ADVERTISEMENT

Ruh Roh : Black Hawk Co vote totals dont match what was reported

They corrected. People are finding other errors though.

The IDP is essentially crowd sourcing Twitter at this point.


Why does the Blackhawk Co Official have Sanders with much higher vote totals than what the IDP has ?
 
Why does the Blackhawk Co Official have Sanders with much higher vote totals than what the IDP has ?

Incompetence? I imagine after the vote is complete they are going to have to do it again. Have you looked again since they did the correction and went from 85 to 86%? It ended up being a 2000 vote swing and 20 some SDEs to Sanders.
 
Incompetence? I imagine after the vote is complete they are going to have to do it again. Have you looked again since they did the correction and went from 85 to 86%? It ended up being a 2000 vote swing and 20 some SDEs to Sanders.
Maybe Cheating ?
 
Cheating?

Yes, because the dems magnificently implemented their plan to initially shit the bed and look incompetent on the national stage - all in order to elect the gay guy or the socialist - so they could manipulate the now delayed vote totals because nobody would be looking too closely after the initial fiasco.
 
Cheating?

Yes, because the dems magnificently implemented their plan to initially shit the bed and look incompetent on the national stage - all in order to elect the gay guy or the socialist - so they could manipulate the now delayed vote totals because nobody would be looking too closely after the initial fiasco.
yea, its not like the DNC would ever cheat Bernie right ?

:rolleyes:
 
That would be bold and tough in a caucus. All of these numbers are public, with a paper trail, and now include popular vote. As well as campaigns tracking the data on their own. Especially the Sanders campaign with their app made just for caucuses.

Now if you wanted to say they tried to manufacture consent with a partial release that gave the media the narrative it wanted, I could see that being a plausible theory.
 
No I think what the dem primary in Iowa is doing is blatant and everyone can see the Cheating. Good luck getting Sanders voters to the polls in 2020 DNC.
 
That would be bold and tough in a caucus. All of these numbers are public, with a paper trail, and now include popular vote. As well as campaigns tracking the data on their own. Especially the Sanders campaign with their app made just for caucuses.

Now if you wanted to say they tried to manufacture consent with a partial release that gave the media the narrative it wanted, I could see that being a plausible theory.
the vote counting looks awful shady. "incompetence" ? That will be the cover.
 
That would be bold and tough in a caucus. All of these numbers are public, with a paper trail, and now include popular vote. As well as campaigns tracking the data on their own. Especially the Sanders campaign with their app made just for caucuses.

Now if you wanted to say they tried to manufacture consent with a partial release that gave the media the narrative it wanted, I could see that being a plausible theory.

Biden is the narrative the media wanted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: royhobbs2
PW5QKgM.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moral and royhobbs2
No I think what the dem primary in Iowa is doing is blatant and everyone can see the Cheating. Good luck getting Sanders voters to the polls in 2020 DNC.
This is so dumb. Do you think they thought they could just give wrong results and nobody would notice?
 
This is so dumb. Do you think they thought they could just give wrong results and nobody would notice?
I think the DNC came in and took over the vote count, as reported by Jimmy Dore in the video above. Hell yes they will cheat Bernie
 
I think the DNC came in and took over the vote count, as reported by Jimmy Dore in the video above. Hell yes they will cheat Bernie
You've never been able to explain how though. How will they change the votes without people knowing?

I watched the video you just posted. Interesting they don't show Gabbard's vote total. They don't want people to know how bad she did. Why is Dore lying about Gabbard?
 
You've never been able to explain how though. How will they change the votes without people knowing?

I watched the video you just posted. Interesting they don't show Gabbard's vote total. They don't want people to know how bad she did. Why is Dore lying about Gabbard?
Shill

How would the DNC rig a vote count ?

I suppose the same way they have been doing it for the last 100 years. Chicago , have they ever had a rigged vote count ? Oh I dunno
 
You've never been able to explain how though. How will they change the votes without people knowing?

I watched the video you just posted. Interesting they don't show Gabbard's vote total. They don't want people to know how bad she did. Why is Dore lying about Gabbard?
they took gabbard out months ago by hills declaring her a russian
 
  • Like
Reactions: royhobbs2
Explain your theory. I'm open to changing my mind. But you've made no coherent attempt to explain how they would cheat Bernie.
it was out there for all to see: bern leading by 20 plus points then all of sudden pete says he won. the how is not an issue, the "why" is. same as when hills did it in 2016. same as when Obama beat hills in 2008. it's very obvious.
 
Again, Bernie supporters are the most annoying people in the Democratic arena. I'm so tired of the claims of cheating.

I actually like Bernie, but his supporters drive me insane.
 
Bull$hit that’s the most obvious case of election fraud since mayor Daley in Chicago with Kennedy


DNC is crooked as hell
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT