So, if it is disruptive on 3rd downs, why don't we mix it up and run more of it on 1st or 2nd down?
So, if it is disruptive on 3rd downs, why don't we mix it up and run more of it on 1st or 2nd down?
/threadIt's designed for passing situations. It doesn't work well versus the run.
There is usually a safety lurking off of the screen. I don't think I've ever seen all 11 defenders at the LOS.Queston about the raider - when I see it I see a bunch of guys up near the line and it looks like everyone on the outside is singled up. So what stops a team from just running receivers on deep routes when they see it and just throwing over the top of it
But then that would be cover 1, so the safety wouldn't be able to help on every receiver right?There is usually a safety lurking off of the screen. I don't think I've ever seen all 11 defenders at the LOS.
A couple reasons why Iowa typically doesn't get beat deep in the Raider package:But then that would be cover 1, so the safety wouldn't be able to help on every receiver right?
Obviously we haven't really been burned this way since we've been doing the raider so it obviously works, I'm just trying to figure out how.
Yes, particularly that last part. They tend to get to the QB very quickly in this stance, because they are already one step move wise ahead of the O-line.A couple reasons why Iowa typically doesn't get beat deep in the Raider package:
Put all of these things together and the pressure usually gets there before the deep ball can be completed.
- Typically have 2 deep safeties.
- Reigning Thorpe Award winner taking away the WR1.
- Deep routes take time to develop. The Raider package is all about getting after the QB.