You're a propaganda machine...a fountain of disinformation.
You're a propaganda machine...a fountain of disinformation.
U mean it WASN'T Putin setting himself up as the "retarded kid" in the hockey game?You're a propaganda machine...a fountain of disinformation.
That is a lot of pressure on that goalie to not accidentally stop those.
If it helps you avoid the topic and the lies you get called out on...carry on Ned!U mean it WASN'T Putin setting himself up as the "retarded kid" in the hockey game?
Of course, Nazis stick together. Look into Chrystia Freeland's father and how she just froze bank accounts of Canadiens.
Apex
@Apex_WW
·
43m
#Ukraine has received a plane load of machine guns, surveillance gear and rifles as part of a Canadian military assistance package, Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov said on Saturday. - RTRS
What's up there?Of course, Nazis stick together. Look into Chrystia Freeland's father and how she just froze bank accounts of Canadiens.
You have managed the impossible by aligning most of the conservatives and liberals on this site against the Russian cause. If your superiors are reading this they should ship your sorry ass to Siberia for your abject failure to convince anyone (except for your moron in crime @seminole97 ) that Russia is in the right on this topic.How do I say this politely:
Well said.You have managed the impossible by aligning most of the conservatives and liberals on this site against the Russian cause. If your superiors are reading this they should ship your sorry ass to Siberia for your abject failure to convince anyone (except for your moron in crime @seminole97 ) that Russia is in the right on this topic.
All you do is parrot Russian propaganda and play a game of gotcha with verbal agreements made 30 years ago - as if they, and you, are relevant today.
I guess I should congratulate you for shining a bright light on Russian Propaganda. Keep it up, every post you makes hardens our support for Ukraine.
удачи иди трахни себя
And what exactly have you shown in this thread? Nada. I have put it out there and you have challenged nothing. Because you cannot.You have managed the impossible by aligning most of the conservatives and liberals on this site against the Russian cause. If your superiors are reading this they should ship your sorry ass to Siberia for your abject failure to convince anyone (except for your moron in crime @seminole97 ) that Russia is in the right on this topic.
All you do is parrot Russian propaganda and play a game of gotcha with verbal agreements made 30 years ago - as if they, and you, are relevant today.
I guess I should congratulate you for shining a bright light on Russian Propaganda. Keep it up, every post you makes hardens our support for Ukraine.
удачи иди трахни себя
Wow, guess I struck a nerve. Is Putin paying you for word count? Perhaps he should pay for likes and influence generated instead.And what exactly have you shown in this thread? Nada. I have put it out there and you have challenged nothing. Because you cannot.
I have asked questions to challengers and they, not only could not answer, they ran away or worse, acted like a petulant child and chirped the same old tripe that Hillary Clinton, Ned Price and McCarthy apply. You're no different. You're no better than a little lamb marching to the slaughterhouse.
What Russian sources have I parroted? My views are shaped from Professor Stephen F Cohen, who was Emeritus of Russian Studies at (2) elite universities (Princeton and NYU). John Mearsheimer is a West Point grad, U-Chicago and CFR member as was Cohen. Also shaped from here, where Bill Bradley sits on the board and I am in agreement with him. Are they Russians or spouting Russian propaganda? You have not even remotely shown an ounce of scholarship to engage in civil discourse. Just attack and libel.
Why would Russia invade Ukraine? They could have marched in at their choosing over the past 8 years, but, did not.
Iraq WMD's ?
Gulf of Tonkin?
Or the premeditated crime of invading/bombing 7 countries in 5 years. Different this time, huh? How many times must someone piss on your leg to arrive at the conclusion that it's not raining out?
Scott Ritter, US Marine Intelligence Officer, is he my source of Russian Prop as well?
The Evidence for Invasion the US Could Produce
Rather than produce fake evidence to the U.N. Security Council, as Colin Powell had, Antony Blinken just produced nothing at all, though the U.S. has intelligence it can show, writes Scott Ritter. By Scott Ritter Special to Consortium News While U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken trconsortiumnews.com
Our last Ambassador to the Soviet Union, is he Russian as well?
ACURA’s Jack Matlock: VIDEO: Ukraine Crisis Stems Directly from Post-Cold War Push to Expand NATO
DN!February 19, 2022
Look at the Board of Directors! Are they Russian?
American Committee for US-Russia Accord
usrussiaaccord.org
All you have done is taken the corporate line of Lockheed Martin and Raytheon. You're an unthinkable. A piece of lint.
Biden and Blinken, unlike Powell, who deliberately lied to the world, has shown nothing. Nor have you.
Tuchus offen tish or STFU!
Hey good for you. You’re a real trooper.He's my bitch. A foam finger waver.
@Vladamir Putin - See aboveWow, guess I struck a nerve. Is Putin paying you for word count? Perhaps he should pay for likes and influence generated instead.
Your like ratio: 0.32! It literally takes you three posts to generate a like. Pathetic. At that ratio I am surprised you have not been shot by your superiors.
The report neglected to mention it was a Cessna.
Apex
@Apex_WW
·
43m
#Ukraine has received a plane load of machine guns, surveillance gear and rifles as part of a Canadian military assistance package, Ukrainian Defence Minister Oleksii Reznikov said on Saturday. - RTRS
Would anyone say you were simply “parroting Nazi propaganda” if you observe much of the genesis of WW2 in the treaties to conclude WW1?German postcard circa the annexation of the Sudetenland (in green)
Much of what you say and what Nat says is sound enough.Would anyone say you were simply “parroting Nazi propaganda” if you observe much of the genesis of WW2 in the treaties to conclude WW1?
I feel like patriotic fervor quickly envelopes rational analysis.
Nobody here thinks Kennedy was ‘wrong’ to throw a blockade around Cuba and refuse to allow “offensive weapons” to be staged so close to our border.
But it’s impossible for them put themselves in another nation’s shoes and even asking them to acknowledge that since 1991 NATO has been used aggressively to partition nations and engage in regime change (without even our Congress approving the attacks).
You link them to the UK Parliamentary report that the attack on Libya was based on lies about civilian massacres and without refuting any of it or citing any evidence to the contrary they’ll call you a liar and get likes.
Imagine if the WH fervor was focused on what the gulf monarchies have wrought in Yemen as they are what Putin might do in Ukraine?
But that might delay some arms sales, so let’s circle back to that at a later date.
NATO is a defensive force and was asked in by countries that feared Russia would re-occupy them. Libya killed Americans and Khadafi was proud of it.Would anyone say you were simply “parroting Nazi propaganda” if you observe much of the genesis of WW2 in the treaties to conclude WW1?
I feel like patriotic fervor quickly envelopes rational analysis.
Nobody here thinks Kennedy was ‘wrong’ to throw a blockade around Cuba and refuse to allow “offensive weapons” to be staged so close to our border.
But it’s impossible for them put themselves in another nation’s shoes and even asking them to acknowledge that since 1991 NATO has been used aggressively to partition nations and engage in regime change (without even our Congress approving the attacks).
You link them to the UK Parliamentary report that the attack on Libya was based on lies about civilian massacres and without refuting any of it or citing any evidence to the contrary they’ll call you a liar and get likes.
Imagine if the WH fervor was focused on what the gulf monarchies have wrought in Yemen as they are what Putin might do in Ukraine?
But that might delay some arms sales, so let’s circle back to that at a later date
That wasn't even slightly why we bombed Libya.Libya killed Americans and Khadafi was proud of it.
So you're saying they won't invade further?Why would Russia invade Ukraine? They could have marched in at their choosing over the past 8 years, but, did not.
NATO is not an "offensive" alliance.
Ergo, repeating the Kremlin talking points on this is simply serving to push their propaganda.
Those countries, who were fully controlled by Russia, no longer want to be subservient pawns. It's WHY they joined NATO, to prevent invasion and re-acquisition by Russia.
The Russian stance on this is fully illogical UNLESS you understand that Russia wants to fully re-control those independent nations.
That should not be "normalized", and it's exactly what Putin's goal is here: normalize the control of satellite countries by his oligarchs.