Bags gonna be packin. If you aren't happy about this YOU are part of the problem.
Nobody's stopping anyone from getting vaccinated. How many times do you have to be told?Enjoy your polio.
Sledgehammer to the corrupt? Absoultely.LOL. Gotta love the sledgehammer approach to everything.
What's corrupt though?Sledgehammer to the corrupt? Absoultely.
What's corrupt though?
What's corrupt though?
Tell us again that you have no idea how vaccinations work, it's funny each and every time.Nobody's stopping anyone from getting vaccinated. How many times do you have to be told?
Yes, stay the phuck out of Colorado without your vaccinations. States rights amirite!?!I hope blue states require vax passports to enter.
His MD is going to be very helpful for solving these problems.Bags gonna be packin. If you aren't happy about this YOU are part of the problem.
You haven't been following along. If we can get to that point with everyone alive, you're about to find out.What's corrupt though?
I think his point is that those wanting to avoid infection can do so. The herd doesn't need to protect anybody.Tell us again that you have no idea how vaccinations work, it's funny each and every time.
Well, except when you're the one that gets the measles.
But why? Corrupt means something beyond just disagreeing with certain FDA policy.The FDA.
Gross misrepresentation of what's happened here, from a butthurt Kamunist.Tell us again that you have no idea how vaccinations work, it's funny each and every time.
Well, except when you're the one that gets the measles.
The revolving door between the FDA, Big Pharma and congress/lobbyists.What's corrupt though?
Sledgehammer to the corrupt? Absoultely.
How many of those came across the border?DJT is corrupt. AND a habitual felon.
I'd agree on item 1. I'd support that being cleaned up all across government. If they want to set new rules there, more power to them.The revolving door between the FDA, Big Pharma and congress/lobbyists.
The liability-free environment the vaccine manufacturers are allowed to exploit.
Not holding my breath. As much as I’d like to see RFK curb stomp Big Pharma I don’t trust Trump to see it through.
Yes you're right, I'm a little more hopeful this time around.Not holding my breath. As much as I’d like to see RFK curb stomp Big Pharma I don’t trust Trump to see it through.
Yeah, they are.On item 2... are vaccine manufactures really immune(!) to consequences in the scenario of a significantly faulty product? I have my doubts.
And if we know anything about Trump, it’s that he’s a man of his word.Yes you're right, I'm a little more hopeful this time around.
ABC was reporting last night that one of the big Trump donors was not happy about RFK. Probably has money tied up in it. We'll see I guess. Trump did say in his speech last night that RFK had free reign over everything but the oil. 😊
Time will tell.And if we know anything about Trump, it’s that he’s a man of his word.
Well you think they'd be protected against the inherent reasonable risk associated with the vaccine. You know beforehand there is *some* risk involved.Yeah, they are.
The odds are further stacked against victims judicially on three more fronts by The Vaccine Injury Act.I'd agree on item 1. I'd support that being cleaned up all across government. If they want to set new rules there, more power to them.
On item 2... are vaccine manufactures really immune(!) to consequences in the scenario of a significantly faulty product? I have my doubts. And if so, does this sort of thing exist across other medicine?
It doesn't seem right if you couldn't sue for some situation where gross negligence is involved. (say, something related to the production of vaccines that results in them being contaminated)The odds are further stacked against victims judicially on three more fronts by The Vaccine Injury Act.
The Act limited the venue for a vaccine claim strictly to the geography of Washington DC. By making anyone injured by a vaccine forced to argue before a section of the US Supreme Court, victims could not address a claim with a trial of their peers. Nor could Erin Brokovich gather them together as a Class Action suit should say, a batch of vaccine caused meningitis or HIV/AIDS.
Vaccine victims could no longer sue the manufacturer, the doctor or anyone else if they got hurt by a faulty or misleading vaccine. They could not subpoena or cross examine the parties either. Those hurt by a vaccine would now rely upon a hearing before one of the twelve lawyers at the Office of Special Master within the US Supreme Court. Vaccine victims would be judged from a table of injuries.
Even worse, the statute of the claim was limited in time and scope. The claim would have to be made within two of death or three years of symptom discovery.
Wonder how Dr. William Thomspon feels about the election.The odds are further stacked against victims judicially on three more fronts by The Vaccine Injury Act.
The Act limited the venue for a vaccine claim strictly to the geography of Washington DC. By making anyone injured by a vaccine forced to argue before a section of the US Supreme Court, victims could not address a claim with a trial of their peers. Nor could Erin Brokovich gather them together as a Class Action suit should say, a batch of vaccine caused meningitis or HIV/AIDS.
Vaccine victims could no longer sue the manufacturer, the doctor or anyone else if they got hurt by a faulty or misleading vaccine. They could not subpoena or cross examine the parties either. Those hurt by a vaccine would now rely upon a hearing before one of the twelve lawyers at the Office of Special Master within the US Supreme Court. Vaccine victims would be judged from a table of injuries.
Even worse, the statute of the claim was limited in time and scope. The claim would have to be made within two of death or three years of symptom discovery.
They're all contaminated.It doesn't seem right if you couldn't sue for some situation where gross negligence is involved. (say, something related to the production of vaccines that results in them being contaminated)
Although I'd have to actually read a bit about the law and why it might be useful to come to a strong opinion. (it probably fits a broader pattern of law, too... not that this would necessarily excuse it, but it probably isn't just a "vaccine thing")
I recommend spending some time with Aaron Siri on X.It doesn't seem right if you couldn't sue for some situation where gross negligence is involved. (say, something related to the production of vaccines that results in them being contaminated)
Although I'd have to actually read a bit about the law and why it might be useful to come to a strong opinion. (it probably fits a broader pattern of law, too... not that this would necessarily excuse it, but it probably isn't just a "vaccine thing")
You walked right into that one
Darn right what's been happening is deplorable.Deplorable.
It your kids will get it, then you’ll want us to pay for their treatment.Nobody's stopping anyone from getting vaccinated. How many times do you have to be told?