ADVERTISEMENT

Scary stuff on Halloween

A person being charged with voter fraud is a sign the system is working. A riot to overthrow the results of an election after being litigated in the courts is another matter.
I'm glad to see the system is working. For a long time we've been told there is no voter fraud, or when someone is caught, it's only GOP doing it. The question is, how many people aren't caught?
 
But but but the courts. But but but the courts said. But but but the courts.
Still not seeing what point you are trying to make. Yes, the courts found no evidence of voter fraud in the last presidential election. There is evidence of fraud here, so, duh?
 
I'm glad to see the system is working. For a long time we've been told there is no voter fraud, or when someone is caught, it's only GOP doing it. The question is, how many people aren't caught?
Post anything that says this anywhere. What you will find is the difference between None and the fact that there are some 258 million people of voting age. So the lack of comprehension skills by some people at what 1 or 1,000 means vs 258 million votes is never short of amazing.
 
The assumption here is that Democrats would bemoan one of their own being punished for crimes and act like hypocrites. MAGAs assume that from libs since that is exactly what MAGA would do. The opposite is true here. Dems are fully supportive of punishing these frauds no matter the political persuasion.
 
Last edited:
Still not seeing what point you are trying to make. Yes, the courts found no evidence of voter fraud in the last presidential election. There is evidence of fraud here, so, duh?
The didn't hear the cases. Only in Arizona they did. Don't twist the court hearings. The courts didn't continue with the investigation into the vote counts. But who blames them, every damn city in the US had been burned and looted for month prior with left wing nuts. They take the cases and investigate them, if there was fraud then can you image what would happen? No Judge would want their name on that. They took the easy way out and just said that Trump didn't provide enough evidence to warrant a recount.
 
Post anything that says this anywhere. What you will find is the difference between None and the fact that there are some 258 million people of voting age. So the lack of comprehension skills by some people at what 1 or 1,000 means vs 258 million votes is never short of amazing.
W won the presidency by 537 votes in 2000.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sharky1203
The didn't hear the cases. Only in Arizona they did. Don't twist the court hearings. The courts didn't continue with the investigation into the vote counts. But who blames them, every damn city in the US had been burned and looted for month prior with left wing nuts. They take the cases and investigate them, if there was fraud then can you image what would happen? No Judge would want their name on that. They took the easy way out and just said that Trump didn't provide enough evidence to warrant a recount.
OK, I've seen enough. Ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
The Western Journal?
Cracking Up Lol GIF
 
A person being charged with voter fraud is a sign the system is working. A riot to overthrow the results of an election after being litigated in the courts is another matter.
So, when we get record turnout for voting in Georgia after new laws are put in place, it's a sign that the new laws were good and not the horse shit screams of "Jim Crow 2.0" as we were led to believe by nuts on the left, correct?
 
So, when we get record turnout for voting in Georgia after new laws are put in place, it's a sign that the new laws were good and not the horse shit screams of "Jim Crow 2.0" as we were led to believe by nuts on the left, correct?
Sure
 
The didn't hear the cases. Only in Arizona they did. Don't twist the court hearings. The courts didn't continue with the investigation into the vote counts. But who blames them, every damn city in the US had been burned and looted for month prior with left wing nuts. They take the cases and investigate them, if there was fraud then can you image what would happen? No Judge would want their name on that. They took the easy way out and just said that Trump didn't provide enough evidence to warrant a recount.

It's not the courts job to investigate anything. It's the court's job to hear evidence and decide which evidence weighs more.

Trump was never able to present any real evidence.
 
Nope no voter fraud at all. Nothing to see here.


Seems more like "registration fraud" than fraudulent votes.

GOP Chairman out here in CO actually filed a false absentee ballot for his GF. Got charged and pled guilty.

Blamed a "diabetic episode".

Again - not some random dude off the street: the Chairman of the party.

For every Dem getting charged, it seems like we have 10x more from the GOP. All of them are bad, but pretending there is some massive Democratic scheme in place is utter nonsense, and is not supported by the facts.
 
Most of us here prefer opinions that are influenced by actual facts instead of lame brain already disproven conspiracy theories.

Nice change of pace with the new user account though, Rico.
So, we are now changing the definition of opinion to "based on facts." News flash, opinion is one's personal take on any situation.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
Seems more like "registration fraud" than fraudulent votes.

GOP Chairman out here in CO actually filed a false absentee ballot for his GF. Got charged and pled guilty.

Blamed a "diabetic episode".

Again - not some random dude off the street: the Chairman of the party.

For every Dem getting charged, it seems like we have 10x more from the GOP. All of them are bad, but pretending there is some massive Democratic scheme in place is utter nonsense, and is not supported by the facts.
So there's no evidence they voted, or intended to vote? They just wanted to see if they could get away with fraudulent registrations? Dude, you really are a piece of work. Bless your heart.
 
So there's no evidence they voted, or intended to vote? They just wanted to see if they could get away with fraudulent registrations?
Where did I claim pushing fraudulent registrations was "ok"?

If there were fraudulent votes to go with fake registrations, where are the charges?
 
Seems more like "registration fraud" than fraudulent votes.

GOP Chairman out here in CO actually filed a false absentee ballot for his GF. Got charged and pled guilty.

Blamed a "diabetic episode".

Again - not some random dude off the street: the Chairman of the party.

For every Dem getting charged, it seems like we have 10x more from the GOP. All of them are bad, but pretending there is some massive Democratic scheme in place is utter nonsense, and is not supported by the facts.
Don't think anyone in the GOP were dragging garbage bags of ballots though.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
So, we are now changing the definition of opinion to "based on facts." News flash, opinion is one's personal take on any situation.

You can opine that the sky is candy apple red, but that doesn’t make it a valid opinion or a reasonable opinion. And like most of your opinions here, it completely lacks corroborating evidence and verifiable facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SocraticIshmael
I did

The charges were on "registrations"
Missed this part?

Something commendable is the charges against Ibezim are being filed by a state attorney general, Matthew J. Platkin, who is a Democrat. Platkin's office is also going after a specific voter, too.

A former candidate for mayor of Plainfield has been charged after allegedly bringing a trash bag filled with nearly 1,000 bogus voter registration applications to a post office in Elizabeth, to submit them to Union County's Board of Elections. https://t.co/qi7LsuZLhG pic.twitter.com/VQoIB8gI5B
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT