Yep
Pour it on.
Take out his ships blocking/threatening Ukrainian exports w/ NATO assets.
He will piss himself.
Yeah, but he understands how to look like a strongman. This compromise makes him look weak. It also screws with the balance of power in the military.Who knows at this point. Putin has proven to NOT be the calculating evil genius he was touted to be.
Putin and co have done a lot of dumb shit…
Yep
Pour it on.
Take out his ships blocking/threatening Ukrainian exports w/ NATO assets.
He will piss himself.
If Putin fires nukes at anyone, Russia is done.I don’t know about this.
Just because Putin didn’t fire nuclear missiles at Russians in Russia doesn’t mean he won’t fire nuclear missiles at non-Russians in Not Russia.
I’m not sure why we, and the rest of the west, aren’t currently deporting more/all Russians anyway. The west is where they want to be. On the flip side, no one in their right mind wants to go to Russia and if they do, they’re arrested on trumped up charges simply to use as trade for real criminalsIf Putin fires nukes at anyone, Russia is done.
Russians will be deported, worldwide. Russia will no longer exist to the Western world.
That is not what he or his oligarchs want. They will lose EVERYTHING.
If Putin fires nukes at anyone, Russia is done.
Russians will be deported, worldwide. Russia will no longer exist to the Western world.
That is not what he or his oligarchs want. They will lose EVERYTHING.
100 percent this. I think it’s time to make it clear anymore attacks coming from Belarus will be dealt with by NATO air. Make it clear Belarus will be toast if Wagner or air strikes originate there.
Yep
Pour it on.
Take out his ships blocking/threatening Ukrainian exports w/ NATO assets.
He will piss himself.
Great news. The tank “range” is decidedly shorter than artie. Less “steel rain“ to worry about. Now, about those flying tanks… Prigo’s crew splashed a bunch of choppers, including 3 EW versions.
We also can’t let Putin act with impunity if he has nukes. If he uses one, NATO will be obligated to take him out. It’s a lose/lose scenario for him.We can’t assume Putin will act with restraint if he thinks he is in immediate danger.
If Putin uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine…NATO is obligated to take him out?We also can’t let Putin act with impunity if he has nukes. If he uses one, NATO will be obligated to take him out. It’s a lose/lose scenario for him.
IMHO-If Putin uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine…NATO is obligated to take him out?
I don’t think that’s in the treaty 😄
Lots of able bodied men in those videos, unlike the hinterland areas whose men were swept up into service.
Let’s just hope we never get to that point.IMHO-
Obligated may have been an incorrect word choice and taking out Putin the person is probably not needed, but he is not wrong in that we have to get the military involved in a big way.. If whoever the person in charge of Russia decides to use a nuke that doesn't mean Russia stops advancing. After the nuke Russia will walk all over Ukraine and control the country. At a minimum Poland now has to get involved and everything goes to shit very fast. Secondly, Ukraine while not a member of NATO is NATO's responsibility because of its action to date. I do not think we a have a real choice because Russia will probably never be weakened to this point ever again. We do nothing and the Bear will reconstitute itself.
I hope it doesn't come to this but it might have to be done.
They didn't need to stage a coup, and embarrass Putin in order to accomplish this.I personally think this is a means to relocate Russian forces to Belarus to create a new front line.
Yep. It weakened Putin immensely so not a plan.They didn't need to stage a coup, and embarrass Putin in order to accomplish this.
Crossing from Belarus into Ukraine would be a suicide mission. The Ukrainians have had a whole year to prep that border.I personally think this is a means to relocate Russian forces to Belarus to create a new front line.
Manpower shortages have been a component of the Russian failures. They'd weaken themselves by attempting another axis of attack.I personally think this is a means to relocate Russian forces to Belarus to create a new front line.
I was going to post this. Applebaum was on Lib TV this morning and said the same thing on air that she wrote.
This has been a tremendous propaganda victory for Ukraine. Expect to see the feeds to Russian soldiers filled with footage of the chaos, and of a Russian speaking Zelensky asking them why they are willing to die in a trench in Ukraine while the bosses live in luxury, and don't care about them?Good morning Russian citizens. A message-
Maybe we will find out after the war, but given our previous discussions on all of that old armor being pulled out of storage, I just have to think T-55s dug into a trench line, with no plan/ability to move them are being counted as artillery.
What happens if the radioactive dust settles on Poland, Romania, the Baltics...If Putin uses a tactical nuke in Ukraine…NATO is obligated to take him out?
I don’t think that’s in the treaty 😄