ADVERTISEMENT

Scottie Pippen Takes Aim at Michael Jordan in New Book

dgordo

HR Legend
Nov 15, 2001
26,706
38,806
113
Chicago
Nov. 3, 2021

Scottie Pippen’s new memoir, “Unguarded,” is a master class in settling scores, or creating new ones.
Beginning in the prologue, Pippen expresses anger at Michael Jordan over “The Last Dance,” the 2020 ESPN documentary on the 1990s Chicago Bulls, which Pippen writes “glorified Michael Jordan while not giving nearly enough praise to me and my proud teammates.” Pippen gets more caustic from there.
“How dare Michael treat us that way after everything we did for him and his precious brand,” Pippen writes, adding, “To make things worse, Michael received $10 million for his role in the doc while my teammates and I didn’t earn a dime.” (Pippen and several Bulls players appeared on camera for the documentary. It has not been publicly disclosed how much Jordan, whose company Jump 23 was part of the project, made for the series.)
In response to Jordan calling Pippen “selfish” in the documentary for delaying a foot surgery and asking to be traded, Pippen writes, “You want to know what selfish is? Selfish is retiring right before the start of training camp when it is too late for the organization to sign free agents,” a reference to Jordan’s unexpected first retirement after his father’s death. He calls Jordan hypocritical and insensitive. And he criticizes Jordan for his behavior toward co-workers: “Seeing again how poorly Michael treated his teammates, I cringed, as I did back then.”
“Michael and I aren’t close and never have been,” Pippen writes.
That’s just in the opening pages. In the rest of the book, Pippen takes shots at everyone from Charles Barkley (“wasn’t dedicated enough to win a championship”) to Isiah Thomas (“dirty” player, “with a knack for making the most inappropriate comments”).
Pippen also tees off on the former Bulls Coach Phil Jackson about the famed moment in 1994 when Pippen refused to re-enter a playoff game for the last 1.8 seconds after Jackson drew up a play for Toni Kukoc instead of for him. After telling Dan Patrick in a radio interview earlier this year that it was racist for Jackson to have done so, Pippen backs off that assertion in the book. Even so, Pippen writes that Jackson humiliated him and that “the moment of truth had come, and he had abandoned me.”
As open as Pippen is in the book, he seemed far less willing to engage with the material in an interview. The conversation over a video conference became terse, and Pippen canceled a photo shoot afterward.
This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

You come from very humble roots. You weren’t recruited by a huge school. You were underpaid compared with market value for a significant period of your career. Is there any point in your life when you didn’t feel overlooked? Because this book seems to stem from a lot of you wanting to write your own story and wanting to set the record straight.
I think I can say there was no part in my life that I felt overlooked. That may be your take of what you took from reading the book, but I didn’t feel like I was overlooked. I just felt like it was a different journey than most people have traveled — who’s played on a professional level, who’s had to go to college.

From the opening pages of the book, you take a cudgel to Michael Jordan. Have you always felt this way and just kept that inside or did those feelings really come into focus after watching “The Last Dance”?
I think he’s always separated himself a little bit from what I consider the traditional team concept, in some sense. And I think “The Last Dance” just put the icing on the cake. So it was all about him at the end of the day.

One of the most interesting lines is when you write, “We didn’t win six championships because he got on guys, we won in spite of his getting on guys.” And I thought that was really interesting, because Jordan’s treatment of teammates has long been heralded as a virtue. Did you find it to be unproductive?
Well, I can’t say I found it to be unproductive, because it was productive.

But you also said that you guys won in spite of it.
Well, we won when he retired. We didn’t win a title, but obviously we didn’t have a full roster, so.

Do you worry that your book will create a permanent split between you two?
To answer your question, no.

Have you given him any sort of heads up about what you’re saying about him?
No.

You write that Isiah Thomas reached out after the documentary aired and wanted to declare a truce with you. You said that you were unwilling to speak to him. Why is that?
Well, I played in the league for 18 years and there was never a relationship there. I’ve been out of the league for 15 years, so why now? It’s not like we’re crossing each other’s paths anymore.

You write that the book pushed you where you needed to be pushed, even to some places you didn’t want to go. What’s an example of a place that you really needed to push to talk about? What places didn’t you want to go?
I don’t want to specifically point that out. I think you should read the book and figure it out. I’m not going to make your job easy by getting some controversy on that.

Your interview with Dan Patrick in the spring made a lot of headlines. You said it was racist for Phil Jackson not to draw up the play for you in the famous 1.8 second game. You walked that back in the book. After you made those comments, did you hear from former teammates about it? What were you hearing from people and what made you walk that back in the book?
What made me walk it back?
Yeah.
I didn’t walk it back. I just didn’t have it in the book. I said it was probably not right for me to say that about Phil being racist at this stage. It’s water under the bridge now. But at that point in time, based on where I was as a player, the year that I was having, I thought it was a bad move on his part.

