Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.
Yes, because that serves American's best interest. US based, Iranian Intelligence Operatives be like:Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.
Don't agree with him on everything but he certainly does seem to say exactly what he thinks.I like John Bolton. He’s not afraid to tell anyone his opinions.
He probably is now. Trump just put a target on his back.I like John Bolton. He’s not afraid to tell anyone his opinions.
FIFYTrump hates the truth.
Why does Bolton need a taxpayer funded security detail?Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.
Former officials tend to get this when needed.Why does Bolton need a taxpayer funded security detail?
Why did Trump need taxpayer funded security detail, how far down this rabbit hole do we need to go.Why does Bolton need a taxpayer funded security detail?
Ummmm, Bolton has never been POUT or VPOTUS. The difference should be apparent.Why did Trump need taxpayer funded security detail, how far down this rabbit hole do we need to go.
So former high ranking officials that are under threat of assassination by a foreign enemy -- in this case it was attempted in retaliation for the Trump admin's assassination of Qasem Soleimani in 2020 -- shouldn't be offered protection?Ummmm, Bolton has never been POUT or VPOTUS. The difference should be apparent.
Bolton has been a public war monger far after leaving his former high level government positions.
I could care less, just wanted to get someone going . . . you took the bait.Ummmm, Bolton has never been POUT or VPOTUS. The difference should be apparent.
Bolton has been a public war monger far after leaving his former high level government positions.
Finance won’t admit it, but he’s a maga dunce that worships orange turd.So former high ranking officials that are under threat of assassination by a foreign enemy -- in this case it was attempted in retaliation for the Trump admin's assassination of Qasem Soleimani in 2020 -- shouldn't be offered protection?
Odd take.
Good.Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.
Bolton is probably pretty representative of security officials in most Republican administrations for decades.Bolton's war mongering scum. Trump showed NO judgement in hiring him.
Please don’t feed the trolls.Why.
I believe I already said he was war mongering scum. They don't call the GOP the War Party for nothing.Bolton is probably pretty representative of security officials in most Republican administrations for decades.
Part of the broader point I was making there is that Bolton type people have fixtures in US politics for a long time. Why in particular people are just now freaking out about Bolton.... (well, it's because he criticized Trump)I believe I already said he was war mongering scum. They don't call the GOP the War Party for nothing.
I could care less, just wanted to get someone going . . . you took the bait.
Nope, justice!Vengeance is his top priority.
So you are against former officials not receiving any protection -- even if still under threat -- when they leave the white house. (besides presidents, apparently)There are a myriad of ways that a private citizen can protect themself.
FIFYSo former high ranking officials that are under threat of assassination by a foreign enemy -- in this case it was attempted in retaliation for the Trump admin's assassination of Qasem Soleimani in 2020 -- shouldn't be offered protection?
Partisan hack take.
Trump supporters thought he was great when hired but then turned on him when Trump did.Part of the broader point I was making there is that Bolton type people have fixtures in US politics for a long time. Why in particular people are just now freaking out about Bolton.... (well, it's because he criticized Trump)
Does Bolton still need a security detail? How long when someone is out of gov’t office do people generally get a security detail?Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.
But of course this wasn’t done with any malice or ill intent or sending a message. Just someone who should no longer have a detail and we just announced it the world. It’s the most beautiful thing.Does Bolton still need a security detail? How long when someone is out of gov’t office do people generally get a security detail?
Where do we draw the line on tax-payer funding of such protection for former government officials?So you are against former officials not receiving any protection -- even if still under threat -- when they leave the white house. (besides presidents, apparently)
Why is this such a big issue with you?But of course this wasn’t done with any malice or ill intent or sending a message. Just someone who should no longer have a detail and we just announced it the world. It’s the most beautiful thing.
I don't see the need to draw a hard line on this sort of thing given that it's not going to be often used and won't follow most people forever.Where do we draw the line on tax-payer funding of such protection for former government officials?
Depends on the level of threat he is under. Given that we have a president that is notoriously vindictive and thin skinned it's not hard to imagine that the move was in retaliation for Bolton speaking negatively of said president.Does Bolton still need a security detail? How long when someone is out of gov’t office do people generally get a security detail?
You guys need your nose rubbed in your shit like you're a little puppy. The rescission of Bolton's security detail is about revenge by Trump against Bolton. It doesn't have anything to do with ANYTHING ELSE. You know that, and that's what kind of a completely scummy and depraved human being Trump is. Deal with it for once.Does Bolton still need a security detail?
Great example of Trump's terrible character. Removes security detail on a man purely on the basis of personal grievances.