ADVERTISEMENT

Report: A minimum-wage worker can't afford a 2-bedroom apartment anywhere in the U.S.

cigaretteman

HB King
May 29, 2001
79,428
62,530
113
The economy’s booming. Some states have raised minimum wages. But even with recent wage growth for the lowest-paid workers, there is still nowhere in the country where someone working a full-time minimum-wage job could afford to rent a modest two-bedroom apartment, according to an annual report released Wednesday by the National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Not even in Arkansas, the state with the cheapest housing in the country. One would need to earn $13.84 an hour — about $29,000 a year — to afford a two-bedroom apartment there. The minimum wage in Arkansas is $8.50 an hour.

Even the $15 living wage championed by Democrats would not make a dent in the vast majority of states.

In Hawaii, the state with the most expensive housing, one would have to make $36.13 — about $75,000 a year — to afford a decent two-bedroom apartment. The minimum wage in Hawaii rose to $10.10 an hour this year.

It gets worse in many metropolitan areas. San Francisco, Marin and San Mateo counties top the list of most expensive jurisdictions, where one would need to make $60.02 an hour to afford a modest two-bedroom apartment.

“The housing crisis is growing, especially for the lowest-income workers,” said Diane Yentel, president of the National Low Income Housing Coalition. “The rents are far out of reach from what the average renter is earning.”

Downsizing to a one-bedroom apartment will only help so much.

According to the report, a one-bedroom is affordable for minimum-wage workers in only 22 counties in five states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon and Washington. Those states all set their minimum wages higher than the federal minimum of $7.25.

Nationally, one would have to earn $17.90 an hour to afford a modest one-bedroom apartment or $22.10 an hour for a two-bedroom rental. That’s based on the common budgeting standard of spending a maximum of 30 percent of income on housing.

The report estimates that renters nationally make an average of $16.88 an hour. That means even those making above minimum wage struggle to afford rent.



Housing costs have continued to rise with growing demand for rental housing in the decade since the Great Recession. At the same time, new rental construction has tilted toward the luxury market because of increasingly high development costs, the report said. The number of homes renting for $2,000 or more per month nearly doubled between 2005 and 2015.

“While the housing market may have recovered for many, we are nonetheless experiencing an affordable housing crisis, especially for very low-income families,” Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., said in the report.

The low-wage workforce is projected to grow over the next decade, particularly in service-sector jobs such as personal-care aides and food-preparation workers.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration has tried cutting federal housing subsidies for the lowest-income Americans. As it stands, only 1 in 4 households eligible for federal rent assistance gets any help, the report said. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson recently proposed tripling rent for the poorest households and making it easier for housing authorities to impose work requirements on those receiving rent subsidies.

http://www.nonpareilonline.com/news...cle_1e1b6155-d3a7-57de-994b-2759455d710e.html
 
There are plenty of jobs out there paying much higher than minimum wage which is good! Hell, target starts their employees at 12.50!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3boysmom
In before some dumbass claims minimum wage jobs are there for teenagers or those entering the job market looking for pop and candy money.

1000-images-about-franklin-delano-roosevelt-on-pinterest-good-44584.jpg
 
This is not a minimum wage issue. How many non-minimum wage people are making salaries of more than $75,000 that's needed in Hawaii or $125,000 needed in San Francisco?
 
So, what's the point?....
Or.. what's the solution? If this article says 15 wont even make a dent then were long past the point of this being achievable. Hell many of the fast food joints and retailers are already scrapping many minimum wage jobs
 
We are subsidizing low wages by paying companies to provide low income apartments.

How many companies provide low income housing? I'm not aware of any. Instead our governments at all levels subsidize these companies by trying to fill the void by providing for affordable housing initiatives/projects.
 
Further more, the idiots that continue with these threads are the same ones who cried about corporate tax cuts that will have no impact on employees or the cost of goods. If you truly believe that, then you should be able to understand that no corporation is going to eat the extra costs associated with higher wages. Said costs will be passed on to consumers in which case the extra cash they made will have no impact on their life and those of us who aren't piles of shit will have less money in our pockets when we receive no raise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
I might say if you are earning minimum wage, you should probably have a roommate for the 2 bedroom apartment. I had roommates and a well-paying professional IT job...
This is the answer. I couldn't afford a 2 br apartment by myself back when min. wage was $3.25, so this is old news.
 
A watched a CNN video about a woman that makes $7.50/hr. They list her annual income as $6240/yr. This is disingenuous at best, as a standard work year is 2080 hrs ($15,600/yr).

She gets $216/ mo SNAP.
$125/mo housing assistance
Daycare for $10/wk (where I live, daycare is close to $700-$1000/mo)
Medicaid (mostly free healthcare)

So close to $1000/mo in benefits (not counting Medicaid). If she works full time and no benefits are lost, that is close to $27,600/yr or $13.27/hr.

I'm sure it sucks to be poor, but the benefits seem to take away the incentive to work for a better job.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrianNole09
A watched a CNN video about a woman that makes $7.50/hr. They list her annual income as $6240/yr. This is disingenuous at best, as a standard work year is 2080 hrs ($15,600/yr).

She gets $216/ mo SNAP.
$125/mo housing assistance
Daycare for $10/wk (where I live, daycare is close to $700-$1000/mo)
Medicaid (mostly free healthcare)

So close to $1000/mo in benefits (not counting Medicaid). If she works full time and no benefits are lost, that is close to $27,600/yr or $13.27/hr.

I'm sure it sucks to be poor, but the benefits seem to take away the incentive to work for a better job.
You're telling me that $27,600 with kids is at all comfortable?
 
You're telling me that $27,600 with kids is at all comfortable?

It certainly wouldn't be.

You ever left this country and gone anywhere like India? Brazil? SE Asia? maybe even Mexico? how about places like Eastern Europe? The Middle East? Any part of Africa?
 
For Flick and Huey:

This is from a Forbes article about FDR's quote. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timwor...s-myths-about-a-15-minimum-wage/#7036e57d5ec8

But even so it's worth looking at what he meant by a "living wage". That 25 cents an hour, if we upgrade it just by general inflation to today would be $4.20 an hour. This is indeed a living wage as it would be possible to live upon it. I don't say live well, or live not in poverty, but that $8,400 a year puts you into the top 20% of all global incomes. Yes, that is after we correct for the price differences between the US and other countries. So, given that 80% (actually, it's 82.5%) of humanity earn less than this and very few of them are dying of poverty then this is indeed a living wage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SotaHawk87
If we raise min wage to $15/hr ($31.2k/yr) will we still give that person $12k/yr in benefits? That would bring their annual compensation to $43k, about the same as a lot of college grads.
 
If we raise min wage to $15/hr ($31.2k/yr) will we still give that person $12k/yr in benefits? That would bring their annual compensation to $43k, about the same as a lot of college grads.

Wouldn't $16 per hour be better though?
 
I'm not an economist, but doesn't raising wages create higher cost which creates higher rent?
It does. Which is why you need to find a butter zone. Pay too much in wages, costs get too high, and consumers stop buying. Pay too little in wages, incomes get too low, and consumers stop buying. Neither extreme is good.
 
If we raise min wage to $15/hr ($31.2k/yr) will we still give that person $12k/yr in benefits? That would bring their annual compensation to $43k, about the same as a lot of college grads.
If we raise it to $15, I would imagine we wouldn't need to keep supplementing them as much.
 
Last edited:
Many minimum wage jobs are not easy at all. I'm all for spreading the wealth around.

That being said, people should not be having children unless they're making like 100k.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT