ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. had intelligence of detailed Ukrainian plan to attack Nord Stream pipeline

binsfeldcyhawk2

HR Legend
Gold Member
Oct 13, 2006
38,070
53,691
113
SIAP...


Three months before saboteurs bombed the Nord Stream natural gas pipeline, the Biden administration learned from a close ally that the Ukrainian military had planned a covert attack on the undersea network, using a small team of divers who reported directly to the commander in chief of the Ukrainian armed forces.

Details about the plan, which have not been previously reported, were collected by a European intelligence service and shared with the CIA in June 2022. They provide some of the most specific evidence to date linking the government of Ukraine to the eventual attack in the Baltic Sea, which U.S. and Western officials have called a brazen and dangerous act of sabotage on Europe’s energy infrastructure.
The European intelligence report was shared on the chat platform Discord, allegedly by Air National Guard member Jack Teixeira. The Washington Post obtained a copy from one of Teixeira’s online friends.

The intelligence report was based on information obtained from an individual in Ukraine. The source’s information could not immediately be corroborated, but the CIA shared the report with Germany and other European countries last June, according to multiple officials familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive intelligence operations and diplomatic discussions.

The highly specific details, which include numbers of operatives and methods of attack, show that for nearly a year, Western allies have had a basis to suspect Kyiv in the sabotage. That assessment has only strengthened in recent months as German law enforcement investigators uncovered evidence about the bombing that bears striking similarities to what the European service said Ukraine was planning.
Officials in multiple countries confirmed that the intelligence summary posted on Discord accurately stated what the European service told the CIA. The Post agreed to withhold the name of the European country as well as some aspects of the suspected plan at the request of government officials, who said exposing the information would threaten sources and operations.

 
Matches my comments at the time relative to how Ukraine would benefit by eliminating Nord Stream pipeline as a Putin trump card....
 
Maybe more people will want to vote in the poll now

 
Weren't you arguing recently that we did it?
From the very beginning, I made these points:

1. Hersh's account sounded plausible (we did it, maybe with Norwegian complicity). Mainly for profits.

2. Ukraine could have done it. Mainly to keep Europe (especially Germany) from getting weak-kneed.

3. Big Oil corporations could have done it. Again, for profits.

4. Other fossil fuel nations (Saudi Arabia, Iran, whoever) could have done it. Again, for profits.

5. Russia doing it was the least plausible of all the suggestion, but somehow was the most popular back then - especially, I'm embarrassed to say, among my fellow libs.

The thing about some of those possibilities is just how cynical (and criminal) they all are, except maybe #2. Ukraine at least has a reason most of us can understand and perhaps excuse.
 
From the very beginning, I made these points:

1. Hersh's account sounded plausible (we did it, maybe with Norwegian complicity). Mainly for profits.

2. Ukraine could have done it. Mainly to keep Europe (especially Germany) from getting weak-kneed.

3. Big Oil corporations could have done it. Again, for profits.

4. Other fossil fuel nations (Saudi Arabia, Iran, whoever) could have done it. Again, for profits.

5. Russia doing it was the least plausible of all the suggestion, but somehow was the most popular back then - especially, I'm embarrassed to say, among my fellow libs.

The thing about some of those possibilities is just how cynical (and criminal) they all are, except maybe #2. Ukraine at least has a reason most of us can understand and perhaps excuse.
And we still disagree on who were more likely to do it. We wouldn't do it because it would hurt our allies and make them less willing to continue supporting the effort. Which is exactly why the Russians were a valid candidate, seems like something Putin would think to do.
 
Between this and the dam, something is fishy.

dam-fish-graphic.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT