The insane vaccine debate
- Thread starter *33*
- Start date
Improve harder.
Welcome
openvaers.com
Vaers AGAIN?
How many times do you have to have that database explained to you?
Give us a number, and then we'll know.
A
anon_b29nm7v7dwp6r
Guest
We should give the anti-Vaxxers an island “anti vaccine and mask freedomland” as an experiment and see how it goes!
No, it's pretty well documented to be safer.
And there are ample cases of those re-infected who have far worse outcomes the 2nd time around.
ONCE AGAIN:
CDC DOES NOT HOLD ANY INDIVIDUAL PATIENT RECORDS, AND SO YOUR "FOIA SEARCH" IS PRODUCING PRECISELY THE DISINFORMATION YOU ARE INTENDING HERE.
And yet we were expected to believe THIS from the cdc? Bullshit keeps getting deeper n deeper around here.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today confirmed that the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) has spread between two people in the United States, representing the first instance of person-to-person spread with this new virus here.
Previously, all confirmed U.S. cases had been associated with travel to Wuhan, China, where an outbreak of respiratory illness caused by this novel coronavirus has been ongoing since December 2019. However, this latest 2019-nCoV patient has no history of travel to Wuhan, but shared a household with the patient diagnosed with 2019-nCoV infection on January 21, 2020.
Recognizing early on that the 2019-nCoV could potentially spread between people, CDC has been working closely with state and local partners to identify close contacts of confirmed 2019-nCoV cases. Public health officials identified this Illinois resident through contact tracing. Both patients are in stable condition.
Can’t imagine not trusting some of these companies 
AGAIN:
CDC HAS NO INDIVIDUAL PATIENT RECORDS, AND AS SUCH WOULD NOT FORMALLY OWN ANY DOCUMENTATION RELATING TO WHAT WAS ASKED FOR.
You’re conflating documentation of an occurrence with private/personal medical records, which is not what the FOI request was about.
The CDC is aware of hundreds of thousands of breakthrough cases, and their Kentucky ‘study’ indicated that reinfection among the unvaxxed is 2:1 over the vaxxed.
So there’s likely, what, a million cases of the unvaxxed getting reinfected and the CDC can’t identify a SINGLE case of person-to-person spread? Yet last January they were not only able to identify the first case in the country but to inform us both persons were resting comfortably in the hospital??
Amazing sleuthing skills and contact tracing game they had then. Poor CDC boys must be getting worn out.
Biggest wealth transfer and con job in history...
It absolutely IS what the FOI request was about, because it requires CDC having that documentation, which THEY DO NOT HAVE NOR MAINTAIN.
You simply do not understand what information CDC maintains.
There are PLENTY of examples of unvaxxed being re-infected. CDC CITES those cases, but does not HOLD that data in-house on specific cases.
This is the INTENTED PROPAGANDA of your FOIA source. The KNOW THIS, and are exploiting it. You are either a willing or uninformed pawn in passing this around.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Similar threads
