ADVERTISEMENT

The Beat Goes On…

RagnarLothbrok

HB Heisman
Apr 4, 2023
9,753
27,436
113
This is what you get with Fran ball.

You have to accept the good with the downright dreadful. It’s incredibly bipolar basketball, yet easily predicted.

I don’t care who’s in the lineup or whatever player rotations get discussed. Player additions/subtractions will also yield the same results—many thrilling wins, head-scratching defeats, and early to mid-March season endings. Rinse and repeat.

As long as Fran is here, you can either accept that, drive yourself crazy, or become indifferent, because with shit defense you’re never going to see anything remotely consistent besides that.
 
This is what you get with Fran ball.

You have to accept the good with the downright dreadful. It’s incredibly bipolar basketball, yet easily predicted.

I don’t care who’s in the lineup or whatever player rotations get discussed. Player additions/subtractions will also yield the same results—many thrilling wins, head-scratching defeats, and early to mid-March season endings. Rinse and repeat.

As long as Fran is here, you can either accept that, drive yourself crazy, or become indifferent, because with shit defense you’re never going to see anything remotely consistent besides that.
This is a pretty good summary of how I've been feeling about Iowa men's basketball. Sometimes good, sometimes not. I don't hate it, but I've seen this show before, and I know how it ends. Not much incentive to watch.
 
This is what you get with Fran ball.

You have to accept the good with the downright dreadful. It’s incredibly bipolar basketball, yet easily predicted.

I don’t care who’s in the lineup or whatever player rotations get discussed. Player additions/subtractions will also yield the same results—many thrilling wins, head-scratching defeats, and early to mid-March season endings. Rinse and repeat.

As long as Fran is here, you can either accept that, drive yourself crazy, or become indifferent, because with shit defense you’re never going to see anything remotely consistent besides that.
Especially on the road we are dreadful
 
we are in the midst of a normal Fran season, with 14 games left it safe to assume we'll win 17-19 games

first 7 years = 19.6 win average
last 7 years = 20.4 win average
last 2 years = 19.0 win average

2010-11IowaBig Ten
31​
11​
20​
0.355​
2011-12IowaBig Ten
35​
18​
17​
0.514​
2012-13IowaBig Ten
38​
25​
13​
0.658​
2013-14IowaBig Ten
33​
20​
13​
0.606​
2014-15IowaBig Ten
34​
22​
12​
0.647​
2015-16IowaBig Ten
33​
22​
11​
0.667​
2016-17IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2017-18IowaBig Ten
33​
14​
19​
0.424​
2018-19IowaBig Ten
35​
23​
12​
0.657​
2019-20IowaBig Ten
31​
20​
11​
0.645​
2020-21IowaBig Ten
31​
22​
9​
0.71​
2021-22IowaBig Ten
36​
26​
10​
0.722​
2022-23IowaBig Ten
33​
19​
14​
0.576​
2023-24IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2024-25IowaBig Ten
17​
12​
5​
0.706​
 
we are in the midst of a normal Fran season, with 14 games left it safe to assume we'll win 17-19 games

first 7 years = 19.6 win average
last 7 years = 20.4 win average
last 2 years = 19.0 win average

2010-11IowaBig Ten
31​
11​
20​
0.355​
2011-12IowaBig Ten
35​
18​
17​
0.514​
2012-13IowaBig Ten
38​
25​
13​
0.658​
2013-14IowaBig Ten
33​
20​
13​
0.606​
2014-15IowaBig Ten
34​
22​
12​
0.647​
2015-16IowaBig Ten
33​
22​
11​
0.667​
2016-17IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2017-18IowaBig Ten
33​
14​
19​
0.424​
2018-19IowaBig Ten
35​
23​
12​
0.657​
2019-20IowaBig Ten
31​
20​
11​
0.645​
2020-21IowaBig Ten
31​
22​
9​
0.71​
2021-22IowaBig Ten
36​
26​
10​
0.722​
2022-23IowaBig Ten
33​
19​
14​
0.576​
2023-24IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2024-25IowaBig Ten
17​
12​
5​
0.706​
Wow. Only one season with less than 10 losses.
 
They choose to be bipolar on defense, as you say. The one thing that a basketball team can do on a consistent basis is to play solid defense every game. They choose not to do so. Instead, they seem to rely on their offense, which is inherently inconsistent for all basketball teams. So, combining these two inconsistent elements will consistently lead to these results.

I am interested enough to read about the team, post my thoughts about the team on this board and (mostly) watch the games. But on a scale, I am much closer to indifferent than I ever have been. I am hardly alone in this, and the declining attendance at the games bears this out.
 
Aside from the rare outlier, here and there - winning in East Lansing by 20+ one season, going into Bloomington and winning big another - Iowa has always massively underperformed on the road with Fran as the coach.

This is what makes things so frustrating with Fran McCaffery teams. Last night's game was a game they NEEDED to win, even on the road. But instead, they laid a giant egg until the deficit was too big to overcome. Which we see all the damned time in those types of situations.
 
we are in the midst of a normal Fran season, with 14 games left it safe to assume we'll win 17-19 games

first 7 years = 19.6 win average
last 7 years = 20.4 win average
last 2 years = 19.0 win average

2010-11IowaBig Ten
31​
11​
20​
0.355​
2011-12IowaBig Ten
35​
18​
17​
0.514​
2012-13IowaBig Ten
38​
25​
13​
0.658​
2013-14IowaBig Ten
33​
20​
13​
0.606​
2014-15IowaBig Ten
34​
22​
12​
0.647​
2015-16IowaBig Ten
33​
22​
11​
0.667​
2016-17IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2017-18IowaBig Ten
33​
14​
19​
0.424​
2018-19IowaBig Ten
35​
23​
12​
0.657​
2019-20IowaBig Ten
31​
20​
11​
0.645​
2020-21IowaBig Ten
31​
22​
9​
0.71​
2021-22IowaBig Ten
36​
26​
10​
0.722​
2022-23IowaBig Ten
33​
19​
14​
0.576​
2023-24IowaBig Ten
34​
19​
15​
0.559​
2024-25IowaBig Ten
17​
12​
5​
0.706​
And his Big Ten record is now 139-131.
 
  • Like
Reactions: amahawk
This is what you get with Fran ball.

You have to accept the good with the downright dreadful. It’s incredibly bipolar basketball, yet easily predicted.

I don’t care who’s in the lineup or whatever player rotations get discussed. Player additions/subtractions will also yield the same results—many thrilling wins, head-scratching defeats, and early to mid-March season endings. Rinse and repeat.

As long as Fran is here, you can either accept that, drive yourself crazy, or become indifferent, because with shit defense you’re never going to see anything remotely consistent besides that.
Yep, it's just a shooting contest most nights besides the odd opponent that is poorly coached on how to deal with zone like IU.

Frans equation is that his shooters are better so he wants to have as many possessions as possible and he thinks he'll score the most points more often than not in a shoot out.

It works kind of.
 
And his Big Ten record is now 139-131.
Does that include BTT? I think he's around 3 games under 0.500 in BTT play and around 6-12 in NCAA play. He's about as close to a Coin Flip coach and you will get vs Big10 opponents. The Fran Fade for February is not really a thing, but March's haven't been kind outside the lone BTT title.

He's not terrible and he won't be fired, but it looks like his contract extension is not in the Bank yet.
 
Does that include BTT? I think he's around 3 games under 0.500 in BTT play and around 6-12 in NCAA play. He's about as close to a Coin Flip coach and you will get vs Big10 opponents. The Fran Fade for February is not really a thing, but March's haven't been kind outside the lone BTT title.

He's not terrible and he won't be fired, but it looks like his contract extension is not in the Bank yet.
Conference play only, does not include the BTT. Each can draw his or her own conclusions. I will add my two cents, his deserved credit for bringing Iowa back from the Lickliter Cliffs is not that relevant today, but it keeps him from being fired.
 
This is what you get with Fran ball.

You have to accept the good with the downright dreadful. It’s incredibly bipolar basketball, yet easily predicted.

I don’t care who’s in the lineup or whatever player rotations get discussed. Player additions/subtractions will also yield the same results—many thrilling wins, head-scratching defeats, and early to mid-March season endings. Rinse and repeat.

As long as Fran is here, you can either accept that, drive yourself crazy, or become indifferent, because with shit defense you’re never going to see anything remotely consistent besides that.
Was there a head-scratching loss that prompted this post?
 
I don't view the Fran era so much as bipolar.. That was the Alford era. Where they could beat a ranked team, then turn around and lose to a cellar dweller.

Fran seems to pretty much always beat the teams he's supposed to, and does pretty well in home games against similar competition. Outside of that? Not so hot. In March, it's been ugly.
 
Yep, it's just a shooting contest most nights besides the odd opponent that is poorly coached on how to deal with zone like IU.

Frans equation is that his shooters are better so he wants to have as many possessions as possible and he thinks he'll score the most points more often than not in a shoot out.

It works kind of.
Bingo. Fran being labled as some kind of “offensive guru” is ridiculous. His teams score points because they don’t play much defense and they play at a fast pace driving up the amount of possessions. Watch the half court offense, it’s freakin streetball most of the time
 
Was there a head-scratching loss that prompted this post?
Oh No Facepalm GIF by Aminé
 
Bingo. Fran being labled as some kind of “offensive guru” is ridiculous. His teams score points because they don’t play much defense and they play at a fast pace driving up the amount of possessions. Watch the half court offense, it’s freakin streetball most of the time
I do agree. Any credit that really should be given is to leaps in development some players have made to him. But so much of what looks good statistically is inflated during blow out wins vs lesser talent.

With the right roster he’s put together decent presses and use to be fairly good at designing and call plays for inbounding. But I don’t think he does anything special for half court offense that can be adjusted from game to game. Pretty run of the mill motion offense and hasn’t really risked making changes in last decade.
 
It's been more of the same with Fran for years.
Like many others I've lost interest knowing that they'll go nowhere when it really matters in March.
I still love college ball and look forward to the NCAA tourney. I spend more time paying attention to what other teams who are potential tourney contenders are doing. There's no shortage of ball to watch.
 
It was a simple question.

I get as frustrated as the next guy about Iowa basketball. Probably more, which is why I'm rarely posting on the basketball board. Nobody needs to hear my complaints.

Just not sure where OP is coming from. Is it the USC loss you find head scratching? That would be head scratching to me because USC was favored to win the game. Iowa basketball, at some point must have earned a high opinion in your mind, for you to see USC as a head scratching loss. Something doesn't add up.

On a side, you could see the look in USC's eyes before the game that it was a very important game to them, given the recent tragedies in LA
 
Bingo. Fran being labled as some kind of “offensive guru” is ridiculous. His teams score points because they don’t play much defense and they play at a fast pace driving up the amount of possessions. Watch the half court offense, it’s freakin streetball most of the time

That’s…that’s not how offensive efficiency is measured. Virginia was #1 one year in efficiency. That certainly didn’t have anything to do with pace or lack of D. Now if you’re talking about ppg…well you’re talking a language smart people really don’t use in 2025.
 
Watching Iowa State play defense, rebound and score tonight is making me ill. They play a totally different sport than Fran ball.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT