It doesn’t make it something to dismiss out of hand either.
It's more indicative of what a university is willing to accept.
It doesn’t make it something to dismiss out of hand either.
Once George's recruits were gone Davis' win/ loss record is about the same as Frans.That doesn't make it any more glamorous.
I don’t get your point - by most metrics Fran has had a successful tenure at Iowa. The remaining knock on him is tournament success.It's more indicative of what a university is willing to accept.
I don’t get your point - by most metrics Fran has had a successful tenure at Iowa. The remaining knock on him is tournament success.
Do you think he has been a bad coach?The most remarkable accomplishment is years of service.
Do you think he has been a bad coach?
And no, that’s not the same thing as not being as successful as we wish he had been.
Aside from lack of sweet sixteen appearances aside, I’d argue that to this point he’s been a good coach here, deserving of his tenure.
Get a coach that can make a NCAA tourney run or win a Big 10 title and see what happens.
Mission accomplished.
Now show the picture of the regular season...you know the Big 10 title. Not the tournament title.Mission accomplished.
Really, I hadn’t picked up on that, at all.His performance level combined with his outbursts. I'm not a fan.
I don't think he's horrible, but he has zero Sweet 16s and 0 Big 10 titles.Do you think he has been a bad coach?
And no, that’s not the same thing as not being as successful as we wish he had been.
Aside from lack of sweet sixteen appearances aside, I’d argue that to this point he’s been a good coach here, deserving of his tenure.
Really, I hadn’t picked up on that, at all.
Do you think he’s a bad coach, or just not meeting your expectations?
To an extent I understand the antics argument - but also feel it’s overblown:I don't think he's horrible, but he has zero Sweet 16s and 0 Big 10 titles.
That combined with his antics on the sideline actually makes it pretty unbelievable that he hasn't been let go. He should call Lickliter every day to thank him.
He's an average coach. His Big Ten record confirms that.
Now do the real ones.
I don’t think he’s an avg coach.
Suit yourself; I’m also allowing for getting Iowa out of the program crater he inherited.His career Big Ten record says otherwise.
Suit yourself; I’m also allowing for getting Iowa out of the program crater he inherited.
That was looming like a giant abyss like a potential program-killer. First two years were 12-24 in conference; only one losing record in conference since.
Agree to disagree with you. It’s been somewhat disappointing but not totally unexpected given the roster turnover entering the year.He's currently in his 14th season and he's producing conference results similar to his second year.
It’s much more than 3-4 times a game but Iowa is not good at closing out on the shooter or in short, defense of any kind.Slightly off topic, but can someone explain to me how a three point shooter gets left along in the corner about 3-4 times every game? You would think after 10 years Fran would recognize this defensive fatal flaw and be able to solve this mystery.
Yep. Iowa basketball has mostly been pretty meh for the past 25 years. Or the last 35, depending in how hard you want to be on Dr. Tom.Get a coach that can make a NCAA tourney run or win a Big 10 title and see what happens.
That's part of it - how much depends on your POV i suppose.Yep. Iowa basketball has mostly been pretty meh for the past 25 years. Or the last 35, depending in how hard you want to be on Dr. Tom.
High floor, low ceiling. No conference titles. Only 1 trip past the NCAA tournament (1999) in the past 3.5 decades. And people wonder why there's not much fan excitement. You pretty much know what you're going to get.
I'll be damned, this handle isn't a bot.Slightly off topic, but can someone explain to me how a three point shooter gets left along in the corner about 3-4 times every game? You would think after 10 years Fran would recognize this defensive fatal flaw and be able to solve this mystery.
I won't defend all things Fran, but he inherited a burning dumpster on top of a pile of burning tires. By year 2 they were actually a credible team. Since then he's had one losing season in conference play. Throughout his tenure the B-10 has arguably been the toughest conference for hoops top to bottom.He's currently in his 14th season and he's producing conference results similar to his second year.
I won't defend all things Fran, but he inherited a burning dumpster on top of a pile of burning tires. By year 2 they were actually a credible team. Since then he's had one losing season in conference play. Throughout his tenure the B-10 has arguably been the toughest conference for hoops top to bottom.
The one aberration season was 2017-18 which featured a gangly kid named Luka Garza, who many on this board labeled a wasted scholarship.
Would I prefer some deeper runs in the NCAAT? Who wouldn't. But, he's been consistently successful, and he graduates kids without yearly scandals.
It’s only one more year longer than Davis.
Including a lot more conference games instead of many of the cupcakes that Davis was known for scheduling. Frans nonconference varies but 2/3 of his schedule are conference games. That wasn’t the case for Davis.Fran has 5 more wins than Dr. Tom at Iowa.
Fran has 47 more losses than Dr. Tom at Iowa.
They play a lot more games now.
How is this an answer to anything? Kids aren't coming to Carver, that's been proven over and over. Putting the students next to the floor only could Carver look worse. When we are winning games, fans show up and Carver is a fine facility. It could be better but most arenas could be betterThis lack of attendance should provide BG the opportunity to change seating for everyone, including the students around the lower bowl and try to get them closer to the floor and opposing team to make noise. Add suites around the arena and you’ve only got to sell maybe 8,000 to 10,000 to the general public depending on suite size numbers and student attendance. I’d hope they can get 3,000 to 5,000 students to attend a game with 20,000 plus students at the university since they aren’t showing up now.
Students have been given largely crap seats at carver for decades. Need to find out if it’s apathy or crap seats that’s keeping them away.How is this an answer to anything? Kids aren't coming to Carver, that's been proven over and over. Putting the students next to the floor only could Carver look worse. When we are winning games, fans show up and Carver is a fine facility. It could be better but most arenas could be better
What do students have to pay?Students have been given largely crap seats at carver for decades. Need to find out if it’s apathy or crap seats that’s keeping them away.
No idea anymore.What do students have to pay?
Yes. He has willfully ignored 1/2 the game: defense. I think he is a good offensive coach and a brilliant OOB coach. But: you can't ignore 1/2 the court.Do you think he has been a bad coach?
And no, that’s not the same thing as not being as successful as we wish he had been.
Aside from lack of sweet sixteen appearances aside, I’d argue that to this point he’s been a good coach here, deserving of his tenure.
How is this an answer to anything? Kids aren't coming to Carver, that's been proven over and over. Putting the students next to the floor only could Carver look worse. When we are winning games, fans show up and Carver is a fine facility. It could be better but most arenas could be better
Students have been given largely crap seats at carver for decades. Need to find out if it’s apathy or crap seats that’s keeping them away.