When was the last time you spoke to Phil Jackson?
I can’t recall.

Just to clarify, because I just want to make sure I don’t put words in your mouth. You don’t think that Phil was racist in designating Toni Kukoc to take that last shot?
Did I say it? What are you asking?

OK, in your book, and I’m quoting you here — —
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Have you heard me say that I said that?

Well, yeah, I watched the interview.
OK, so I said it. Now what are you asking me?

In your book you write: “I was so hurt when he picked Toni over me that I needed to come up with an explanation for why I was rejected. For why, after everything I had given to the Chicago Bulls, I wasn’t allowed to have my moment. So I told myself at the time that Phil’s decision must have been racially motivated, and I allowed myself to believe that lie for nearly 30 years. Only when I saw my words in print did it dawn on me how wrong I was.” So you call it a lie. So I just want to clarify exactly what it is. Do you or do you not believe that Phil was being racist when he drew up that play?
I feel like it was a moment where he did me wrong. How about that? How about I answer your question that way.

OK, fair enough. What do you think is a big misconception about you? Is there something that people don’t know about you that you would like them to get to know about you?
I’m private, so there’s not much you can learn about me.

 
Nov. 3, 2021

Scottie Pippen’s new memoir, “Unguarded,” is a master class in settling scores, or creating new ones.
Beginning in the prologue, Pippen expresses anger at Michael Jordan over “The Last Dance,” the 2020 ESPN documentary on the 1990s Chicago Bulls, which Pippen writes “glorified Michael Jordan while not giving nearly enough praise to me and my proud teammates.” Pippen gets more caustic from there.
“How dare Michael treat us that way after everything we did for him and his precious brand,” Pippen writes, adding, “To make things worse, Michael received $10 million for his role in the doc while my teammates and I didn’t earn a dime.” (Pippen and several Bulls players appeared on camera for the documentary. It has not been publicly disclosed how much Jordan, whose company Jump 23 was part of the project, made for the series.)
In response to Jordan calling Pippen “selfish” in the documentary for delaying a foot surgery and asking to be traded, Pippen writes, “You want to know what selfish is? Selfish is retiring right before the start of training camp when it is too late for the organization to sign free agents,” a reference to Jordan’s unexpected first retirement after his father’s death. He calls Jordan hypocritical and insensitive. And he criticizes Jordan for his behavior toward co-workers: “Seeing again how poorly Michael treated his teammates, I cringed, as I did back then.”
“Michael and I aren’t close and never have been,” Pippen writes.
That’s just in the opening pages. In the rest of the book, Pippen takes shots at everyone from Charles Barkley (“wasn’t dedicated enough to win a championship”) to Isiah Thomas (“dirty” player, “with a knack for making the most inappropriate comments”).
Pippen also tees off on the former Bulls Coach Phil Jackson about the famed moment in 1994 when Pippen refused to re-enter a playoff game for the last 1.8 seconds after Jackson drew up a play for Toni Kukoc instead of for him. After telling Dan Patrick in a radio interview earlier this year that it was racist for Jackson to have done so, Pippen backs off that assertion in the book. Even so, Pippen writes that Jackson humiliated him and that “the moment of truth had come, and he had abandoned me.”
As open as Pippen is in the book, he seemed far less willing to engage with the material in an interview. The conversation over a video conference became terse, and Pippen canceled a photo shoot afterward.
This interview has been condensed and edited for clarity.

You come from very humble roots. You weren’t recruited by a huge school. You were underpaid compared with market value for a significant period of your career. Is there any point in your life when you didn’t feel overlooked? Because this book seems to stem from a lot of you wanting to write your own story and wanting to set the record straight.
I think I can say there was no part in my life that I felt overlooked. That may be your take of what you took from reading the book, but I didn’t feel like I was overlooked. I just felt like it was a different journey than most people have traveled — who’s played on a professional level, who’s had to go to college.

From the opening pages of the book, you take a cudgel to Michael Jordan. Have you always felt this way and just kept that inside or did those feelings really come into focus after watching “The Last Dance”?
I think he’s always separated himself a little bit from what I consider the traditional team concept, in some sense. And I think “The Last Dance” just put the icing on the cake. So it was all about him at the end of the day.

One of the most interesting lines is when you write, “We didn’t win six championships because he got on guys, we won in spite of his getting on guys.” And I thought that was really interesting, because Jordan’s treatment of teammates has long been heralded as a virtue. Did you find it to be unproductive?
Well, I can’t say I found it to be unproductive, because it was productive.

But you also said that you guys won in spite of it.
Well, we won when he retired. We didn’t win a title, but obviously we didn’t have a full roster, so.

Do you worry that your book will create a permanent split between you two?
To answer your question, no.

Have you given him any sort of heads up about what you’re saying about him?
No.

You write that Isiah Thomas reached out after the documentary aired and wanted to declare a truce with you. You said that you were unwilling to speak to him. Why is that?
Well, I played in the league for 18 years and there was never a relationship there. I’ve been out of the league for 15 years, so why now? It’s not like we’re crossing each other’s paths anymore.

You write that the book pushed you where you needed to be pushed, even to some places you didn’t want to go. What’s an example of a place that you really needed to push to talk about? What places didn’t you want to go?
I don’t want to specifically point that out. I think you should read the book and figure it out. I’m not going to make your job easy by getting some controversy on that.

Your interview with Dan Patrick in the spring made a lot of headlines. You said it was racist for Phil Jackson not to draw up the play for you in the famous 1.8 second game. You walked that back in the book. After you made those comments, did you hear from former teammates about it? What were you hearing from people and what made you walk that back in the book?
What made me walk it back?
Yeah.
I didn’t walk it back. I just didn’t have it in the book. I said it was probably not right for me to say that about Phil being racist at this stage. It’s water under the bridge now. But at that point in time, based on where I was as a player, the year that I was having, I thought it was a bad move on his part.

When was the last time you spoke to Phil Jackson?
I can’t recall.

Just to clarify, because I just want to make sure I don’t put words in your mouth. You don’t think that Phil was racist in designating Toni Kukoc to take that last shot?
Did I say it? What are you asking?

OK, in your book, and I’m quoting you here — —
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. Have you heard me say that I said that?

Well, yeah, I watched the interview.
OK, so I said it. Now what are you asking me?

In your book you write: “I was so hurt when he picked Toni over me that I needed to come up with an explanation for why I was rejected. For why, after everything I had given to the Chicago Bulls, I wasn’t allowed to have my moment. So I told myself at the time that Phil’s decision must have been racially motivated, and I allowed myself to believe that lie for nearly 30 years. Only when I saw my words in print did it dawn on me how wrong I was.” So you call it a lie. So I just want to clarify exactly what it is. Do you or do you not believe that Phil was being racist when he drew up that play?
I feel like it was a moment where he did me wrong. How about that? How about I answer your question that way.

OK, fair enough. What do you think is a big misconception about you? Is there something that people don’t know about you that you would like them to get to know about you?
I’m private, so there’s not much you can learn about me.

LOL. What a baby.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye54545
Instead of being grateful he landed with the Bulls and had MJ to drag him to find success he turns around and bites the hand that fed him. As a huge fan of the Bulls at that time I always felt Pip would have been just another player had be been drafted anywhere else. He didn't have the drive or work ethic to excel, Michael had to pull it out of him. He sure didn't do much after he left Chicago.
 
Pippen has obviously made some horrible financial decisions in his life. He seems to be burning every bridge for a few dollars.

the guy will be selling selfies with you at a Mississippi Casino soon.
Coming Soon...

Scottie Pippen - as himself - live in Times Square
 
There is some truth in what Scottie says, but unfortunately its easy to write it off since he has come off as vindictive for a while. But anyone who thinks that Michael Jordan isn't a narcissist is looking through rose colored glasses. All you need to do is listen to his rambling HOF entrance speech to understand that.

And he is also correct that Jordan didn't win those championships on his own. Look how good the Bulls were in the two years during his first retirement. They didn't win a title, but they were contenders in the East. There was clearly a lot of talent on that team even without Jordan.
 
Last edited:
Instead of being grateful he landed with the Bulls and had MJ to drag him to find success he turns around and bites the hand that fed him. As a huge fan of the Bulls at that time I always felt Pip would have been just another player had be been drafted anywhere else. He didn't have the drive or work ethic to excel, Michael had to pull it out of him. He sure didn't do much after he left Chicago.
Come on. This sort of Jordan fanboy take is ridiculous. He was 34 years old when he left Chicago. That's old by today's NBA standards. 20 years ago it was ancient.

Pippen was a great player and would have been almost anywhere he went. Did it help that he went to a team where he was surrounded by talent? Of course. The same is true for any athlete in professional sports. The more talent they have around them, the more easily they can shine.
 
Come on. This sort of Jordan fanboy take is ridiculous. He was 34 years old when he left Chicago. That's old by today's NBA standards. 20 years ago it was ancient.

Pippen was a great player and would have been almost anywhere he went. Did it help that he went to a team where he was surrounded by talent? Of course. The same is true for any athlete in professional sports. The more talent they have around them, the more easily they can shine.
Not sure how old you are but there were many Bulls fans that were not too happy with Scottie for being as soft as he was.

I stand by the comment that MJ had to drag him to success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: onlyTheObvious
For what its worth, Scottie was a c-hair away from winning it all in Portland when he was like 35. IIRC, they completely blew a Western Conference Finals game 7
 
Books that are only warm fuzzies don't sell. You need controversy to sell books and make money. As anyone that has followed Scottie's career knows, Scottie needs money going back to that contract he stupidly accepted from Krause. So he writes a book that will ruffle some feathers but make him some money. He's done in the NBA, so what does he have to worry about? His position as team ambassador for the Bulls didn't really pan out to anything.

Jordan will of course take some of these comments as an affront to him. But does anybody today really think that they were best friends back then? Jordan doesn't seem to care about anyone that isn't himself, not even his ex-wife or kids(maybe?). About the only thing he cared about was beating everyone else in the world at any competition.

But for everyone saying that Scottie wasn't that great of a player, you're fooling yourselves. He wasn't one of the top 5 players in the league at any point in his career(Jordan, Barkley, Hakeem, Malone, Ewing, Robinson, and Shaq are all better individually), but he was still damn good. And also consider that the list I just gave was four centers, 2 PFs, and Jordan. So Scottie was likely the best SF in the league for most of the 90s. Clyde Drexler and Reggie Miller are probably the only non-Jordan SG/SFs that I would consider taking over Scottie during the height of his career and that would only be if I didn't already have Jordan on my team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Jordan=GOAT. Enough said. If you are the GOAT who cares about the rest. No one was even close to the competitor that Jordan was.
 
He's a weird guy, and he's always been kind of a weird guy. There's a ton of truth in much of what he says, and the gist of it is rarely disputed by others who were there.

However, everything gets filtered through a strange lens of resentment, paranoia, ego, etc. And I think it can change based around what he's feeling at any given moment in time. I don't know if it's a mental health thing, or just the case that he's one of those people who are a difficult and exhausting person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BEAVERDALEHAWK
I'm sure their are insider details in the book that we don't know about, but if Scottie thinks that telling everyone that Michael belittled his teammates, demoralized many of them, and was generally an all around asshole is new information he's in for a rude awakening. It's pretty well known on who Micheal is and how he treated his "friends" and teammates. He also didn't make any apologies for it. He also led the Bulls to 6 NBA championships which is why people dealt with it. It may not be the nicest method of leadership, but it worked. Fortunately, most of us don't deal with Jordan on a daily or even once in a lifetime basis so we don't have to worry about how he wasn't nice to people. Note: He also played basketball the way it is supposed to be played and never pulled himself out of a game so he could cry about not getting the ball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LuteHawk
Did Tonto trash The Long Ranger?
Did Robin trash Batman?

It is necessary sometimes to accept your
role in life and be thankful for your blessings
.
Will Pippen & Jordan be at the same dinner
table for Thanksgiving Day this year? NO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy McGill
I watched nearly every Bulls game in the 90's that I could. Pippen was a great talent, and if it wasn't for BS call in the playoffs he would have won a championship without Michael. That being said, .....dude grow up. Scottie, quit acting like a prima donna. Jordan is a stud. A jerk, for sure. But you have to deal with cards you are delt with in life. You are always going to second fiddle to Jordan. Would you rather have been best player on a team that never won 6 championships?
 
Pippen was a great talent, and if it wasn't for BS call in the playoffs he would have won a championship without Michael.
img1.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tenacious E
Scottie P's daughter went to the University of Iowa and was cited for public urination. Trump finds that more fascinating.
 
Someone call the Waaambulance. What an envious a$$ mofo?

Such a shame as Scottie was a great player and was probably underrated due to playing with MJ. But MJ was the main reason those Bulls teams were champions and he gets the credit he deserves for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy McGill
This dude seems miserable

So does MJ, to be honest. He’s the undisputed GOAT and he feels the need to regularly remind everyone of it. Not to mention continuously beat his old foes into further submission and gamble on anything and everything. The very attributes that made MJ ruthlessly dominant and great as a player also make him petty, arrogant and cold as a person.
 
So does MJ, to be honest. He’s the undisputed GOAT and he feels the need to regularly remind everyone of it. Not to mention continuously beat his old foes into further submission and gamble on anything and everything. The very attributes that made MJ ruthlessly dominant and great as a player also make him petty, arrogant and cold as a person.
yeah, agreed. To be ice cold successful like that, you generally are a shitty person.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT