It’s largely about home field advantage. Generally, “alpha” guys maintain power by tailoring their behaviors to fit a specific set of circumstances, sensibilities and dynamics. It’s the alpha who requires a “fair fight” in order to ensure continued success. That why when Bobby Hill started slaying his enemies by kicking them in the balls (“that’s MY purse!”) it caused such a stir. His asymmetrical tactics—borrowed from urban self defense culture—posed an existential threat to the small town power structure.
I think the “alphas” at question itt are aware of their tactical disadvantage where operating outside their ideal cultural biome, and they overcompensate with firearms and a generally aggressive attitude—which is their perception of the proper posture to assume in an urban setting.
Also, I get what convenient parking is saying, but I think there is legitimate value to interacting with nature via hunting/fishing/foraging. I see it as a coping strategy to deal with what Marxists have identified as the problem of alienation from production.
I think the “alphas” at question itt are aware of their tactical disadvantage where operating outside their ideal cultural biome, and they overcompensate with firearms and a generally aggressive attitude—which is their perception of the proper posture to assume in an urban setting.
Also, I get what convenient parking is saying, but I think there is legitimate value to interacting with nature via hunting/fishing/foraging. I see it as a coping strategy to deal with what Marxists have identified as the problem of alienation from production.
