Trumps name appears in the first release of Epstein documents
- Thread starter Chishawk1425
- Start date
No.
I said "you guys get a lot of play out of the word rape". Where as you just noted it was assualt. "Rape" means something. As I have always said, If I looked at you and said "That dude raped a chick" finger banging her through her dress wouldn't be your image of "rape". It still is entirely inappropriate but that isn't "rape".
This thread is a LWCJ a/k/a a left wing echo chamber.
Link to the criminal conviction? Guilty means criminal. Because proof does matter to me. Which makes me very different than you.
HEY, GOOGLE!!!!!!!!!!!
Yes?
Define Rape and Sexual Assault, please.
OK
Definition of Rape:
Rape is a form of sexual assault that involves non-consensual sexual intercourse or penetration, typically by force, threat, coercion, or when the victim is incapable of giving consent (e.g., due to intoxication, unconsciousness, or mental incapacity). The specific legal definition varies by jurisdiction, but it generally includes vaginal, anal, or oral penetration without consent.Definition of Sexual Assault:
Sexual assault is a broader term that includes any non-consensual sexual contact or behavior, not limited to penetration. It can include unwanted touching, groping, coercion, forced sexual acts, and other forms of sexual violence. Like rape, sexual assault is defined differently depending on state and federal laws but always involves a lack of consent.You take your legal advice from Google? The bigger takeaway is your admission that you have to use Google, and based on your posts, probably regularly.
What's the burn here? That he knows how to use Google?
She supposedly didn't scream and didn't tell him no. She felt she didn't have to.
Again, touching a woman's privates without her consent is wrong. It is sexual assualt in my opinion. I just feel the dems have gotten a SHIT TON of play out of a guy grabbing a girls crotch.
"Rape", in my opinion invokes a much uglier image.
just an incredible sentence
Yeah, you would have to read the 6 or 7 around it to actually understand what a guy is trying to say.
The only reason that it was, was there were other names involved, as in Bill Clinton.
That's the best you've got?
That's the director of the FBI. Some shits about to get ****ed.
I believe kash will do the exact opposite of his message. FBI is now a Republican Party political organization. Can’t believe anything from them now.
He's a pathetic joke, criminal and a full on loyalist to the Felon and Chief. I am not an absolute Idiot so I didn't vote for this
SDNY will be tough to get under control. Both the FBI and one of the US Attorneys.
Bondi was more easily confirmed. This makes me wonder. It was still largely along party lines, but the neocon Republicans didn’t resist. I think Fetterman was the Democrat that defected.
Bondi should have known things would be in possession of SDNY.
Bondi is expendable in my view.
Kash is the last great hope. Maybe. But I wonder if this is all a big nothing burger. They konw what’s there, at least what hasn’t been destroyed. Or they should know.
The most interesting thing about all of this so far is the whistleblower. That’s the person I want to hear from the most.
Anyway, it’s largely known and largely a distraction for the masses. And the masses is a valid “both sides” situation here.
That's the director of the FBI not doing jack s***, just putting on a f****** Twitter s*** show for his audience.
Only fools believe in these shysters
Hi Brian. You are an idiot, we know this. Does Iowa even let people with your criminal history vote? Nice you found this groundbreaking news from 2021, great work.
He's just another slime ball who figured out he can make quite a career out of catering to lunatics
This is not a fight you want to make. Just giving some friendly advice.
If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, yep, it's a duck.
Even psychos think this is a joke.
This is like a grade school play, I feel bad laughing at the toddlers
