So, F Germany, sick Phucks.

[LBoogie28]

Your inability to realize I'm making fun of you is noted.

surejan.gif

It has nothing to do with an “inability” on my end. All your responses are nonsensical. You don’t have a good read on the situation…or the topic/thread. Least surprising outcome, ever. Stay down.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

surejan.gif

It has nothing to do with an “inability” on my end. All your responses are nonsensical. You don’t have a good read on the situation…or the topic/thread. Least surprising outcome, ever. Stay down.

No it's cool, you just can't seem to figure out how or why this could be a problem. Totally normal.

 

[LBoogie28]

No it's cool, you just can't seem to figure out how or why this could be a problem. Totally normal.

Where did I post that, or anything close to that? Feel free to hit the quote button.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Where did I post that, or anything close to that? Feel free to hit the quote button.

I look forward to your threads educating others on the prevalence of acceptance towards "mi or attracted people" and think youbwill do great work in spreading knowledge.

 

[LBoogie28]

I look forward to your threads educating others on the prevalence of acceptance towards "mi or attracted people" and think youbwill do great work in spreading knowledge.

Ruh-roh. Look who can’t back anything up. More deflection (and typographical errors). Classic whiskey.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Ruh-roh. Look who can’t back anything up. More deflection (and typographical errors). Classic whiskey.

Again I'm making fun of your "what are you doing that I'm not", as I bring this to peoples attention..



Keep swinging little buddy, we will get you there.

 

[Dr. Spaceman]

You go ahead and watch your morals and values dissolve in a never ending pandering to a group of insatiably unhappy people, I will not be.

Adults can still be charged with a felony for child porn, correct?

 

[LBoogie28]

Again I'm making fun of your "what are you doing that I'm not", as I bring this to peoples attention..



Keep swinging little buddy, we will get you there.

You are correct, I am not misinforming others about a topic I hadn’t fully researched, about proposed policies in a foreign land, on a random internet message board. You have made a huge impact today. How many lives have you saved? Please quantify the difference you have made in preventing moral decay, and how that compares to my contributions.

The irony is, that it’s others that are educating you, and bringing attention to the actual proposed legislation. I’m sure that has been completely lost on you.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

Adults can still be charged with a felony for child porn, correct?

Correct.


You think extending the spectrum on the low end will lead to more usage of the high end of the spectrum?

 

[Dr. Spaceman]

Correct.


You think extending the spectrum on the low end will lead to more usage of the high end of the spectrum?

The "low end" of the spectrum has been explained to you ad nauseam in this thread.

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

The "low end" of the spectrum has been explained to you ad nauseam in this thread.

That's not an answer doctor.

 

[FlickShagwell]

Germany didn't decriminalize pedophilia and child porn.

But what if they did??? Let’s freak out about it!

 

[Joes Place]

@ihhawk you weren't wrong. The quite parts are coming out.

"Just the quite parts"

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

It's funny that I'm finishing my conversation with a dem, @Hawki97 who is giving me a mich appreciated "don't give.your company.an inch they will take a mile".....




As I flip.back to this thread and read dems try to justify that it's not a big deal.



Mental pretzels.

 

[Dr. Spaceman]

That's not an answer doctor.

It was downgraded, not decriminalized. Did you intentionally lie or get duped by the original story you posted? You’re a MAGAt Trumpanzee brain, so it could be either.

Parliament cites the reasoning presented by the bill’s draft that “parents and teachers of older children or adolescents, who have found child pornography material on them [the children] and forwarded it to other parents” were disproportionally punished by the 2021 reforms in a March press release.

Applied to a 16 year old with pics of her boyfriend?
Yeah, probably not best to hit her with a felony.

Pedophilia isn't even mentioned. You're inserting that.

On Wednesday, the Legal Affairs Committee paved the way for a reduction in the minimum penalties for “dissemination, acquisition and possession of child pornographic content”.
...
In its draft, the federal government cites feedback and demands from practice for a tightening of the penalty framework in 2021. Due to the lack of the possibility of discontinuing proceedings or disposing of them with a penalty order, it has been shown that “in proceedings involving a suspected crime at the lower end of criminal liability, this means that a reaction appropriate to the offense and guilt is no longer possible in every individual case is guaranteed". The conference of the justice ministers of the federal states also joined the demands from practice. The maximum penalties, which were also made more stringent with the 2021 reform, will be retained.


They tightened the laws in 2021, and had the unintended consequence of removing diversionary 'escape hatches' for kids with images of kids.
The point of this change is to give the prosecutors and judges leeway to use common sense.

Unwad your panties.

The maximum penalties, which were also made more stringent with the 2021 reform, will be retained.

If you’d quit dropping context we could discuss why that lesser option exists, and why it’s not a good idea to slap felonies on kids for having nekked pictures of their boyfriend on their phone.

If it's addressing issues where a couple teenagers passing nudes to one another were labeled and charged as pedos...it makes perfect sense. Unlike you evidently, I'm going to need more information before my head explodes. As of now, all the content on the google looks like it's from the Q outrage machine shaped in a way to dupe the simps. Flashy headline, minimal actual data / background.

Whiskey, You may not agree with this but this explains why they are trying to change the law. It also points out the flaws in the article you used as your source.

https://www.techarp.com/crime/germany-child-pornography-facts/

I’m not sure why you keep skipping over the part where the minimum sentence is trying to be reduced but the maximum sentence for severe cases remains in place.

You keep dropping the real context and inventing a new one to justify your initial misperception (which was deliberately created by your source).

At this point I’m not sure what would make you recognize your error.

Germany didn't decriminalize pedophilia and child porn.

You can read, correct?

 

[Whiskeydeltadeltatango]

You can read, correct?

Yawn. And each of my previous responses applies.