ADVERTISEMENT

Texas says NO to sharia law!

Typically that is what weak liberals do, walk away. The bottom line is you are all in denial when speaking of future plans of many Muslims coming to this country. They see how we don't handle illegal immigration already and it's an open invite. Look at the illegal alien problem we already have with Mexico - and I like the Mexicans and their culture, but it's still turning into a problem. Now imagine the same thing with millions that are hostile toward the US after Obama continues to bomb wedding parties and hospitals. I rest my case.

We gotta get this guy and OiT together in a room....
 
Typically that is what weak liberals do, walk away. The bottom line is you are all in denial when speaking of future plans of many Muslims coming to this country. They see how we don't handle illegal immigration already and it's an open invite. Look at the illegal alien problem we already have with Mexico - and I like the Mexicans and their culture, but it's still turning into a problem. Now imagine the same thing with millions that are hostile toward the US after Obama continues to bomb wedding parties and hospitals. I rest my case.

I'm surprised the Muslims you visited were so eager to lay out their plans for world domination to a complete stranger peppering them with questions.
 
So delusional that you are bringing sci-fi into this.

You probably don't read, but here is some light reading that will make you smarter. Deflect much?

Also known as an "Undocumented Alien," is an alien who has entered the United States illegally and is deportable if apprehended, or an alien who entered the United States legally but who has fallen "out of status" and is deportable.
 
You probably don't read, but here is some light reading that will make you smarter. Deflect much?

Also known as an "Undocumented Alien," is an alien who has entered the United States illegally and is deportable if apprehended, or an alien who entered the United States legally but who has fallen "out of status" and is deportable.

Nope I don't read none good none how.
 
It is sad and ridiculous that Muslims have replaced gays, Mexicans, and blacks as the newest scapegoat for the conservative-perceived "ruination of America."

Why? Which one of those groups would you like to re-ascend to that role?

This is a competitive hate environment....groups need to work to get and keep this role. Muslims took the initiative to get this role by various terrible acts. If the other groups want this role back, they need to take similar initiative.
 
Spell out the logistics of this. How do you think millions are going to get here?

Take a look at this article. There are plenty here already. Mix that way with breeding and refusal to assimilate and what do you have? That's right, France. Do you feel like living in that cesspool they created? I don't!


Muslim immigration, it’s very clear the level of immigration is rapidly increasing. According to numbers crunched by the Center for Immigration Studies based on data from the Census Bureau’s Factfinder database, the immigrant population from predominantly Muslim countries has grown from 1.7 million in 2000 to 2.7 million in 2013.

The sharpest increases from the Muslim world are from volatile countries such as Iraq, Iran, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. This tracks closely with Pew’s estimates of 100,000 new Muslim immigrants per year, almost twice the level of the previous decade. It is also 10% of our annual immigrant population. If this trajectory continues, we will eventually reach the level of saturation France is currently experiencing with Muslim immigrants – roughly 10% of their population.


http://cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-horowitz/us-muslim-immigrant-population-surges-1000000-2000
 
31a5657be31f50f391074c5247e8774e077345750f60c5ebbdcaf17a6c1b6297.jpg
35nftw.jpg
6c7559bd0a07bd509bc56403bf3acccb02be01d529cd8bbe13021bc1f896d307.jpg
 
Take a look at this article. There are plenty here already. Mix that way with breeding and refusal to assimilate and what do you have? That's right, France. Do you feel like living in that cesspool they created? I don't!


Muslim immigration, it’s very clear the level of immigration is rapidly increasing. According to numbers crunched by the Center for Immigration Studies based on data from the Census Bureau’s Factfinder database, the immigrant population from predominantly Muslim countries has grown from 1.7 million in 2000 to 2.7 million in 2013.

The sharpest increases from the Muslim world are from volatile countries such as Iraq, Iran, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. This tracks closely with Pew’s estimates of 100,000 new Muslim immigrants per year, almost twice the level of the previous decade. It is also 10% of our annual immigrant population. If this trajectory continues, we will eventually reach the level of saturation France is currently experiencing with Muslim immigrants – roughly 10% of their population.


http://cnsnews.com/commentary/daniel-horowitz/us-muslim-immigrant-population-surges-1000000-2000
Not in our life time. 10% would be ~30 million. At 100k per year you are looking at a 300 year plan to even matter. I can't be asked to care about your great great great great great great great grandkids.
 
Not in our life time. 10% would be ~30 million. At 100k per year you are looking at a 300 year plan to even matter. I can't be asked to care about your great great great great great great great grandkids.

We are reproducing slower and slower, while they rapidly have kids. Guess what? The HIGHEST fertility rates in the muslim world are found in countries with the highest level of terrorist activity and hatred toward the west. See below. Somalians at 5.2 to 1.8 of the Norwegians? Good gracious, that will not take 300 years to completely change their country. 30 or less would be much closer guess than 300 years.

"Fertility levels in the countries of origin for Muslim immigrants are reflected in different fertility rates among Muslim groups in Europe, as immigrants often arrive with the norms of their home countries. In Norway, the TFRs varied substantially depending on where women were born. Among immigrant women living in Norway, Somali women had a TFR of 5.2 in 1997-1998, compared with 4.8 for Iraqis, 3.1 for Turks, and 1.9 for Iranians. Native Norwegian women had 1.8 children on average during the period.

Women who report firm adherence to their religious beliefs and practices tend to have higher fertility than less religious women, whether Christian or Muslim. Other factors also contribute to the higher Muslim fertility, including younger marriage ages for Muslims and a tendency to have children soon after immigrating. The study confirms the perception that Muslim women have more children than non-Muslims in Western Europe."
 
So you're making stuff up with nothing to add? Great to know - we can all dismiss you when the adults talk next time.

LOLWUT!?

YOU'RE the one who has:

  • Posted a fake news story which was debunked well over a year ago, and to which the ACTUAL Dearborn MI city council had to post a response to on its own website due to all the Tea Party Conservatards being duped by it
  • Posted 'statistics' regarding French immigrants, which provide mathematical evidence completely at odds with your premise

I'm in eager anticipation of your next post to complete your "Trifecta Of Stupidity"
 
We are reproducing slower and slower, while they rapidly have kids. Guess what? The HIGHEST fertility rates in the muslim world are found in countries with the highest level of terrorist activity and hatred toward the west. See below. Somalians at 5.2 to 1.8 of the Norwegians? Good gracious, that will not take 300 years to completely change their country. 30 or less would be much closer guess than 300 years.

"Fertility levels in the countries of origin for Muslim immigrants are reflected in different fertility rates among Muslim groups in Europe, as immigrants often arrive with the norms of their home countries. In Norway, the TFRs varied substantially depending on where women were born. Among immigrant women living in Norway, Somali women had a TFR of 5.2 in 1997-1998, compared with 4.8 for Iraqis, 3.1 for Turks, and 1.9 for Iranians. Native Norwegian women had 1.8 children on average during the period.

Women who report firm adherence to their religious beliefs and practices tend to have higher fertility than less religious women, whether Christian or Muslim. Other factors also contribute to the higher Muslim fertility, including younger marriage ages for Muslims and a tendency to have children soon after immigrating. The study confirms the perception that Muslim women have more children than non-Muslims in Western Europe."

I posted earlier in another thread that someone had the dumbest post of the day. I was way too early on this, because you've blown it away like 10 times now. Congratulations sir, you may collect your foil hat at the door.
 
Sharia Law is not all bad. The usury laws would be great for home owners. It would be great to buy a 300k home and only pay the bank 30k in interest.

Fear mongering over less than 2% of the population is beyond nutty. Its the same people who believe Obama will go door to door to confiscate guns, the government is evading Texas and gay marriage will lead to Bubba marrying his dog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
LOLWUT!?

YOU'RE the one who has:

  • Posted a fake news story which was debunked well over a year ago, and to which the ACTUAL Dearborn MI city council had to post a response to on its own website due to all the Tea Party Conservatards being duped by it
  • Posted 'statistics' regarding French immigrants, which provide mathematical evidence completely at odds with your premise

I'm in eager anticipation of your next post to complete your "Trifecta Of Stupidity"

Look, you've made up your mind, but there is no reason for name calling or other childish tactics. First of all, if the article was satire, than there is still an element of truth. They are responding to something, it's not just made up out of thin air... Satire is when people make fun or others because they have no response or cannot think on their own. I could just sit here and make fun of you all day, but it would be a waste of time since this site is obviously dominated by blow hard liberals trying to advance their agenda.
 
Look, you've made up your mind, but there is no reason for name calling or other childish tactics. First of all, if the article was satire, than there is still an element of truth. They are responding to something, it's not just made up out of thin air... Satire is when people make fun or others because they have no response or cannot think on their own. I could just sit here and make fun of you all day, but it would be a waste of time since this site is obviously dominated by blow hard liberals trying to advance their agenda.

You're making it too easy, dude.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
Look, you've made up your mind, but there is no reason for name calling or other childish tactics. First of all, if the article was satire, than there is still an element of truth. They are responding to something, it's not just made up out of thin air... Satire is when people make fun or others because they have no response or cannot think on their own. I could just sit here and make fun of you all day, but it would be a waste of time since this site is obviously dominated by blow hard liberals trying to advance their agenda.

If the article was satire? Wtf are you talking about? Its 100% proven BS, but your mind still wont allow you to accept it?

Something tells me you're wishing it was true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
If the article was satire? Wtf are you talking about? Its 100% proven BS, but your mind still wont allow you to accept it?

Something tells me you're wishing it was true.

No, it was just somebody telling a lie, then saying - "See, I got you with a real topic on real issues that I just made up as fictious story and told it as truth". I don't wish it was true, I wish people didn't make up flat out lies (based on truth) and put it out there as fact. The article easily could be real in many cities, right here in America.

The writers here are guilty of fear mongering and trying to incite people by purposely lying. Not funny in my book and it doesn't make me stupid just because I read something at face value.
 
Look, you've made up your mind, but there is no reason for name calling or other childish tactics. First of all, if the article was satire, than there is still an element of truth. They are responding to something, it's not just made up out of thin air... Satire is when people make fun or others because they have no response or cannot think on their own. I could just sit here and make fun of you all day, but it would be a waste of time since this site is obviously dominated by blow hard liberals trying to advance their agenda.
I don't mean professional comedians, they are actually good at it. People lying with a political agenda and calling it humor are not that impressive to me.

Your view of the world fascinates me.
 
No, it was just somebody telling a lie, then saying - "See, I got you with a real topic on real issues that I just made up as fictious story and told it as truth". I don't wish it was true, I wish people didn't make up flat out lies (based on truth) and put it out there as fact. The article easily could be real in many cities, right here in America.

The writers here are guilty of fear mongering and trying to incite people by purposely lying. Not funny in my book and it doesn't make me stupid just because I read something at face value.

Please name some cities where the article would apply?

The boogieman is coming to get you, be scared and prepared.
 
No, it was just somebody telling a lie, then saying - "See, I got you with a real topic on real issues that I just made up as fictious story and told it as truth". I don't wish it was true, I wish people didn't make up flat out lies (based on truth) and put it out there as fact. The article easily could be real in many cities, right here in America.

The writers here are guilty of fear mongering and trying to incite people by purposely lying. Not funny in my book and it doesn't make me stupid just because I read something at face value.

I'd throw a "not sure if serious" meme in here, but clearly sarcasm eludes you. The right's ability to believe anything as long as it's what they want to hear just amazes me.
 
We are reproducing slower and slower, while they rapidly have kids. Guess what? The HIGHEST fertility rates in the muslim world are found in countries with the highest level of terrorist activity and hatred toward the west. See below. Somalians at 5.2 to 1.8 of the Norwegians? Good gracious, that will not take 300 years to completely change their country. 30 or less would be much closer guess than 300 years.

"Fertility levels in the countries of origin for Muslim immigrants are reflected in different fertility rates among Muslim groups in Europe, as immigrants often arrive with the norms of their home countries. In Norway, the TFRs varied substantially depending on where women were born. Among immigrant women living in Norway, Somali women had a TFR of 5.2 in 1997-1998, compared with 4.8 for Iraqis, 3.1 for Turks, and 1.9 for Iranians. Native Norwegian women had 1.8 children on average during the period.

Women who report firm adherence to their religious beliefs and practices tend to have higher fertility than less religious women, whether Christian or Muslim. Other factors also contribute to the higher Muslim fertility, including younger marriage ages for Muslims and a tendency to have children soon after immigrating. The study confirms the perception that Muslim women have more children than non-Muslims in Western Europe."
Dude, we were talking about people coming here which your own data puts at 100k per year. Frankly Somolia could do with a change, I hope they get one.
 
I must be missing something. Are there people in this thread defending Sharia Law?
Just the usury laws so far. Although to be fair Christianity and Judaism have some pretty fine policies along those lines too. Abraham must not have been a banker.
 
I don't mind usury, what bothers me is fractional reserve banking.


Edit: I really only asked because Sharia Law has some pretty ****ed up laws.

Not defending Sharia law, but usually the ones that are most vocal about making sure we don't live under islamic law would love to legislate that people live under laws based on their religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: naturalmwa
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT