I don't think saying that this didn't rise to the level of an insurrection as strong of a point as you think it is. We disagree in that I think seditious conspiracy is a serious charge and demonstrates that people participating in this riot had more intentions than just being disruptive.First, a few people being charged with seditious conspiracy does not an insurrection make when you have a crowd of 10,000.
Second, you said "A lot of the more heinous acts in the Minneapolis riots were not as well documented.". This is completely false. They DID have the documentation to charge hundreds of people with the more serious crimes. The travisty is that they decided to charge them with misdemeanors and then later dropped the charges.
If you have evidence of prosecutors having evidence to pursue serious charges and choosing not to then I would like to see it.
Even if I accept your argument that there was under enforcement following the riots in Minneapolis. I don't see how the remedy to this is to lessen the sentence or charges on people involved in an entirely different incident.