ADVERTISEMENT

Twitter slaps NPR with a dubious new tag: ‘State-affiliated media’

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,614
59,173
113
What a frickin' joke:

Is NPR “U.S. state-affiliated media”?
Twitter and its new owner, Elon Musk, seem to think so. Over NPR’s protests, Twitter placed that label on its account Tuesday night, implying that the Washington-based nonprofit news organization is somehow connected to, if not controlled by, the federal government.

The designation puts NPR, which has 8.8 million followers on the site, in the same category as propaganda outlets like the Russian-government-owned RT and the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily newspaper. Both are also “state-affiliated media,” according to Twitter.

Notably, however, Twitter has not slapped that label on several media organizations that are substantially funded by government. The Voice of America, the BBC and the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, among others, continue on Twitter without being designated as “state-affiliated” — a phrase with strong connotations of compromised editorial independence.

NPR does rely on some government funding, both directly and indirectly through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, an agency set up by Congress decades ago to fund public radio and TV with taxpayers’ money. CPB is slated to receive $525 million in its next fiscal year — money that goes to PBS, NPR and hundreds of public TV and radio stations. Conservatives have tried for years to “zero out” these federal contributions.


ADVERTISING


From its founding in 1970, NPR has asserted that it is editorially independent of any government agency or funding source (NPR also receives revenue from advertising and donations).
It asked Twitter to remove the “state” designation late Tuesday when it first appeared. In a statement Wednesday, president and chief executive John Lansing said: “We were disturbed to see last night that Twitter has labeled NPR as ‘state-affiliated media.’ … NPR and our Member stations are supported by millions of listeners who depend on us for the independent, fact-based journalism we provide. NPR stands for freedom of speech and holding the powerful accountable. It is unacceptable for Twitter to label us this way.”
Aside from the unsavory suggestion that its reporting is tainted, a state-affiliated media organization faces practical consequences under Twitter’s rules. Twitter says it “will not recommend or amplify [such] accounts or their tweets,” a policy that could affect the account’s reach and that of its advertisers.



Twitter hasn’t explained why it placed the label on NPR, but its action appears to be consistent with Musk’s often arbitrary and punitive decisions regarding news-media accounts since buying the company last year for $44 billion.
It appears, however, to be inconsistent with Twitter’s own rules.
Twitter’s published rules define “state-affiliated media” as “outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.”
It added: “State-financed media organizations with editorial independence, like the BBC in the UK and NPR in the US, for example, are not defined as state-affiliated media for the purposes of this policy.”

But another version of the rules published Tuesday eliminated NPR from that sentence.



Musk has previously targeted news organizations and journalists; in December, he suspended the accounts of about a dozen journalists at The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN and others for reporting on a controversial Twitter account that had tracked his jet travels, saying the journalists had provided “assassination coordinates” by reporting the story.
More recently, he began removing from some news organizations’ accounts the blue check marks that signal that their identities are verified. The news organizations have declined to pay Twitter for the previously free check mark. The New York Times, for example, is no longer checked; NPR is.
On Tuesday, Musk weighed in with a tweet about NPR’s new label. Over a tweet of a screenshot of Twitter’s rules about state affiliation, he wrote, “Seems accurate.”
Asked for further comment via email on Tuesday, Twitter’s press shop responded with the same automated response to every news-media request: a poop emoji.
 
  • Like
Reactions: h-hawk
If NPR isn't a federal government channel, what is it? It's almost like Alice in Wonderland for the left. Men can have babies, CO2 is air pollution and NPR isn't a government channel. Are we on Candid Camera?
 
If NPR isn't a federal government channel, what is it? It's almost like Alice in Wonderland for the left. Men can have babies, CO2 is air pollution and NPR isn't a government channel. Are we on Candid Camera?

As mentioned in the OP, Voice of America and Stars and Stripes.
 
It is a state affiliated media company so what’s the problem?
 
So is Twitter labeling Fox news an entertainment source because that is what Fox claims they are.
You have a problem with that, but you don't have a problem with a man calling himself a women or a women calling herself a man just because they "identify" that way? In one giant step the left leaped from anyone ought to be able to love anyone they choose, to anyone ought to "Be" anyone they choose, just insanity.
 
The cringe tingle extends past the ends all of my limbs whenever Abby posts and I can't help but imagining him explaining something incorrectly to some random guy he met out and about in public while his kids stand there embarrassed by his confidence. Anyone else?
He is the weirdest poster I’ve ever seen on here.

It’s like you pull the string hanging from his back and he’ll spit out some random talking points and non sequiturs barely connected to the topic at hand, if at all.
 
I considered the Louis Rukeyser and John McLaughlin shows to be mandatory viewing back in the day. Both conservative journalists on NPR.

I know, that was a long time ago, but the history is important.

As well as David Gergen. They still have con voices. I hear Republican politicians on Iowa PR all the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindemann
As well as David Gergen. They still have con voices. I hear Republican politicians on Iowa PR all the time.
IPR covers Iowa politics better than any of the local TV available in eastern and central Iowa. NPR national news is kind of needless with how many non-public broadcasting outlets there are but I can understand people preferring it to many other national news outlets. For local, especially in a place like Iowa, no substitute for something like IPR.
 
WRONG!!!!
Jack Germond!.....


WRONG!!!!
Eleanor Clift!!!

NEXT TOPIC!!!!
dana carvey derek stevens comeback GIF by Saturday Night Live
 
What a frickin' joke:

Is NPR “U.S. state-affiliated media”?
Twitter and its new owner, Elon Musk, seem to think so. Over NPR’s protests, Twitter placed that label on its account Tuesday night, implying that the Washington-based nonprofit news organization is somehow connected to, if not controlled by, the federal government.

The designation puts NPR, which has 8.8 million followers on the site, in the same category as propaganda outlets like the Russian-government-owned RT and the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily newspaper. Both are also “state-affiliated media,” according to Twitter.

Notably, however, Twitter has not slapped that label on several media organizations that are substantially funded by government. The Voice of America, the BBC and the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, among others, continue on Twitter without being designated as “state-affiliated” — a phrase with strong connotations of compromised editorial independence.

NPR does rely on some government funding, both directly and indirectly through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, an agency set up by Congress decades ago to fund public radio and TV with taxpayers’ money. CPB is slated to receive $525 million in its next fiscal year — money that goes to PBS, NPR and hundreds of public TV and radio stations. Conservatives have tried for years to “zero out” these federal contributions.


ADVERTISING


From its founding in 1970, NPR has asserted that it is editorially independent of any government agency or funding source (NPR also receives revenue from advertising and donations).
It asked Twitter to remove the “state” designation late Tuesday when it first appeared. In a statement Wednesday, president and chief executive John Lansing said: “We were disturbed to see last night that Twitter has labeled NPR as ‘state-affiliated media.’ … NPR and our Member stations are supported by millions of listeners who depend on us for the independent, fact-based journalism we provide. NPR stands for freedom of speech and holding the powerful accountable. It is unacceptable for Twitter to label us this way.”
Aside from the unsavory suggestion that its reporting is tainted, a state-affiliated media organization faces practical consequences under Twitter’s rules. Twitter says it “will not recommend or amplify [such] accounts or their tweets,” a policy that could affect the account’s reach and that of its advertisers.



Twitter hasn’t explained why it placed the label on NPR, but its action appears to be consistent with Musk’s often arbitrary and punitive decisions regarding news-media accounts since buying the company last year for $44 billion.
It appears, however, to be inconsistent with Twitter’s own rules.
Twitter’s published rules define “state-affiliated media” as “outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.”
It added: “State-financed media organizations with editorial independence, like the BBC in the UK and NPR in the US, for example, are not defined as state-affiliated media for the purposes of this policy.”

But another version of the rules published Tuesday eliminated NPR from that sentence.



Musk has previously targeted news organizations and journalists; in December, he suspended the accounts of about a dozen journalists at The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN and others for reporting on a controversial Twitter account that had tracked his jet travels, saying the journalists had provided “assassination coordinates” by reporting the story.
More recently, he began removing from some news organizations’ accounts the blue check marks that signal that their identities are verified. The news organizations have declined to pay Twitter for the previously free check mark. The New York Times, for example, is no longer checked; NPR is.
On Tuesday, Musk weighed in with a tweet about NPR’s new label. Over a tweet of a screenshot of Twitter’s rules about state affiliation, he wrote, “Seems accurate.”
Asked for further comment via email on Tuesday, Twitter’s press shop responded with the same automated response to every news-media request: a poop emoji.
NPR is garbage. I give it a fair try every now and then on the way home from work. They did a 20 minute piece in discrimination in home lending: Blacks get less loans, get turned down more, etc. At the end, they said “We didn’t take salary and credit score into consideration for this story.” WHAT?!? Those are the two things lending is based on. If blacks consistently have bad credit scores, why?? We know that 80% of black moms are single from census data and single income households are certainly going to qualify for less loans. They decided to leave that out of the story because it didn’t go with their “banks are racist” narrative. Their reporting is just a marketing arm for the democrat party. It’s not journalism.
 
NPR is garbage. I give it a fair try every now and then on the way home from work. They did a 20 minute piece in discrimination in home lending: Blacks get less loans, get turned down more, etc. At the end, they said “We didn’t take salary and credit score into consideration for this story.” WHAT?!? Those are the two things lending is based on. If blacks consistently have bad credit scores, why?? We know that 80% of black moms are single from census data and single income households are certainly going to qualify for less loans. They decided to leave that out of the story because it didn’t go with their “banks are racist” narrative. Their reporting is just a marketing arm for the democrat party. It’s not journalism.
:rolleyes:
 
NPR is garbage. I give it a fair try every now and then on the way home from work. They did a 20 minute piece in discrimination in home lending: Blacks get less loans, get turned down more, etc. At the end, they said “We didn’t take salary and credit score into consideration for this story.” WHAT?!? Those are the two things lending is based on. If blacks consistently have bad credit scores, why?? We know that 80% of black moms are single from census data and single income households are certainly going to qualify for less loans. They decided to leave that out of the story because it didn’t go with their “banks are racist” narrative. Their reporting is just a marketing arm for the democrat party. It’s not journalism.

Credit scores are what inspired the Chinese social credit system. Banks in partnership with the government absolutely used to have extremely racist lending policies which still affect things like education, salary, credit scores, etc. to this very day (because of generational impacts). What news source tells you that story? I bet NPR skipped all dat.
 
What a frickin' joke:

Is NPR “U.S. state-affiliated media”?
Twitter and its new owner, Elon Musk, seem to think so. Over NPR’s protests, Twitter placed that label on its account Tuesday night, implying that the Washington-based nonprofit news organization is somehow connected to, if not controlled by, the federal government.

The designation puts NPR, which has 8.8 million followers on the site, in the same category as propaganda outlets like the Russian-government-owned RT and the Chinese Communist Party’s People’s Daily newspaper. Both are also “state-affiliated media,” according to Twitter.

Notably, however, Twitter has not slapped that label on several media organizations that are substantially funded by government. The Voice of America, the BBC and the U.S. military newspaper Stars and Stripes, among others, continue on Twitter without being designated as “state-affiliated” — a phrase with strong connotations of compromised editorial independence.

NPR does rely on some government funding, both directly and indirectly through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, an agency set up by Congress decades ago to fund public radio and TV with taxpayers’ money. CPB is slated to receive $525 million in its next fiscal year — money that goes to PBS, NPR and hundreds of public TV and radio stations. Conservatives have tried for years to “zero out” these federal contributions.


ADVERTISING


From its founding in 1970, NPR has asserted that it is editorially independent of any government agency or funding source (NPR also receives revenue from advertising and donations).
It asked Twitter to remove the “state” designation late Tuesday when it first appeared. In a statement Wednesday, president and chief executive John Lansing said: “We were disturbed to see last night that Twitter has labeled NPR as ‘state-affiliated media.’ … NPR and our Member stations are supported by millions of listeners who depend on us for the independent, fact-based journalism we provide. NPR stands for freedom of speech and holding the powerful accountable. It is unacceptable for Twitter to label us this way.”
Aside from the unsavory suggestion that its reporting is tainted, a state-affiliated media organization faces practical consequences under Twitter’s rules. Twitter says it “will not recommend or amplify [such] accounts or their tweets,” a policy that could affect the account’s reach and that of its advertisers.



Twitter hasn’t explained why it placed the label on NPR, but its action appears to be consistent with Musk’s often arbitrary and punitive decisions regarding news-media accounts since buying the company last year for $44 billion.
It appears, however, to be inconsistent with Twitter’s own rules.
Twitter’s published rules define “state-affiliated media” as “outlets where the state exercises control over editorial content through financial resources, direct or indirect political pressures, and/or control over production and distribution.”
It added: “State-financed media organizations with editorial independence, like the BBC in the UK and NPR in the US, for example, are not defined as state-affiliated media for the purposes of this policy.”

But another version of the rules published Tuesday eliminated NPR from that sentence.



Musk has previously targeted news organizations and journalists; in December, he suspended the accounts of about a dozen journalists at The Washington Post, the New York Times, CNN and others for reporting on a controversial Twitter account that had tracked his jet travels, saying the journalists had provided “assassination coordinates” by reporting the story.
More recently, he began removing from some news organizations’ accounts the blue check marks that signal that their identities are verified. The news organizations have declined to pay Twitter for the previously free check mark. The New York Times, for example, is no longer checked; NPR is.
On Tuesday, Musk weighed in with a tweet about NPR’s new label. Over a tweet of a screenshot of Twitter’s rules about state affiliation, he wrote, “Seems accurate.”
Asked for further comment via email on Tuesday, Twitter’s press shop responded with the same automated response to every news-media request: a poop emoji.
Remind me what the p stands for…
 
If NPR isn't a federal government channel, what is it? It's almost like Alice in Wonderland for the left. Men can have babies, CO2 is air pollution and NPR isn't a government channel. Are we on Candid Camera?
LOL, just because it doesn't spouse fascist rhetoric which you support?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
People on twitter care about dumb shit. I assume if you rely on Twitter for your 'news' and daily outrage you're an idiot.
 
@Phenomenally Frantastic Thought I'd add more material context to this NPR dumb human story and see if I could get your thoughts after you're done with today's lesson in Elon apologetics and disseminating them widely.

Do you consider Chinese social credit system dystopian or authoritarian or similar? Did you know they took that idea from our credit scoring? Why do you consider it appropriate how we determine the prices at which people get to access credit from banks who are primarily borrowing from a central bank to make the loans? Think about it. If you're born into a poor family, it's more expensive for your family to access basically anything in society. You will attend a worse school because you live in a neighborhood that has poorly funded schools because all the district's residents are poor (at one point basically by design) and our schools get a giant portion of their funding from property taxes. Now poor kid is an adult and they have to pay more than many of their peers who are otherwise similar to them just to access debt from the jump. And you HAVE to go into debt to do basically anything in this country unless your wealthy family sets you up nice. Not really many ways to opt out of some level of debt especially now that they're criminalizing homelessness.

Do you wonder why NPR didn't get into any of that discussion? I certainly do. Or do you take for granted that American social credit system is definitely fair and not dystopian/authoritarian or similar? Sure seems like we just created a technocratic caste system with mostly purely theoretical class mobility. I suspect NPR left all that out because even though they may be liberal or at least code as Bezos liberal, they don't appear very left wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT