How is it a good bill when you are still allowing mass entries?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How is it a good bill when you are still allowing mass entries?
Because it hasn't passed and been implemented, yet.How is it a good bill when you are still allowing mass entries?
Because it hasn't passed and been implemented, yet.
HS needs $$ and resources. The people you vote for are denying those resources.
No; they don't.They have more money and resources now than when Trump was in office
We don't need more money to simply process more people...
Who voted against funding a wall while sending billions to Ukraine?No; they don't.
Your GOP buddies are refusing those resources that the Senate bill will provide.
Yes. We do.
We can allow those legally seeking asylum with legit claims in.
We can more quickly turn those away who do not have adequate justification.
Right now, we are not there, and have not been for decades.We should simply establish the budget necessary to process applicants at a rate that matches our ability to assimilate or remove these individuals
'A wall' does not solve our problems, Cletus.Who voted against funding a wall while sending billions to Ukraine?
Right now, we are not there, and have not been for decades.
Which makes it perplexing as to why you are defending the House Republicans scuttling a bill that Senate Republicans and moderate Republicans are saying is "a good deal".
I don't want the bill as is because it is a bad bill. Has nothing to do with party or Trump. Why would you want a bill that still allows mass illegal crossings? If your leg was cut off would you just put a band aid on it?
Yes. The bill does exist.Not defending House Republicans. Bill does not exist.
Yes. The bill does exist.
The idiots you vote for and defend won't vote on it.
If you’re for a wall you’re just for a massive grift being put in place to line the pockets of the trump family forever. The coyotes will just cut through the wall and send immigrants through. They already do that where there is wall.Who voted against funding a wall while sending billions to Ukraine?
That is because - as a bill that allocates funds - it MUST originate in the House, idiot.No Senate passage yet...
That is because - as a bill that allocates funds - it MUST originate in the House, idiot.
You are rather uninformed on how our laws and Constitution work. Senate Republicans have informally "signed off" on what Biden negotiated.
Your buddies in the House will not bring it to a vote.
Actually the opposite and the reason we have the different branches of government. You are supposed to have discourse and disagreement.Definitely better to do nothing if the bill isn’t perfect.
perfect picture of the disfunction of our government.
Because that is not what Biden negotiated with them.HR2 originated in the House and Schumer will not bring it to a vote
Actually the opposite and the reason we have the different branches of government. You are supposed to have discourse and disagreement.
Because his party tells him to like it. He has no independent thought. And the fact he responded with a laughing emoji when you stated the legislation being debated allows for mass crossings to continue shows he is a lemming.I don't want the bill as is because it is a bad bill. Has nothing to do with party or Trump. Why would you want a bill that still allows mass illegal crossings? If your leg was cut off would you just put a band aid on it?
Not true. For the first time, the country wants this taken care of, a watered down bill, like this one appears to be based on what @The Devil has posted, does very little good, and absolutely does not secure the border.Definitely better to do nothing if the bill isn’t perfect.
perfect picture of the disfunction of our government.
Mexico! 🤣 🤣 🤣Who voted against funding a wall while sending billions to Ukraine?
You'd think that mods here would know how to find more credible sources...🙄
Leading Report - Bias and Credibility
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or nomediabiasfactcheck.com
Rated the most extreme level of bias and the lowest level of credibility.
Getting your news from the homeless guy under the bridge would literally be more reliable.
🤡
Are you really a moderator for Rivals?
Not true. For the first time, the country wants this taken care of, a watered down bill, like this one appears to be based on what @The Devil has posted, does very little good, and absolutely does not secure the border.
So again, secure border vs no secure border. Pass this legislation, a lot of patting themselves on the back and still no secure border.So again, do nothing. Republicans have said this is as good as it’s going to get. Better isn’t good enough, it has to be perfect. Life is tough with those standards, especially in politics.
So again, secure border vs no secure border. Pass this legislation, a lot of patting themselves on the back and still no secure border.
So again, secure border vs no secure border. Pass this legislation, a lot of patting themselves on the back and still no secure border.
No, Biden enforcing the laws on the books is a great start. Biden reversing his reversals of border policies is a great start.So doing nothing is preferable. Just say it, it’s freeing.
Which "reversals" are you referring to?No, Biden enforcing the laws on the books is a great start. Biden reversing his reversals of border policies is a great start.
ThisNot true. For the first time, the country wants this taken care of, a watered down bill, like this one appears to be based on what @The Devil has posted, does very little good, and absolutely does not secure the border.
Not true. The right wants this thing to be something they can point at during election season.This
No need to water down this thing. Almost everyone outside of far left Dems want this fixed and fixed correctly and forcibly. Public sentiment is at an all time high.