Rrrrriiiiigggghhhhhhhtttt...That's the best team in a one-team conference...
You realize that Okie St, Baylor, and TCU aren't exactly scrub teams, right? Plus, Nebraska beat MSU earlier in the year.
Rrrrriiiiigggghhhhhhhtttt...That's the best team in a one-team conference...
No they aren't. We should be in over Oklahoma as should Ohio State. The best Big 12 team would be 4th or 5th in the Big 10.No - they beat okie state, Baylor and tcu who are great.
Beat the #25 Vols at home, too. Dang it!!No - they beat okie state, Baylor and tcu who are great.
They have scrub defenses, and Oklahoma played all of them without their respective starting QBs.You realize that Okie St, Baylor, and TCU aren't exactly scrub teams, right? Plus, Nebraska beat MSU earlier in the year.
In the end, it's not football for if it was, it would be settled on the field. Instead it's a beauty pageant and Oklahoma is the hotter chick....that's the best football system we're capable of coming up with in the year 2015. UNI's division rewards the best football team...imagine that (they clearly aren't as sophisticated since they settle it on the field).i think its a fair question. i just wonder if the committee is actually pondering that
Based on what??? The eye test??? Tennessee was the best ooc win for that entire conference--NW alone proved more before conference play. I honestly think OU would be battling for 4th-5th in the B1G...said that in Sept, still true now...You realize that Okie St, Baylor, and TCU aren't exactly scrub teams, right? Plus, Nebraska beat MSU earlier in the year.
This thinking bothers me. I am totally on board with settling it on the field. But that doesn't equate to being the best team. Especially in football where the season is so short and teams only face off once.UNI's division rewards the best football team...imagine that (they clearly aren't as sophisticated since they settle it on the field).