ADVERTISEMENT

Translation needed

Joe is the current president, he's got the nuclear codes. Trump will be in prison or dead before long.

I'd hold Trump more accountable for his word salad if Harris wasn't as bad or worse. Trump is too old and run down to be president, Harris is just stupid.


He was the same dummy 8 years ago saying the dumbest of things. I don't remember this account calling him out at that time. Any evidence you have ever held him accountable? She is very clearly a vast improvement, even if one doesn't agree with some of her positions. No evidence of her being stupid, it's just a fox / con talking point. Can you show a history of saying incredibly stupid things? And not an interpretation, but her actual words? One offs and here and there isn't a sign of being stupid....
 
He was the same dummy 8 years ago saying the dumbest of things. I don't remember this account calling him out at that time. Any evidence you have ever held him accountable? She is very clearly a vast improvement, even if one doesn't agree with some of her positions. No evidence of her being stupid, it's just a fox / con talking point. Can you show a history of saying incredibly stupid things? And not an interpretation, but her actual words? One offs and here and there isn't a sign of being stupid....
Dude it's OUT THERE... it's only a fox / con talking point because just like with Joe's decline (another fox con talking point) the rest of the media ignores it and shields their audience from it.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sober_teacher
Play the tape.



MAGAts?? A little help? The best part is the applause at the end of that mosh pit of verbiage.
I'm just shocked you beat biggrey to the punch on this. Oh what's that he's a political hack and would never call out DonOLD.

For ****s sake biggrey let me help you out. "This is embarrassing! How dare his family allow this to go on! He should be allowed to enjoy his retirement. (Oh wait that's right the retirement home isn't waiting for Donny boy after he loses in November its a jail cell)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mattymoknows
Do you understand that what Trump is proposing will cause inflation?
These people are morons of course they don't understand that. And the inflation it would cause would make the inflation we've been going through look like a walk in the park. And yet if he did win and did this they would be twisting themselves into pretzels to explain how it isn't really that bad when it will be levels upon levels worse than the inflation they have railed against the last 3 years.
 
This is the type of Trump response I think of, and there are plenty of them, when folks say "Kamala is ignorant, she is stupid" but they don't bat an eye at Trump's idiotic nonsense. It fails to answer the question. It doesn't make sense from a QnA perspective. It doesn't follow basic economic rules and shows he has no understanding of how trade really works.

This is his level of ignorance on every topic, but she is the stupid one....
The man doesn't realize there is two definitions for the word asylum. Of course the majority of his supporters didn't know that either. The problem with idiots today is they don't realize they are morons. I blame the internet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
These people are morons of course they don't understand that. And the inflation it would cause would make the inflation we've been going through look like a walk in the park. And yet if he did win and did this they would be twisting themselves into pretzels to explain how it isn't really that bad when it will be levels upon levels worse than the inflation they have railed against the last 3 years.
I've got 3 years of rising wages, low unemployment, and low inflation before the scamdemic that says you're wrong.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
The man doesn't realize there is two definitions for the word asylum. Of course the majority of his supporters didn't know that either. The problem with idiots today is they don't realize they are morons. I blame the internet.
The real problem is only a small fraction of the illegal border crossings are from people truly seeking asylum.
 
He was the same dummy 8 years ago saying the dumbest of things. I don't remember this account calling him out at that time. Any evidence you have ever held him accountable? She is very clearly a vast improvement, even if one doesn't agree with some of her positions. No evidence of her being stupid, it's just a fox / con talking point. Can you show a history of saying incredibly stupid things? And not an interpretation, but her actual words? One offs and here and there isn't a sign of being stupid....
Here's a gem about coffee lids

not sure what is so funny
 
I'm looking for the difference between that non-answer and any answer we've heard from Harris/Walz.

I can't. At least he took questions I guess... He also posted his policy positions to his website. He can't articulate them but somebody wrote some...

:oops:

FYI...Newsnation has a language expert analyzing this exact question now (Trump's childcare word salad), and in typical Newsnation fashion, they're covering both sides of the issue.
 
Last edited:
I'm looking for the difference between that non-answer and any answer we've heard from Harris/Walz.

I can't. At least he took questions I guess... He also posted his policy positions to his website. He can't articulate them but somebody wrote some...

:oops:

FYI...Newsnation has a language expert analyzing this exact question now (Trump's childcare word salad), and in typical Newsnation fashion, they're covering both sides of the issue.
OK. Post a few answers from Harris/Walz that you feel are comparable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
OK. Post a few answers from Harris/Walz that you feel are comparable.
Not worth the time. We've all seen the many instances of Harris word salad. It's why she doesn't talk now and likely why more than half of her recent interview was edited out before it was aired.

We also know trump is often woefully general when asked about anything he wants to do.
 
Not worth the time. We e all seen the many instances of Harris word salad. It's why she doesn't talk now and likely why more than half of her recent interview was edited out before it was aired.
"I'm looking for the difference between that non-answer and any answer we've heard from Harris/Walz."

You said any answer. Post just one. Otherwise we'll all assume you're being dishonest.
 
"I'm looking for the difference between that non-answer and any answer we've heard from Harris/Walz."

You said any answer. Post just one. Otherwise we'll all assume you're being dishonest.
The one Newsnation used was the one about "time" that we've all seen. You can look up the exact quote. It's not worth my time.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
I'm not sure which rambling speech he was referring to, but he was just doing the weave. English professors say it's brilliant

 
Translation:
The federal government has no responsibility in subsidizing the cost of child care, if you want handouts go elsewhere.
So if that's what he said, then why didn't he just say that?

Man, you people are just so full of shit. He says Argle Gargle Bargle Dargle and you turn it into whatever you want. 45% plus of the country.

He tells it like it is!$!!

Man, we're so effed as a country.
 


She is trying to relate, I'm guessing to a bunch of women who can relate to an issue about lipstick. I can't relate to it, but clearly they did somewhat based on the laughter. Her laugh seems to be part of being very nervous talking in front of a large group of people. Overlaughing is a sign of nerves. But, that was a very linear and cognitive story and I can understand her point.

However, my post was asking about a speech that makes her look stupid. Unrelatable, yes, stupid, no. And that is your best evidence of stupid? You have failed again, but keep beating the fox/con drum.
 
She is trying to relate, I'm guessing to a bunch of women who can relate to an issue about lipstick. I can't relate to it, but clearly they did somewhat based on the laughter. Her laugh seems to be part of being very nervous talking in front of a large group of people. Overlaughing is a sign of nerves. But, that was a very linear and cognitive story and I can understand her point.

However, my post was asking about a speech that makes her look stupid. Unrelatable, yes, stupid, no. And that is your best evidence of stupid? You have failed again, but keep beating the fox/con drum.


The passage of time

heres another one from the hit list

Do you want the school bus one next?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
Yup, Kamala has on occasion given nonsensical answers, like most politicians out there. Won’t argue that.

Trump does this on a near-daily basis and yet you want to argue like they’re equivalent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: funksouljon
Yup, Kamala has on occasion given nonsensical answers, like most politicians out there. Won’t argue that.

Trump does this on a near-daily basis and yet you want to argue like they’re equivalent.
They are man. Trump is a shit option, but Harris isn't any prize either. There's a reason she couldn't move the needle as a candidate 4 years ago, and a reason she had an approval rating under Joe'sas his VP.

She's flipped on every stated position she held as a candidate and every confirmed position she took as a Senator.
 


Watched most of those, they are just things I don't care about. However, commuting on a bus with no exhaust, with wifi and charging IS a great feature for people who need it. I loved having a bus similar to that when I was commuting to Denver daily. The passage of time was certainly NOT a cohesive thought, no argument. And I said in another thread, she can be a rambling talker when she is in a topic she isn't knowledgable about. I've stated that. But school bus people love school buses. just like train people love trains, esp when it is their livelihood.

You don't seem to understand the difference between a topic you don't care about and a person who cannot express themselves because they themselves are stupid. She is catering to the audience. This is a YOU problem because you don't see the world beyond yourself. I don't care about them either, but she is talking to the audience's subjects.

Again, going back to the original statement (not your updated position that she switches stances). Yes she rambled about the passage of time, but the posts you think are "examples of stupidity" are horrible examples. You can't support your position so are shifting the topic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KFsdisciple
Now this is an example of someone who is stupid, and just says words since he cannot speak to a topic. And most of what he says is demonstrably false and easy to prove as a BS lie.



These 2 are not equal. And I've said it before, she wasn't my first choice, but she isn't a bad option. We also covered in another thread what the minimum criteria is to be a good candidate and while it pains many to admit, she actually checks a lot of boxes.

No one will ever convince you otherwise, but these 2 are not equal. She isn't a great option (however, Im coming around to her), but she certainly isn't a bad option. He is the worst in a very long time, possibly ever.
 
Watched most of those, they are just things I don't care about. However, commuting on a bus with no exhaust, with wifi and charging IS a great feature for people who need it. I loved having a bus similar to that when I was commuting to Denver daily. The passage of time was certainly NOT a cohesive thought, no argument. And I said in another thread, she can be a rambling talker when she is in a topic she isn't knowledgable about. I've stated that. But school bus people love school buses. just like train people love trains, esp when it is their livelihood.

You don't seem to understand the difference between a topic you don't care about and a person who cannot express themselves because they themselves are stupid. She is catering to the audience. This is a YOU problem because you don't see the world beyond yourself. I don't care about them either, but she is talking to the audience's subjects.

Again, going back to the original statement (not your updated position that she switches stances). Yes she rambled about the passage of time, but the posts you think are "examples of stupidity" are horrible examples. You can't support your position so are shifting the topic.
Yeah I mean if they're wearing your team's jersey, you'll look past a lot of things. She's not a strong candidate but she has a fighting chance to win because there's zero gray area for Trump. People love him or hate him. There's enough people that hate him that led to Joe Biden getting the most votes ever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: franklinman
Long post...don't read it.

The real problem here is the "MSM" and it's inability to tell the simple truth. Parker Malloy went on a snipe hunt and bagged her limit:

Here's Trump's actual answer (good luck):

Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care. You have to have it — in this country you have to have it.

But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly — and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take.

I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about.

We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible [country that can] afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again, we have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.

Here's the media coverage 🤬🤬🤬:

NYT Michael Gold: After his speech, Donald Trump was asked how he might address rising child care costs. In a jumbled answer, he said he would prioritize legislation on the issue but offered no specifics and insisted that his other economic policies, including tariffs, would “take care” of child care. “As much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.

Politico: He also pledged to tackle government inefficiency with a new Elon Musk-inspired commission and to launch a sovereign wealth fund with money collected from tariffs to finance everything from infrastructure projects and child-care costs to paying down the national debt — moves that might ease concerns about the fiscal impact of his agenda.

Newsweek: The rising cost of child care is a core issue for some American families already grappling with inflation and the cost of living, but where do the presidential candidates stand on lessening the burden for voters?

Former President Donald Trump was pressed on his plans to address child care costs during an appearance before the Economic Club of New York on Thursday, during which the Republican nominee promoted his fiscal policy as a solution to the rising prices of everyday necessities. When asked by Girls Who Code founder Reshma Saujani if he would "commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable" if reelected to office, Trump told the panel of business leaders that his plans to increase taxes on imports could "take care" of rising costs like child care.

"Child care is child care, it's something you have to have in this country," Trump said, who also touted efforts by his daughter, Ivanka, to address child care costs during his first presidency.


Fortune: Former President Donald Trump suggested to business leaders Thursday that his plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports would solve seemingly unrelated challenges such as the rising cost of child care in the U.S.


What. The. Actual. Fvck??? Aaron Rupar calls it "sane-washing"...making Trump's incoherent blitherings sound reasonable.
 
Last edited:
Long post...don't read it.

The real problem here is the "MSM" and it's inability to tell the simple truth. Parker Malloy went on a snipe hunt and bagged his limit:

Here's Trump's actual answer (good luck):

Well, I would do that, and we’re sitting down, and I was, somebody, we had Sen. Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that, because, look, child care is child care. You have to have it — in this country you have to have it.

But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to — but they’ll get used to it very quickly — and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take.

I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about.

We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible [country that can] afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again, we have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it. Thank you. Very good question. Thank you.

Here's the media coverage 🤬🤬🤬:

NYT Michael Gold: After his speech, Donald Trump was asked how he might address rising child care costs. In a jumbled answer, he said he would prioritize legislation on the issue but offered no specifics and insisted that his other economic policies, including tariffs, would “take care” of child care. “As much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in.

Politico: He also pledged to tackle government inefficiency with a new Elon Musk-inspired commission and to launch a sovereign wealth fund with money collected from tariffs to finance everything from infrastructure projects and child-care costs to paying down the national debt — moves that might ease concerns about the fiscal impact of his agenda.

Newsweek: The rising cost of child care is a core issue for some American families already grappling with inflation and the cost of living, but where do the presidential candidates stand on lessening the burden for voters?

Former President Donald Trump was pressed on his plans to address child care costs during an appearance before the Economic Club of New York on Thursday, during which the Republican nominee promoted his fiscal policy as a solution to the rising prices of everyday necessities. When asked by Girls Who Code founder Reshma Saujani if he would "commit to prioritizing legislation to make child care affordable" if reelected to office, Trump told the panel of business leaders that his plans to increase taxes on imports could "take care" of rising costs like child care.

"Child care is child care, it's something you have to have in this country," Trump said, who also touted efforts by his daughter, Ivanka, to address child care costs during his first presidency.


Fortune: Former President Donald Trump suggested to business leaders Thursday that his plans to increase tariffs on foreign imports would solve seemingly unrelated challenges such as the rising cost of child care in the U.S.


What. The. Actual. Fvck??? Aaron Rupar calls it "sane-washing"...making Trump's incoherent blitherings sound reasonable.
How the media has covered that comment have been absolutely ridiculous.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT