Sure, but every group refers to “elites” and they imply different things. I listen to pods across the political spectrum and so many of them refer to the “elites” with no further description of who they’re talking about. I get the concept, it’s just that the term is used as a lazy crutch to mean “whatever rich people I want you to think are actively trying to screw you over”.
Are you serious? You are making a comparison with Dems and Trump and you think the Dems are the elitists and not the guy who literally sits on a golden toliet? Hmm. Odd take. Sounds like some BS Trump tells his worshippers.
This is not true.
Elites is also a definition simply referring to the top 1%ish of people. Some of these people like Bill Gates fit into the financial elite and also into the global influence elite who are part of the WEF.
He actively opposes everything the World Economic Forum stands for and is the current leader of the Republican Party in the USA. He is one of the very few people who could come in the way to the elites pulling their plan off.
Is there anything that I have said that you agree is true? What have I said that you disagree with the most?
The elites love Biden and for good reason. He's made them a lot of money over the course of the last few years. Another group that has an unnaturally high approval rating of Biden? All the illegals (1/4 million every month) crossing the border. What do they both have in common? Neither group puts America first.
We'll see who the loser is in November, if there is an election.
They are worried because they know people are becoming more aware of what they are doing. Did you see Kevin Roberts at the WEF this year?
This, he's basically given the WEF the middle finger, de-funded the WHO, and opted out of the Paris Accord. Multiple bold as hell middle fingers to the elites who put America last.
Haha that's awesome! Keep up with your logical fallacy ad hominem debate style. It's very telling!
Lets pretend it was true that Biden was intentionally allowing in illegals because that is part of the WEF/elites global agenda? Would that be concerning to you? This is a concept that has been discussed and is written in their agendas.
Lets say it was true that Biden was intentionally allowing in illegals because that is part of the WEF/elites global agenda? Would that be concerning?
The fall and rise of global borders
"The world is becoming more global. More than ever people are proactively deciding where to live, where to study, where to work. Sometimes it’s out of necessity, sometimes it’s out of choice. But the opening up of the world thanks to technology and other factors like simpler regulation means we don’t need to stay within the borders of the country in which we were born. It’s even possible to be an e-Resident of a country.
Being a ‘global citizen’ is no longer reserved for the global elite. Thanks to the democratising power of technology, it’s not a trend determined by privilege or even age but by attitude. Technology gives us a level of global interconnectedness that we’ve never before experienced. If we couple that physical/virtual interconnectedness with an attitude of openness, then the world becomes both limitless and a lot smaller.
However, this macro-trend seems to be experiencing a few setbacks at the moment. There is increased rhetoric in parts of the world about the need for borders and walls. The voices in favour of borders that are heard at the moment come from a position of fear, perhaps of change or the unknown. In some cases these voices highlight some of the challenges in a society that’s changing at speed; those voices need to be heard, and solutions found.
Globalisation is increasing - but are countries retreating behind their borders, too? Image: KOF Swiss Economic Institute
In other cases, these voices come from a fear that the balance of power will change. Well, maybe it needs to. Because once you start building borders, the world retreats into different cells closed off from each other and competing out of insecurity and limitation. It closes down potential and opportunity.
Look at the financial sector. In theory, it should operate well on a global level - it is after all a global system, for example because of its role in facilitating international trade. And there is no reason for money not to move as easily as sending an email.
In reality, it’s quite the opposite. The financial system functions very much within national borders. Some of those constraints started for the right reasons, such as to avoid criminal use of the system; many did not. More often than not the constraints are there out of self-interest or laziness and now function as a way to protect the status quo.
Loading…
www.weforum.org
Is Freedom of movement a human right?
"We tend to think of the right to free movement within a state as an essential freedom. If the government banned you from visiting and settling in certain parts of the country you would rightly feel outraged. The government would be denying you the choice of where to live and study, who you can form relationships with, who you can associate with on a religious or political basis, and it would be denying you a range of important economic opportunities. These are fundamental choices that affect how our lives are lived.
But notice that these very same considerations also apply to freedom of movement across borders. In today’s globalised world, restricting your right to move across borders is not so very different from confining you to the boundaries of Yorkshire, say, or Seattle."
Loading…
www.weforum.org
Cross my heart, swear to die. I am not trolling you.
1% athletically
You left the Koch brothers and Rupert Murdoch off your list, who have spent more to influence public opinion and policy in this country than anyone else over the past 30 years. 2/10
He lives on credit. Even admitted in depositions. Trump loves him some bribes and donor money for others to pay for his lifestyle.
I listed 5 people who everyone would know. I assumed people would realize it was not meant to be an all inclusive list.
If he has money. How come Trump leaves unpaid bills everywhere. Or no decent lawyers will represent him. Mainly because they want to be paid.
It's okay. Coincidences happen. Probably just another coincidence that you're spewing the very type of crap that they propagate. I'm sure that the nonelites will be better off if the elites are allowed to externalize even more of their costs and hoard even more wealth. It makes sense if you don't think about it.
