ADVERTISEMENT

Senate passes bill to make Juneteenth, day commemorating the end of slavery in Texas, a federal holiday

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
The Senate on Tuesday unanimously passed a measure that would establish a federal holiday for Juneteenth, the day that marks the end of slavery in Texas.
The bill now heads to the Democratic-led House, where it is likely to be approved, although the timing remains uncertain.
Unanimous Senate passage was an anticlimactic culmination to a long effort to commemorate Juneteenth, the day that enslaved Black people in Galveston, Tex., received news on June 19, 1865, that they had been freed by the Emancipation Proclamation — more than two years after President Abraham Lincoln had signed it.
“Juneteenth commemorates the moment some of the last formerly enslaved people in the nation learned they were free,” said Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.). “Making Juneteenth a federal holiday is a major step forward to recognize the wrongs of the past — but we must continue to work to ensure equal justice and fulfill the promise of the Emancipation Proclamation and our Constitution.”
This updated handout photo provided by the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum on June 8 shows a signed copy of Emancipation Proclamation. The Library, in Springfield, Ill., will mark Juneteenth, the holiday commemorating the end of slavery in Texas, by displaying it. (AP)
The effort gained significant ground in the last Congress, but a July 2020 attempt to pass the bill establishing the holiday was foiled when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) objected to its passage and GOP Senate leaders opted not to expend scarce floor time to get around his objection.
Johnson objected to the cost of granting federal workers an additional paid holiday, and he proposed amendments that would offset the cost by either removing Columbus Day from the list of paid federal holidays or subtracting a day from federal workers’ paid leave.
That proposal prompted sharp criticism from conservative commentators such as Tucker Carlson, who last year accused Johnson and another Republican, Sen. James Lankford (Okla.), of “trying to cancel Columbus Day.”
In a statement Tuesday, Johnson said that while he remained concerned about the cost, which he pegged at $600 million a year, he did not intend to object again.
“While it still seems strange that having taxpayers provide federal employees paid time off is now required to celebrate the end of slavery, it is clear that there is no appetite in Congress to further discuss the matter,” he said.
The Congressional Budget Office has not delivered an official cost estimate for the bill. Johnson’s estimate is based on the wages and salary that would be paid to the federal workforce for the day off, plus overtime for those who would work that day.
Had Johnson not withdrawn his objection, the legislation probably would have faced a tougher path to reaching the Senate floor, since bills that do not have unanimous consent require more time for debate, and the chamber’s leaders have focused that time instead on voting rights, infrastructure and other key parts of their legislative agenda.
ADVERTISING
The lead Democratic sponsor of the bill, Sen. Edward J. Markey (Mass.), was presiding over the Senate when the bill passed.
“For far too long, the story of our country’s history has been incomplete as we have failed to acknowledge, address, and come to grips with our nation’s original sin of slavery,” Markey said in a statement after the vote. He said the legislation’s passage “will address this long-ignored gap in our history, recognize the wrong that was done, acknowledge the pain and suffering of generations of slaves and their descendants, and finally celebrate their freedom.”
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) hailed the bill’s passage Tuesday in a tweet that noted Juneteenth has been a Texas state holiday for more than 40 years. “Now more than ever, we need to learn from our history and continue to form a more perfect union,” he said.
Wade Henderson, interim president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, applauded the Senate for acting.
“But holidays alone are not enough — there is still much work to be done to build equity, to undo systemic racism, to atone for centuries of brutal treatment of enslaved Africans in America and their descendants,” Henderson said.
Other groups supporting the legislation include the NAACP and the National Juneteenth Observance Foundation.
The House bill, sponsored by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Tex.), currently has 166 additional co-sponsors, including two Republicans.
A senior House Democratic aide, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to comment on internal discussions, said the House leadership is “supportive” and reviewing the Senate-passed bill.

 
So the only thing the Senate can agree on is granting themselves another day off-wow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ParkerHawk
Not shocking that Johnson was the sticking point. John Cornyn was on board, which means Cornyn is starting to pay attention to the demographics of Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Quite the list of guys who voted against this. Ronny Jackson, Paul Gosar, Mo Brooks, Andrew Clyde, Mike Rogers, Chip Roy...Even MTG and Lauren Boebert didn't vote against this. Although, they might be in the five who didn't vote today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Jesus Christ. We learned all that, just didn’t have to Blame ourselves as oppressors, write the Cleveland’s Indians to get them to change their name etc
I hate to break this to you, but.... They are changing their name after the end of this season.
 
They do teach that. I’m fine with that, I’m not fine with them trying to make whitekids feel guilty.
I don't think anyone is trying to make white kids feel guilty, but it's impossible to teach those things without talking about why it happened and who participated in those atrocities. What would be going too far?

Also as a former teacher I know that parents will have different interpretations of the ban, some will be fine with teaching about those things while others will believe it's too controversial. Who will be making the decisions about what is divisive?
 
I don't think anyone is trying to make white kids feel guilty, but it's impossible to teach those things without talking about why it happened and who participated in those atrocities. What would be going too far?

Also as a former teacher I know that parents will have different interpretations of the ban, some will be fine with teaching about those things while others will believe it's too controversial. Who will be making the decisions about what is divisive?
Individual school boards I would assume.
 
I completely understand Cornyn voting for this holiday, which for years has been celebrated in Texas. And it was taught in the mandatory History of Texas which is a standard part of the statewide curriculum in 7th grade.
It was always referenced as a not so stellar part of the Lone Star State's otherwise "proud" past. They never hid it but they never put it front and center, either.
Juneteenth is important in Texas and from my observation when I lived there, has been treated respectfully by everyone.
 
I'm sure you realized that the last slaves to be freed didn't find out they were free until two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. We understand your need to mock that even if you dont.
Well this has nothing to do with what I posted.
 
Our employer won’t add it.

just another way to pay government employees not to work. Real tough piece of legislation.

tomorrow they will work on a bill to pay farmers not to farm.
 


ccc572a22ad868db657987dc6a6a5ed0.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuck C
I don't think anyone is trying to make white kids feel guilty, but it's impossible to teach those things without talking about why it happened and who participated in those atrocities. What would be going too far?

Also as a former teacher I know that parents will have different interpretations of the ban, some will be fine with teaching about those things while others will believe it's too controversial. Who will be making the decisions about what is divisive?
Does talking about who participated in slave trade include Africans who kidnapped the slaves and sold them to Europeans or other agents? Some of them were their own neighbors, but a lot of times from other ethnic groups.
 
Does talking about who participated in slave trade include Africans who kidnapped the slaves and sold them to Europeans or other agents? Some of them were their own neighbors, but a lot of times from other ethnic groups.
As a lower elementary teacher, my discussion with students about slavery was usually in conjunction with President's day. I explained what slavery was and how Lincoln freed the slaves. I didn't go into a lot of detail. The lessons I taught about segregation related to MLK day. I have no idea about the amount of detail the middle and high school teachers delved into, but I trust that the social studies/history teachers at my old school explained that there were many people involved in the business of slavery. The fear of what your children will be taught K-12 about racism is unfounded. Teachers are pretty careful about not causing controversy. Many teachers are Republicans/conservatives. In my experience most of them, in Iowa, are in the center like the rest of the country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Does talking about who participated in slave trade include Africans who kidnapped the slaves and sold them to Europeans or other agents? Some of them were their own neighbors, but a lot of times from other ethnic groups.
Ya, it was pretty horrible all the way around.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT