ADVERTISEMENT

This might be a little tougher than Putin thought...

That still doesn’t explain the thousands fleeing basically stating that a free independent Ukraine isn’t worth their life.
Yes the ones that have fought have been heroic and admirable, that’s not who we are talking about but the thousands buying medical exemptions (corruption) or fleeing over the border.
If you were one of the ones who stayed and fought how would you feel about the ones that did not?
You must not have been around during the Nam years. Comical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
You need a class on rhetoric and critical thinking. The war is 100 percent on Putin.

That said the war is about a country that didn't develop a broad based economy. One third of the Russian economy is gas and oil. The Bidens wanted to gain from developing the Donbas. It is akin to going for Putins jugular. Putin is ruthless.

Ukraine is equally as corrupt as Russia. The Govt is terrible. The Ukrainians needed to put and end to it.

The war is hell. Ukrainians have taken the brunt. Azov fired on civilians trying to leave Mariupol. The Ukrainian army was using the mall as a weapons depot in part of it.
Awful situation.
Wow. You seem to have inside info. Born and raised in Ukraine?
 


GBn0YyHWsAUWmZX
 
"The occupier decided to play hide-and-seek with a kamikaze drone, controlled by the pilots of the 59th brigade.PEGAS was honest, he didn't spy, he let the orc hide, and when he found it, he killed it. "

 

How Russo-Ukrainian War Could Undermine Moscow’s Missile Exports​


The Russo-Ukrainian War has shattered the perception that Vladimir Putin is the leader of a military superpower. In nearly two years of fighting, Russia has been unable to defeat Ukraine despite across-the-board military advantages. Russia outnumbers Ukraine in every category from manpower to armored vehicles to combat aircraft. Yet, the cries of “On to Kyiv” fell flat.

Where Moscow is lacking is in leadership. Putin has managed to saddle the Russian military with leadership so incompetent they rival Publius Quinctilius Varus, the Roman commander who marched three legions into an ambush that everyone saw coming but him. At least Varus paid for his folly with his life.

Concerning arms exports, Moscow is in second place, behind the United States. The distance between these rivals had been increasing before the war. Now, the war threatens to further undermine Russia’s position within the international arms market.

One possible area that Russia could see decline concerns air-launched weaponry. The war found the Ukrainian Air Force (UAF) unable to challenge its Russian counterpart due to its small size and use of obsolete equipment. Still, the UAF has survived and continues (surprisingly) to perform missions against Russian targets.

A unique development of this war is the integration of Western-made weaponry into Ukraine’s Russian-designed combat aircraft. Before the war, companies did not see the integration of Western missiles with Russian aircraft as worth the effort. The process is complicated and expensive and the market benefits are limited. The war could change this equation with the U.S. and Ukrainian governments footing the bill for this integration work.

The AGM-88 HARM was the first Western missile integrated with a Ukrainian fighter aircraft. Although Ukrainian pilots cannot use the HARM to its fullest capability, it enables Kyiv to keep eating away at Russia’s ground-based air defenses. Now, other Western-made armaments are reportedly being integrated with Ukrainian combat aircraft, perhaps including air-to-air and land attack missiles.

Since this process has started, Western defense firms might be inclined to offer this package to other operators of Russian-made fighter aircraft. Victory in some international arms competitions can depend on giving a potential client the widest number of options to choose from. The market for arming Russian aircraft with Western missiles may not be large (at least at first), but it is an option Western companies can propose to potential clients that their Russian counterparts cannot. Western firms could bill this weapons package as another alternative to new aircraft purchases, while exposing these clients to Western-made weaponry and perhaps influence future aircraft choices.

Whether this occurs or not, the war has done considerable damage to the reputation of Russian-made arms. Sadly, the blame for this can be laid at the feet of Russia’s leaders. Rome had some courageous and skillful leaders during the Republic and Empire periods. Unfortunately, the bravery of Roman troops in the Teutoburg Forest could not compensate for their leader’s mistakes.


The bolded about the AGM-88 is an understatement folks. This is where getting the F-16's online is a game changer.
 


"There are two Russian armies fighting in their invasion of Ukraine. There is the "second army" of the world with massive numbers of tanks and artillery pieces and soldiers that march with precision on Red Square and look like recruiting posters. This army is supported by a massive industrial base making "near peer" equipment at elevated rates.
Then there is another Russian army invading Ukraine. This one has lost 90% of its professional soldiers ("lifers" in US jargon). It is now filled with soldiers with 30 days or less training. Its officer corps depleted to a frction of the pre-war level. Never well-trained in manuever war or combined arms, this army uses clumsy tactics with little or no situational awareness. Vehicle drivers run over their own troops or into their own minefields. This army's generals order small unit attacks over and over again on the same avenues of approach that were dominated by the enemy the day before.
This second Russian army has blown through a massive amount of its first-line equipment. Older T62s from decades ago are seen in its formations and loss columns, because the first line T80/T72 modern versions are becoming scarce. This army's air defesne has proven far less capable than its published specifcations and has been pciked apart by droens and anti-radiation missiles. Self-propelled artillery seen in vast numbers on paper before the invasion are now repalced with ancvient D30 towed guins, vulnerable to counter-battery fire and drones. The second army is the real one.
The first army is the myth that Putin may still nourish, but - more importantly- the delusion that drives Western media to claim the war is a "stalemate" or that Russia can fight a long-war as it grows "stronger" deploying non-existent modern equipment and trained troops. The first zdrmy only appears in RedSquare films. The second one shows up in daily clips from the battlefield. THese clips seldom reported or published in Westgern popular media. The same media - ignorant of the battlefield reality- dutifully reports the lines on the map and concludes there is a stalemate. It feeds a narrative that more "resistance is futile" (Russians are the Borg). The scenario for the first army described is that Russia will never give up its occupied territories without a fight to the bitter end. The second army has lost effective control of Sevastapol and is losing its land bridge to Crimea due to long-range artillery fire and partisan warfare.
In this real world scenario, Russia has lost much of its basic war objectives and is relying entirely on a political effort to break Western will to supply Ukraine. The Russian losses, verified by third-parties, in the real world are staggering and accelrating. These have consumed the best Russian equipment and their best troops. The comments below have links to multiple sources and information describing this "second Russian army" - the real one. It is clear that Russia's only hope is to break Western will, which cannot be allowed to happen. Ukraine does not need a piece of paper that crates "peace" (they alreayd got one of those in Budapest). Ukraine just needs ammo, as Presdient Zellensky famously said. " #RussiaLosingBadly#UkraineMustWin
 
We won't even have to wait for Festivus for a milestone number like we did last year. The daily number of troops WIA/KIA the last few weeks has been averaging a little over 1000. They've been averaging well over 500 per day since the invasion began.

In the main 8 years of the Vietnam war we averaged less than 80 WIA/KIA per day. During our worst year we averaged less than 200 per day. A war that became untenable to maintain to our population.

Long story short, when will this Russian madness end? I know Putin and other high-level Russians don't care about the numbers. But you'd think the moms and dads of Russia would care at some point.
 
In addition, it appears that more intelligent military advisors have either convinced Putin that the use of nukes would have more negative than positive repercussions or the Russian nuclear threat doesn't exist.

I wouldn't claim it "doesn't exist".
Just think it is "substantially overblown".

US has spent more $$ on maintaining its nuclear arsenal, annually, than the entire Russian military budget. And we've now seen how ineffective the mainline Russian military is - much of that $$ that purportedly went to new tech and tanks actually got funneled to oligarch/military leader mansions and yachts.
 
We won't even have to wait for Festivus for a milestone number like we did last year. The daily number of troops WIA/KIA the last few weeks has been averaging a little over 1000. They've been averaging well over 500 per day since the invasion began.

In the main 8 years of the Vietnam war we averaged less than 80 WIA/KIA per day. During our worst year we averaged less than 200 per day. A war that became untenable to maintain to our population.

Long story short, when will this Russian madness end? I know Putin and other high-level Russians don't care about the numbers. But you'd think the moms and dads of Russia would care at some point.
Putin is using old Soviet military strategy. It's similar to rope a dope. He has more expendable crewmen than Ukraine.
 
A lot of videos today.

"FPV kamikaze of #Ukraine attacks Russian logistics truck convoy. Video from Ukrainian FPV. Also included in the reward is a new video of Russian soldiers after the attack."



"An Aeroflot Boeing 737, flying from Moscow to Yerevan on the morning of December 18, made an emergency landing at Sheremetyevo airport.The pilot decided to return to the starting point due to a failure of the1/front landing gear, an informed source told Channel Five. This is the 6th incident involving planes of Russia's largest air carrier since the beginning of the monthThe Federal Air Transport Agency indicated a few days ago that since At the start of the year, 670 aircraft failures had been recorded, so that makes it 671 now.After this statement from the ministry, Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin fired the deputy head of the Federal Air Transport Agency, Georgy Bakharev."

GBpT8mwX0AAUJ5p


 
Last edited:
Grab the giant Russian ammo dump! :)

Moldova does not have much of a military, but the max I have heard is 1500 Russians in Moldova. That number is most likely high, and I cannot imagine they are elite troops, or that they are well supplied. It's high time for Moldova to invite the Russians to leave. Start with subtle pressure, and appeal directly to the soldiers stationed there that they'd have a comfortable life until the war in Ukraine ends if they lay down their arms, and give up that massive stockpile of Soviet era shells.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT