And Deuce listed as second string. Interesting.Padilla is starter. Let's Go Hawks!
Could be shutting him down for his shoulder issue.And Deuce listed as second string. Interesting.
Yeah this has been an issue. MN QB isn't good so hopefully it doesn't. Stop the run. Next 2 games..No Moss ??
If Padilla kicks ass it will be his going forward regardless but he needs to deliver.Hogan #2 which means Petras is either not dressing or working as the emergency QB. So safe to say this isn't a "benching of Petras", but a start for Padilla due to injury. Semantics, I know, but deliberate at the same time. All doors remain open.
that is going to get some buzzAnd Deuce listed as second string. Interesting.
Saving him for the bowl game…Could be shutting him down for his shoulder issue.
Or Roberts?? How much PT outside of special teams has Xavior Williams got?The prospect of no Richman worries me more than the prospect of no Moss.
What what do you mean by that.
Signed Roberto DuranNo Moss ??
Yes, the moment Padilla struggles, Hogan becomes the most popular man on the team.Does this make Hogan the new fan favorite and best QB on the team?
The 2 deeps at offensive tackle have been a concern every week.The 2 deeps at offensive tackles are a concern.
Yes, the moment Padilla struggles, Hogan becomes the most popular man on the team.
Has there even been any statements from the staff on how close he might be to coming back?No Moss ??
True.If Padilla kicks ass it will be his going forward regardless but he needs to deliver.
Has there even been any statements from the staff on how close he might be to coming back?
It’s very interesting, based on Kirks comments that Petras isn’t listed at all though. Either this is his way of naming Padilla the starter, and the injury gives Kirk a graceful way to bench him without actually benching him, or they looked at Spencer again and the injury is more severe than first thought. Presser tomorrow will be interesting.These depth charts are basically how the team ended last game. Rarely an indication of things to come.
To be fair, I’m not sure there’s more than twice in 22 years that we’ve legit had a qb controversy, online fan griping aside. jc in ‘08 and obviously rudolf/CJB. Otherwise, we’ve had fairly solie quarterback play and this hasn’t been the issue people like to think it has been.So I'm getting some of the same vibes from the responses here that has been my pet peeve about the way this staff looks at the qb position.
Let's not put Padilla on a pedestal and say that he's untouchable and that it's now his era and his team from here forward. He deserves a fair shot to run the team. But that doesn't have to mean sticking with the same old "starter for life" mentality.
What's wrong with a position that is something less extreme than the KF set of expectations that a starting qb shall be named and he will get all meaningful snaps barring injury, illness or otherwise unavailability?
There's some middle ground between a hair trigger for pulling a qb for any mistake and tenure for the duration of eligibility once named starter.
Yep - the calls for Deuce begin!
It means Spencer will start if he is able to start. Otherwise will not play.And Deuce listed as second string. Interesting.
Signed Roberto Duran
especially since KF was hopeful that Spencer would be back to near full strength this weekAnd Deuce listed as second string. Interesting.
No Moss ??