Now what's so goldarn funny?!!
How many ‘globalists’ in this picture?
..
.
Now what's so goldarn funny?!!
How many ‘globalists’ in this picture?
..
.
How does that square with "You will own nothing ... " ?The agenda of the wef is promoting capitalism.
Oh I have to accept your characterization of what the WEF is?How does that square with "you will own nothing ... " ?
Well obviously the darting gaze of Zuck upon the globes to his left would qualify him.
I guess y'all are totally down with the agenda of the WEF?
Hold it!Oh I have to accept your characterization of what the WEF is?
What is globalism then, and what do you support in contrast to globalism? It seems to me the options here are globalism, imperialism, and autarky.Hold it!
Are you suggesting that we can each believe what we want to believe and so you therefore regret challenging my positions in the first place?
Very well then.
It was a video, he “clearly” is not in Davos. He didn’t talk about himself a lot. The op was @bcherod so not surprising it is largely made up. The video is online and available to be viewed.I’m not sure he’s physically present - I thought I read that it was a zoom thing?
He has a trip planned to North Carolina and then SoCal tomorrow and that would be a tough slog.
There are some tough things being said that the Europeans never like.
LOL Milei (Argentina) who is not exactly a shrinking violet said Davos is crumbling. 😲
Jamie Dimon earlier this week sort of lent support to Trump (hmm - planned?) by giving hints he thought tariffs might not be horrible if it meant the US would be more “secure”.
FYI I am not sure the majority of Americans are paying close attention to Davos because Trump is so busy issuing EO’s every fifteen minutes here at home. 🤪
I think I should at least get a little bit of credit for the Zuckerberg joke. That wasn't funny at all???
Is it just me or is Zuckerberg looking more and more like someone who would murder a lover on a yacht in the middle of Caribbean?How many ‘globalists’ in this picture?
..
.
So have we abandoned the "living on a globe" definition?What is globalism then, and what do you support in contrast to globalism? It seems to me the options here are globalism, imperialism, and autarky.
No but they sure want to use it further there global control over all of us.you don't really think the world economic forum really gives a shit about climate change, do you?
i'm sure that ranks right up there with "concern for economic well being of under-developed nations"
So have we abandoned the "living on a globe" definition?
Well the the textbook version is some kumbaya vision of everyone living in peace and harmony through interconnectedness. In practice though, it sounds much more like Klaus Schwab.
Oh puhleese."Globalism" is just international commerce. Which happens to be very capitalistic in nature and compatible with the interests of the participants in the WEF who are capitalists. Your conception of this is very Bircher like (which is to say it reminds me of the people who thought Eisenhower was a commie).