Originally posted by JRHawk2003:
Some of you are graduates and really this clueless?
The athletic department and KF are low low priorities. Barta is only judged by the fact that the department is self sustaining. I expect it from the Kirkwood fan base, but sheesh people,
Get a clue. It makes zero .....0....nada difference to the athletic dept who is hired as president.
They have their hands full raising money and dealing with real problems.
Threads like this make me think the U of Chicago got it right.
You are so wrong. Hayden Fry threatened to resign over Hunter Rawlings' idea to make freshmen ineligible. Additionally, sports can provide excellent PR and exposure for a school, if done properly.
Here is an excerpt from Fry and Bump's spat with Rawlings:
Hunter Rawlings III probably thought he had a great idea. Maybe he even thought he'd be acclaimed a genius - or, if nothing else, a sensible guy.
Wonder what the University of Iowa president is thinking now that he's been roundly trashed.
Three weeks ago, disturbed by the Norby Walters-Lloyd Bloom trial and the decay of academic standards in college athletics, Rawlings suggested that freshmen athletes be ruled ineligible for competition.
It is not a new idea. Until 1972, that was the norm. Rawlings is of the opinion that maybe the original ban on freshmen wasn't such a bad thing and said he would do everything in his power to bring about a change in the NCAA. If he can't do that, then in his own conference, the Big Ten. And if he can't do that within the next three years, then he'll invoke the policy at Iowa regardless.
Well, you would have thought the man called for the assassination of Herky the Hawkeye. Boosters went nuts. Athletic Director Bump Elliott publicly disagreed with Rawlings, saying, ''I don't know if he completely thought it out.'' And football coach Hayden Fry said he would consider resigning if Rawlings didn't reconsider. Fry: ''That's like bringing in a music player and saying, 'Don't play the piano for a year.' It doesn't make sense.''