Senior USAID security officials put on leave after refusing Musk’s DOGE access to agency systems
- Thread starter pjhawk
- Start date
Looks like uber and lyft has some driving candidates headed their way.
“If Harris wins, I’m going to prison” -Elon Musk
This dude needs kicked the **** out of our country
This dude needs kicked the **** out of our country
Gold
You gonna fly up to the space station and rescue the crew?
Politico’s Payroll Mishap Shines Light On USAID Ties
Employees at Politico were caught by surprise when their paychecks failed to arrive for the latest pay period. According to internal emails shared by staff, company leadership pointed to a “technic…
thedeepdive.ca
Karoline Leavitt at her presser just said the 8 million USAID funding of Politico has been cancelled immediately.Politico’s Payroll Mishap Shines Light On USAID Ties
Employees at Politico were caught by surprise when their paychecks failed to arrive for the latest pay period. According to internal emails shared by staff, company leadership pointed to a “technic…
The US has no business at all funding private news outlets. I cant believe this was happening at all.
To be clear, $44k in USAID funding to Politico. The biggest shares of the $8m came from HHS and DoI. The overwhelming majority of the awarded funds are essentially electronic subscriptions (eg, "Politico Pro"), over a period of several years. https://www.usaspending.gov/search/?hash=ce007c986b96d38c983ae10dc0614b6a
Translation: this is a ginormous nothing-burger. Other than the fact that government employees will just have to sit at their desks and read the free content like the rest of us schlubs.
Edit: funnily enough, the Executive Office of the President also has a number of subscription contract awards, in amounts substantially more than the USAID subscription..
Last edited:
and others, though in fairness these are likely national licenses of nearly unlimited users. But yeah, i view politico as basically just sort of light entertainment fare that I'd never pay extra for.
It's certainly not as important as having a subscription to, say, Lexis or Westlaw.
I will acknowledge - it does raise an interesting question in my mind that had not really occurred to me before. just how important a customer is "the government" when it comes to news and trade publications, which are so ubiquitous that they most of their content can be accessed without charge by the general public?
(Edit: I gotta say, this sort of evokes a great old Xfiles episode in which Mulder makes a reference to the "Military-Industrial-Entertainment Complex")
Last edited:
I dont think the government should be subscribing, with taxpayer dollars, to any political publications. Especially one with such obvious titles such as this one. I also dont think government employees should accept them gratis either.
Pay for it or read the free version if you wish.
Lexis, Westlaw etc are non political. Not the same as you know.
How would Dems feel about the DoD paying for a Daily Wire subscription for all soldiers with taxpayer dollars?
Not simply a waste but diversion of taxpayer dollars to political entities without countervailing alternate conservative media.
While I'd probably quibble with the characterization as a political publication (actually a fair bit of good old fashioned reporting rather than just opinion pieces), I'm on the fence here. There may be very good reasons for govt officials and employees to access trade press like this.
But I have to say, i'm just a little dubious of the value proposition of the stuff behind the paywalls. It'd be fascinating to get a feel for what percentage of their non-government user-clickers are also behind-the-paywall subscribers.
My point is simply that these are (qualitatively) pretty ordinary expenses, and probably unlikely to be such as to support an inference of an unholy relationship for, say, placing stories here or in foreign editions.
Last edited:
Yep. It’s funny this is happening just as many traditional online sources are trying like hell to move MORE of their stuff behind paywalls.
Last edited:
Reporting on this says that each Politico Pro subscription cost American taxpayers 10,000 each.
NO WAY their reporting behind the paywall is worth that kind of money. At all. Sounds like a way to divert government dollars to support, via 'subscriptions', a private company that, at best, leans left.
You mean 'dumb', as in I should have known that this level of graft was occurring and not be surprised by it?
I think a better word would be 'naivete'. Guilty.
How many users per? Remember the agency has like 10000 employees worldwide. I don’t the subscription allows one person to access the content. (For comparison, I am one of a dozen licensed users on a niche subscription product at work that is very good, for which we pay about 2000).
I agree that there are very few info products worth the subscription, and none worth 10k
They have individual Pro plans and group Pro plans.
US Government Dropped Millions On D.C.’s Favorite Media Outlet — Here’s What They Spent It On
U.S. government agencies have dropped a staggering $34 million in contracts with Virginia-based news outlet Politico, mostly on subscriptions.
dailycaller.com
Honestly, setting aside the value prop, I’m still kinda underwhelmed at the idea that this is somehow sinister. (Which was the original implication). Wasteful maybe, but not sinister. And even then, usaid seems positively miserly relative to other usg entities.They have individual Pro plans and group Pro plans.
US Government Dropped Millions On D.C.’s Favorite Media Outlet — Here’s What They Spent It On
U.S. government agencies have dropped a staggering $34 million in contracts with Virginia-based news outlet Politico, mostly on subscriptions.
Oh I dont think it is sinister. I just think it is a massively irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars that most would not be supportive of if they knew.
Similar threads
