I think you are very consistent in your non-faith faith so I would say yes.I wonder if he thinks I can refuse her service on religious grounds?
Is consistency part of these laws? I don't think they actually require that you show you have faith or that your faith has this rule.I think you are very consistent in your non-faith faith so I would say yes.
I'm curious how his views have evolved since then?
That's an interesting position with lots of ramifications.Maybe they should be ashamed for being so stupid.
I agree but your question was one of religion and law and for that I look to see what your view is on a consistent basis.Is consistency part of these laws? I don't think they actually require that you show you have faith or that your faith has this rule.
Of course then you get the government passing judgment on who is and isn't faithful and what is and isn't religious doctrine. What a mess. Better to simply not allow religious loopholes.I agree but your question was one of religion and law and for that I look to see what your view is on a consistent basis.
Should someone be able to just say it is "against my religion" or should they actually need to practice that religion? Just saying it should not be enough.
Better if you are not a person of faith but for the ones who are not as easy solution.Of course then you get the government passing judgment on who is and isn't faithful and what is and isn't religious doctrine. What a mess. Better to simply not allow religious loopholes.
And yet it's only a relatively recent concern. Has theology changed?Better if you are not a person of faith but for the ones who are not as easy solution.
Don't think theology changed, our country has and finding a balance is not easy.And yet it's only a relatively recent concern. Has theology changed?