ADVERTISEMENT

Texas to remove one of its last gun restrictions after lawmakers approved allowing people to carry handguns without license & checks that go with it

Morrison71

HB Legend
Nov 10, 2006
16,508
15,580
113
AUSTIN, TEXAS -- Texas is poised to remove one of its last gun restrictions after lawmakers approved allowing people to carry handguns without a license, and the background check and training that go with it.

The Republican-dominated Legislature approved the measure Monday, sending it to Gov. Greg Abbott, who has said he will sign it despite the objections of law enforcement groups who say it would endanger the public and police.

Gun control groups also oppose the measure, noting the state's recent history of mass shootings, including those at an El Paso Walmart, a church in Sutherland Springs, and a high school outside Houston, though each of those attacks, the assailants primarily used assault-style rifles, not handguns.

Texas already has some of the loosest gun laws in the country and has more than 1.6 million handgun license holders.

Supporters of the bill say it would allow Texans to better defend themselves in public while abolishing unnecessary impediments to the constitutional right to bear arms. Once signed into law, Texas will join nearly two dozen other states that allow some form of unregulated carry of a handgun, and by far the most populous.

Texas already allows rifles to be carried in public without a license. The measure sent to Abbott would allow anyone age 21 or older to carry a handgun as long as they don't have violent crime convictions or some other legal prohibition in their background. But there would be no way to weed them out without the state background check currently in the licensing process.
 
AUSTIN, TEXAS -- Texas is poised to remove one of its last gun restrictions after lawmakers approved allowing people to carry handguns without a license, and the background check and training that go with it.

The Republican-dominated Legislature approved the measure Monday, sending it to Gov. Greg Abbott, who has said he will sign it despite the objections of law enforcement groups who say it would endanger the public and police.

Gun control groups also oppose the measure, noting the state's recent history of mass shootings, including those at an El Paso Walmart, a church in Sutherland Springs, and a high school outside Houston, though each of those attacks, the assailants primarily used assault-style rifles, not handguns.

Texas already has some of the loosest gun laws in the country and has more than 1.6 million handgun license holders.

Supporters of the bill say it would allow Texans to better defend themselves in public while abolishing unnecessary impediments to the constitutional right to bear arms. Once signed into law, Texas will join nearly two dozen other states that allow some form of unregulated carry of a handgun, and by far the most populous.

Texas already allows rifles to be carried in public without a license. The measure sent to Abbott would allow anyone age 21 or older to carry a handgun as long as they don't have violent crime convictions or some other legal prohibition in their background. But there would be no way to weed them out without the state background check currently in the licensing process.
**** the GOP **** them. ****ing terrorists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huey Grey
Astoundingly stupid. How could anyone in good faith make the argument that allowing people to carry a gun with no license, no training, and no background check makes us safer?
They want chaos. So when they refuse to certify the election we descend into mayhem.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TheCainer
What makes it hard to vote?
Sounds like you don’t need ID to carry a gun, and you can do it anytime and anywhere. Voting is being restricted to fewer and fewer days, fewer locations, tighter ID, oversight by partisan observers, you can’t have a sip of water from a friendly citizen while waiting to vote (Anyone can you give you a water while strutting into Applebee’s with a 9 strapped to your thigh), super boards can take control from elected officials (Nobody gets your gun for any reason)...
 
Sounds like you don’t need ID to carry a gun, and you can do it anytime and anywhere. Voting is being restricted to fewer and fewer days, fewer locations, tighter ID, oversight by partisan observers, you can’t have a sip of water from a friendly citizen while waiting to vote (Anyone can you give you a water while strutting into Applebee’s with a 9 strapped to your thigh), super boards can take control from elected officials (Nobody gets your gun for any reason)...

Sounds like the way it was when the constitution was written.
 
Sounds like the way it was when the constitution was written.
90 percent of the population was illiterate when that was written, and you had to shoot things to eat. And, you clearly have no idea what the founders meant by having a regulated militia. It meant calling able bodied men together for the purpose of defense. Not for any a-hole to shoot up a Wal-Mart or music festival in Las Vegas.
 
Sounds like the way it was when the constitution was written.


This sort of research may have been the state of the art in 2008. However, modern technology allows us to dive deeper. Professor Dennis Baron, who joined the Linguistics brief in Heller a decade ago, searched the COFEA for the term “bear arms.” He also performed the same search on the Corpus of Early Modern English, which includes nearly 1.3 billion words from over 40,000 texts from 1475-1800. He foundabout 1,500 separate occurrences of ‘bear arms’ in the 17th and 18th centuries, and only a handful don’t refer to war, soldiering or organized, armed action.” From this evidence, Professor Baron concluded that the “[t]hese databases confirm that the natural meaning of ‘bear arms’ in the framers’ day was military.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huey Grey
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT