Ok I can't resist this... Fing "looser" ???? Hahahahahaha. You. Are. Stupid. 😂Sabula thinks Trump did it because cnn told him he did. Fing looser
Ok I can't resist this... Fing "looser" ???? Hahahahahaha. You. Are. Stupid. 😂Sabula thinks Trump did it because cnn told him he did. Fing looser
You must've had no daughters, right?
Trump won the popular vote when everyone in the country believed him over this liar. You can post a million smiley faces. Your Trump derangement lost. You lost. You are a looser and will always be a looser.What I think matters not. Who cares... I guess besides you? What does the court system and appeals court system think? 🤣😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Let me remind you... FOUND. SEXUAL. ABUSER. So sad for the USA.
Looser?? 😂😂😂😂😂😂Trump won the popular vote when everyone in the country believed him over this liar. You can post a million smiley faces. Your Trump derangement lost. You lost. You are a looser and will always be a looser.
Trump had his chance to poke holes in her story. He failed. Completely. Then he took it to appeals court. And failed. Completely. If she's making it up then Trump must be one worthless sonabitch to not be able to counter any of this.So, Believe All Women? Because you have daughters?
Because women are as pure as the fresh-driven snow and would never lie about something like this?
Kyle must not be very smart. This was a civil trial, not a criminal trial. There is no guilt associated with a finding in a civil trial, that's only in a criminal trial. In the civil trial he was found by a unanimous jury verdict to be a sexual abuser. Even you knew that. Kyle must be real stupid because the defamation had nothing to do with the results of him being found to be a sexual abuser in the civil trial. And by the way, Bonespurs asking for a new trial was summarily rejected by the Appeals court. No surprise there given they rejected the appeal outright. Citing no reason for a new trial. What does all that mean? That he's been found to be a sexual abuser. We all knew that.
If it was so horrible, why is it so hard for you to produce a legal reasoning to overturn the verdict of the jury?Trump is an asshole and probably deserves everything he gets.
BUT this sets a terrible precedent that the #MeToo "believe all women" movement laid the groundwork for.
How many innocent men are being Kangaroo Court'd because of NY State law? No statute of limitations? That's BS.
It’s New York, they would have found Trump guilty of loiteringWeird flex. Your guy was merely found liable for rape.
Carroll testified, and two other women testified. All three women are liars? Shouldn't they be investigate for conspiring against Trump?So, Believe All Women? Because you have daughters?
Because women are as pure as the fresh-driven snow and would never lie about something like this?
Should the jury members, DA, and judge be investigated? Did the witnesses commit perjury? Were the appeals court judges also in on the conspiracy to get Trump?It’s New York, they would have found Trump guilty of loitering
Kyle must not be very smart. This was a civil trial, not a criminal trial. There is no guilt associated with a finding in a civil trial, that's only in a criminal trial. In the civil trial he was found by a unanimous jury verdict to be a sexual abuser. Even you knew that. Kyle must be real stupid
Trump had his chance to poke holes in her story. He failed. Completely. Then he took it to appeals court. And failed. Completely. If she's making it up then Trump must be one worthless sonabitch to not be able to counter any of this.
Just going off memory here, but didn't Trump say E Jean wasn't his type. Then they showed him a picture of her and asked who it was? And he said she was his ex wife?It was a NEW YORK CITY jury! No way they were unbiased.
Ah yes, the excuse of the loser. (CORRECT SPELLING) The referees did it, the jury did it, always an excuse. Here's the end of the story. Found. Sexual. Abuser. So sadIt was a NEW YORK CITY jury! No way they were unbiased.
THAT IS NOT PROOF, as long as we are saying things in all caps.It was a NEW YORK CITY jury! No way they were unbiased.
HOW DARE THE JURY BELIEVE THREE WOMEN!!!!!Just going off memory here, but didn't Trump say E Jean wasn't his type. Then they showed him a picture of her and asked who it was? And he said she was his ex wife?
Like I said, he's one dumb sonavabitch. Whole court room must have collectively slapped their foreheads after that.
Is there proof she consented? Seriously, I have no idea, so I would to see proof that she consented.
HOW DARE THE JURY BELIEVE THREE WOMEN!!!!!
Why didn't Trump testify that he wasn't there? He has one of the keenest minds ever known to humanity. Why didn't he obliterate her from the witness stand?Three women testifying about something that supposedly happened three decades ago....
Where were you on the night of July 16, 1995?
Hell, the "victim" doesn't even remember if it happened in 1995 or 1996.
It's funny to watch the people who get themselves twisted up in knots over a trans citizen going into a bathroom to expel waste from their body go to extremes to defend a man proven to have assaulted a woman in a dressing room.
What in the world does this fraud have to do with transvestites going into the women's room ? What planet are you on ? Trump won on this issue. No transvestites in the women's room, why do you have a problem with that ? Do you need to go in the women's room ? Why do you need to. Your derangement handed Trump the election.It's funny to watch the people who get themselves twisted up in knots over a trans citizen going into a bathroom to expel waste from their body go to extremes to defend a man proven to have assaulted a woman in a dressing room.
New York has been bending over backwards to not find him guilty of things for decades.It’s New York, they would have found Trump guilty of loitering
I've seen the left fight to keep violent arsonists and murderers on the streets for years, so maybe.New York has been bending over backwards to not find him guilty of things for decades.
I wouldn't go anywhere with Trump. He'd probably try to rape me.Why would she go into a dressing room with him in the first place? That's not normal.
I'm sorry, I can't punch down on you anymore tonight. You'll just have to figure out why Trump raped Carroll on your own.Why would she go into a dressing room with him in the first place? That's not normal.
Why won't you answer the question? Don't be afraid.So, Believe All Women? Because you have daughters?
Because women are as pure as the fresh-driven snow and would never lie about something like this?
Please stop fantasizing publiclyI wouldn't go anywhere with Trump. He'd probably try to rape me.
To be more accurate, it’s a fvcking joke, not to be taken seriously, as normal Americans demonstrated on Election Day.I guess being found liable for "just" sexual assault is okay in your eyes.
Though jurors in federal court in Manhattan did not find that Trump, 78, committed rape, they awarded the former Elle magazine advice columnist $2.02 million for sexual assault and $2.98 million for defamation.
Whatever helps you sleep, but how are you going to take the next 4 years?It is not alleged anymore. The trial is over. He's a legally found sexual abuser. And yep, in this case he was guilty of it 30 years ago. So sad he did that.
You are a looser and will always be a looser.
So what’s your point?This alleged "sexual abuse" happened almost 30 years ago.
You said she consented. I asked for proof that she consented, you couldn’t provide any proof so your statement is inaccurate and false.When did I claim there was any proof for either side? She just sat up in the jury box and told her story and the jury ate it up.
perhaps... fire the prosecutor or they won't get the billion dollars... well son of a bitchShould the jury members, DA, and judge be investigated? Did the witnesses commit perjury? Were the appeals court judges also in on the conspiracy to get Trump?
So, for the record, you approve of sexual assault as long as the person committing it is one you support. How very Christian of you.To be more accurate, it’s a fvcking joke, not to be taken seriously, as normal Americans demonstrated on Election Day.
Sort of like a liberal could never get a fair hearing in front of a federal judge in Amarillo Texas right? Also, all of you who criticize this jury's verdict, while simultaneously advocating for the death penalty look incredibly stupid.Yeah, like he'd ever get a fair trial and an unbiased jury in New York of all places.