. He got impeached over that. Therefore they must all die.

Also, America first!

Signed, the party that spearheaded the Iraq War and called everyone who didn't support it un-American.
There would have been no Iraq War without Biden and his ilk throwing in with the Bush/Cheney gang.

Uni-party.

Both sides.

What’s the central reason that Congress approved the war? Key Democrats like Biden crossed over and made a deal with Bush,” says Robert Naiman, with the anti-interventionist Just Foreign Policy group.

The simple truth is that Biden voted to give Bush broad power to go to war with Iraq. He did so as a top-ranking Democrat in the Senate: the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. And he did so at a time when the majority of Americans did not support taking immediate military action.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT