Thank you on Syracuse

[FairfIowafan1984]

Was saying all week that these "experts" who had Syracuse in was just dumb. Terrible everything, they had some good wins at home but that was it. Forget which "expert" promised Syracuse would be in but I'm sure he's complaining about it now.

They didn't win on the road, had a high RPI and were 18-14, Iowa had a better resume. Also they play in one of the biggest and hardest places to come out with a victory in. Also a Nebraska player from last year was their best player.

 

[Herkmeister]

 

[Auger]

ESPN is getting hard to watch. Really starting to force myself over to Fox Sports and break over 20 years of habit. The fact ESPN talked the most about Syracuse a team that missed out than any other team just shows how bias and narcissistic they have become. Its no secret the love fest ESPN and many of their so called experts have with Syracuse and their coach who I shall not name.

 

[FairfIowafan1984]

ESPN is getting hard to watch. Really starting to force myself over to Fox Sports and break over 20 years of habit. The fact ESPN talked the most about Syracuse a team that missed out than any other team just shows how bias and narcissistic they have become. Its no secret the love fest ESPN and many of their so called experts have with Syracuse and their coach who I shall not name.

Last year all the non ESPN people were so mad they got in and they had a better record, RPI, resume. This year heard acouple people on ESPN are so mad and don't understand why they didn't get in and keep showing that stupid BPI which is a ESPN made up metrics system. They had a 84 RPI!!! And worst losses than Iowa's Worst RPI losses.

I think they don't believe they should have been in but are just saying it to take up air time many of these talking heads do it.

 

[0418hawkguy1001]

Didn't Lunardi get like 30 minutes to complain about Syracuse not getting in and didn't even touch on Iowa, who had better wins and losses and was similar vs top 50 and top 100 as Syracuse didn't even get a lick of time?