ADVERTISEMENT

Scheme or Personnel

Oldgold51

Team MVP
Aug 16, 2015
246
820
93
3 times in a row, in BIG games, the Michigan State title game, last year’s Penn State game and last night’s game, the Iowa Defense has allowed the opposing team to methodically drive the ball the length of the field very late in the game to win.

In each instance, someone needed to make a play. No one did - not even close.

Is this ‘primarily’ a scheme problem, “bend don’t break” not working against late in the game “do or die” drives or is it personnel?

Damn frustrating to watch!
 
It’s very hard to consistently stop good teams when they get 4 downs to get 10 yards every time. Even harder when it’s the end of the 4th and it’s not a pure 2 minute drill. Our offense has two chances to make that a 2 possession game and stalled both times. Need to help the d there.
 
It’s very hard to consistently stop good teams when they get 4 downs to get 10 yards every time. Even harder when it’s the end of the 4th and it’s not a pure 2 minute drill. Our offense has two chances to make that a 2 possession game and stalled both times. Need to help the d there.
Yep, after Wisky got 2 1st downs, it was 4 down category
 
3 times in a row, in BIG games, the Michigan State title game, last year’s Penn State game and last night’s game, the Iowa Defense has allowed the opposing team to methodically drive the ball the length of the field very late in the game to win.

In each instance, someone needed to make a play. No one did - not even close.

Is this ‘primarily’ a scheme problem, “bend don’t break” not working against late in the game “do or die” drives or is it personnel?

Damn frustrating to watch!
S-T-A-F-F!!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: iowa surfer
I have been saying for several years that Iowa does not have difference makers on either side of the ball. We have decent players but no game changers.
 
Lack of playmakers and lack of playcallers. Shows up in these Wisconsin games. We've won other big ones, but it's obvious Wisconsin is built solely to beat us. It's there main focus and obsession. Showed up against MSU in the btcg and they are built like us. Iowa is clearly not the best at their own style of play. What is this teams identity?
 
3 times in a row, in BIG games, the Michigan State title game, last year’s Penn State game and last night’s game, the Iowa Defense has allowed the opposing team to methodically drive the ball the length of the field very late in the game to win.

In each instance, someone needed to make a play. No one did - not even close.

Is this ‘primarily’ a scheme problem, “bend don’t break” not working against late in the game “do or die” drives or is it personnel?

Damn frustrating to watch!
Did we ever bliz and if so when? Didn't seem we pressured the QB in the 4th quarter.
 
Did we ever bliz and if so when? Didn't seem we pressured the QB in the 4th quarter.
anyone on here that wants to question parker needs to get laughed off here :)

we should be damn thankful for the parkers. I love how people want to whine about everything after a loss. D is NOT the reason we don't achieve greatness!
 
anyone on here that wants to question parker needs to get laughed off here :)

we should be damn thankful for the parkers. I love how people want to whine about everything after a loss. D is NOT the reason we don't achieve greatness!
The elite coordinators don't chase wide receivers with 240 pound linebackers, ever.They also don't play standard 4-3 99.9% of the time. I'll hang up and listen.
 
Have you seen how much rotating the D-line does? Who starts the game doesn't mean very much.
AJ had six snaps in first half vs ISU. That matters. Nice to hear Gus openly question how he isn't starting. We'll probably only get 1 year of AJ as a starter and we wonder why top recruits won't come here?! Well I don't...
 
AJ is going to be the best DE to play at Iowa by the time he is done imo. He is a difference maker now. Thinking back to Saturday I only remember one snap where AJ widened and made the OT play in space. Heck, I only remember one snap where any DE did. I’m sure they did more but it was not enough imo. It was almost as if they were too worried about protecting the LBers instead of letting the DL play to their strengths.

To answer the OP. This teams problem is scheme.
 
IMO it is scheme. You cannot allow a college QB (today - 95% of D1 QBs are accurate without disruption) to more or less be in his comfort zone. If you do not disrupt the QB and force him out of his comfort zone/tempo bad things will happen. Thus late game drive losses on pretty much an annual basis. Ferentz/Parker will never figure it out and it does not matter how many times they fail. No guts no glory!
 
AJ is going to be the best DE to play at Iowa by the time he is done imo. He is a difference maker now. Thinking back to Saturday I only remember one snap where AJ widened and made the OT play in space. Heck, I only remember one snap where any DE did. I’m sure they did more but it was not enough imo. It was almost as if they were too worried about protecting the LBers instead of letting the DL play to their strengths.

To answer the OP. This teams problem is scheme.

It was pretty obvious that they weren't going to let Taylor beat them. They played to contain him(within reason because your never going to completely shut him down running behind that line) and take your chances on Hornibrook not being able to beat you. Gotta give him credit he did everything he need to to win. Take away the the SP flubs and I'm willing to bet Iowa wins. Playing a team as good as them you have to play clean. It's easy to sit back and second guess calls and plays when the outcome isn't what we wanted. I saw nothing wrong with schemes on either side. That being said I would have like to see a bit of pressure on the goahead drive but if you miss they score easy. If Iowa would have executed they would have won that football game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotthawk1964
3 times in a row, in BIG games, the Michigan State title game, last year’s Penn State game and last night’s game, the Iowa Defense has allowed the opposing team to methodically drive the ball the length of the field very late in the game to win.

In each instance, someone needed to make a play. No one did - not even close.

Is this ‘primarily’ a scheme problem, “bend don’t break” not working against late in the game “do or die” drives or is it personnel?

Damn frustrating to watch!

If you think the game was lost on that drive, you were not paying attention.
 
It was pretty obvious that they weren't going to let Taylor beat them. They played to contain him(within reason because your never going to completely shut him down running behind that line) and take your chances on Hornibrook not being able to beat you. Gotta give him credit he did everything he need to to win. Take away the the SP flubs and I'm willing to bet Iowa wins. Playing a team as good as them you have to play clean. It's easy to sit back and second guess calls and plays when the outcome isn't what we wanted. I saw nothing wrong with schemes on either side. That being said I would have like to see a bit of pressure on the goahead drive but if you miss they score easy. If Iowa would have executed they would have won that football game.

I get that and totally understand that angle. However, you have to play your strengths as well. I am still shocked Iowa's DL did not make any of the Wisconsin tackles play in space with the speed/athletic ability Iowa's DE's have.

By no means do I think Iowa's defense is to blame for this loss. They are not. That reward goes to the other two phases of the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mlee3553
I get that and totally understand that angle. However, you have to play your strengths as well. I am still shocked Iowa's DL did not make any of the Wisconsin tackles play in space with the speed/athletic ability Iowa's DE's have.

By no means do I think Iowa's defense is to blame for this loss. They are not. That reward goes to the other two phases of the game.
It doesn’t seem like we’re giving Wisconsin’s line much credit . I fully expect all 5 of them to be drafted fairly high, I think I’ve heard 3 could be first rounders.

This is fairly simple to me. We lost because we made critical mistakes and Wisconsin did not. Between two fairly even teams, that’s the difference.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT