ADVERTISEMENT

Update: Back to Did Comrade Harris Did Lie about owning a Firearm?

Community notes for the win.



Community Note:

“This is due to an error in the captions. The official transcript states Kamala "does own a firearm."CNN

Transcript
https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/cnr/date/2024-09-20/segment/25#:~:text=She%20supports%20strong%20Responsible%20gun%20ownership%20and%20she%20does%20own%20a%20firearm

Video
https://grabien.com/file?id=2606814

Video with erroneous auto-caption
https://archive.org/details/CNNW_20240920_140000_CNN_Newsroom_With_Jim_Acosta/start/780/end/840
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: MeetTheFerentzes
Just want to document these.



Hey all you shitforbrains. Guess what?


a981c0d60d011588e45db537c6e1babb.gif


My bullshit detector is impeccable and my Wu-Tang style is unmatched. This woman is as phony as a three dollar bill.

 

Whoops? You posted about the same interview, and now you are grasping at does/does not?
You posted a tweet that states she owns a firearm; CNN says it is a handgun that fits in a purse (.380, maybe); what do you need to get to believe she does own a firearm?
 
He’ll be back to delete the thread at some point like he’s done to many others.
It’s possible he’s onto something that no other news outlet is reporting. Just Leading Report, known for misinformation and outright lying. But hey, wouldn’t be the first time PF fell for nonsense. Spiking the ball in several consecutive posts is a bold strategy though.
 
There is zero evidence she owns a gun other than her claims. Claims from a politician. A professional liar.

When her campaign rep was asked what kind of gun she owns, she could not answer.

It should be an easy question to answer.

You don’t find that a little odd?
The flailing, the flailing.

The failing.
 
We know she’s a hypocrite on this issue; is she also breaking the law and/or lying?

Self-proclaimed gun owner and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris revealed on 60 Minutes on Sunday that the gun she claims to own is a Glock and that she’s had it a long time.
“That was not the first time I’ve really talked about it,” she said, shaking her finger at host Bill Whitaker. “That’s not the first time I talked about it.”

The fact that the anti-gun presidential candidate might own any firearm as she continually tries to further restrict Second Amendment rights is sheer hypocrisy. But what is even more hypocritical is that she owns a Glock. Here’s why.

First, Glock pistols are semi-automatic—you know, they fire a round every time you pull the trigger. However, Kamala, her boss President Joe Biden and other anti-gun advocates like to fudge a little every now and then and say that semi-auto pistols are actually full-auto and can be used to “spray bullets.” Semi-auto rifles using the same mechanism are on their list to ban and confiscate.

But that’s not the only thing. Nearly every Glock model made is designed to accept those evil “high-capacity” magazines Harris and Biden are so keen on banning. If she really does own a Glock, I wonder if she’d like to reveal what the capacity of her magazine is.

Furthermore, what right does Kamala have to own a gun anyway. In court filings during the Heller case, Harris signed on to documents stating that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect an individual right, but only protects those who are in a militia. If she’s not in some militia that we haven’t heard about, she’s a doubly big hypocrite for owning a firearm.

Additionally, the Biden-Harris administration’s White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention recently collaborated with anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety and the City of Chicago to target Glock Inc. in a frivolous lawsuit alleging the company is responsible for the criminal misuse of firearms when criminals unlawfully attach an illegal device to Glock handguns to convert them to full-auto. In that situation, White House officials met privately with Glock representatives to demand a design alteration to their handguns—the very same kind of pistol the vice president claims to own.

Last but not least, let’s talk about California’s arguably illegal handgun roster. In California, citizens can only purchase handguns that have been certified by the state, and the number is dwindling year by year.

Interestingly, many Glock pistols are not on that handgun roster so thereby illegal for California residents to own. Gen 3 Glocks and below were grandfathered in as they were sold before the law was passed. But Gen 4 and 5 cannot be sold in the state. If she bought her alleged Glock new since 2009, it’s probably illegal for normal citizens of California to own. Unless, or course, she bought a Gen 3 or earlier at a gun show!

 
We know she’s a hypocrite on this issue; is she also breaking the law and/or lying?

Self-proclaimed gun owner and Democrat presidential nominee Kamala Harris revealed on 60 Minutes on Sunday that the gun she claims to own is a Glock and that she’s had it a long time.
“That was not the first time I’ve really talked about it,” she said, shaking her finger at host Bill Whitaker. “That’s not the first time I talked about it.”

The fact that the anti-gun presidential candidate might own any firearm as she continually tries to further restrict Second Amendment rights is sheer hypocrisy. But what is even more hypocritical is that she owns a Glock. Here’s why.

First, Glock pistols are semi-automatic—you know, they fire a round every time you pull the trigger. However, Kamala, her boss President Joe Biden and other anti-gun advocates like to fudge a little every now and then and say that semi-auto pistols are actually full-auto and can be used to “spray bullets.” Semi-auto rifles using the same mechanism are on their list to ban and confiscate.

But that’s not the only thing. Nearly every Glock model made is designed to accept those evil “high-capacity” magazines Harris and Biden are so keen on banning. If she really does own a Glock, I wonder if she’d like to reveal what the capacity of her magazine is.

Furthermore, what right does Kamala have to own a gun anyway. In court filings during the Heller case, Harris signed on to documents stating that the Second Amendment doesn’t protect an individual right, but only protects those who are in a militia. If she’s not in some militia that we haven’t heard about, she’s a doubly big hypocrite for owning a firearm.

Additionally, the Biden-Harris administration’s White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention recently collaborated with anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety and the City of Chicago to target Glock Inc. in a frivolous lawsuit alleging the company is responsible for the criminal misuse of firearms when criminals unlawfully attach an illegal device to Glock handguns to convert them to full-auto. In that situation, White House officials met privately with Glock representatives to demand a design alteration to their handguns—the very same kind of pistol the vice president claims to own.

Last but not least, let’s talk about California’s arguably illegal handgun roster. In California, citizens can only purchase handguns that have been certified by the state, and the number is dwindling year by year.


Interestingly, many Glock pistols are not on that handgun roster so thereby illegal for California residents to own. Gen 3 Glocks and below were grandfathered in as they were sold before the law was passed. But Gen 4 and 5 cannot be sold in the state. If she bought her alleged Glock new since 2009, it’s probably illegal for normal citizens of California to own. Unless, or course, she bought a Gen 3 or earlier at a gun show!

The truth about guns.com? 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
OP, there's no evidence I own a gun. There's no evidence I don't.

I've been to quite a few ranges, and I doubt there's any evidence I was there before 2020.

She was a prosecutor in CA, so it's plausible she owns a gun, or owned a gun at that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Why does Kamala own a gun that would banned under the Assault Weapons Ban of 2022?


Handguns can be “Assault Weapons”
Under Section 36 (D), a semiautomatic pistol is considered a “semiautomatic assault weapon’ if the magazine is not fixed and has one of the following attributes:

1.A threaded barrel
2.A second pistol grip
3.A barrel shroud
4. The capacity to accept a detachable magazine at some location outside of the pistol grip
5. A semiautomatic version of an automatic firearm
6.A manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when unloaded
7. A stabilizing brace or similar component

While many more handguns are coming standard with a threaded barrel due to the proliferation of suppressors and other accessories in American citizens’ hands, ban category (5) is the most concerning.

Many semiautomatic firearms, including handguns, have fully automatic counterparts.

How the Glock Family is Banned

The Glock 19, one of the most popular handguns in America today, is a “semiautomatic version” of the Glock 18. The Glock 18 is a handgun equipped with a select-fire switch, allowing it to be fired automatically. Therefore, all firearms within the Glock family could be considered “semiautomatic versions” of the Glock 18, an automatic firearm. The language does not state the specifics of what a “version” is or whether the chronological order of a firearms development history applies.

By this same logic, a plethora of other firearm lines would also be banned under this section of the bill. Examples include the CZ75 line,3 the Berretta 90 Series,4 all derivatives of the 1911 family,5 and many other handguns not specifically mentioned here.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BelemNole
You need an assault rifle to self defend?
The article was specific to a glock.


As someone who has a home that's very spread out, with zero fear of over pentration, yes, ARs are part of my home defense structure.


"Pistols put holes in people, rifles put holes through people, shotguns, at an effective range with the appropriate load with physically remove a chunk of your opponent and throw the chunk of shit on the ground"

- the goat
 
The article was specific to a glock.


As someone who has a home that's very spread out, with zero fear of over pentration, yes, ARs are part of my home defense structure.


"Pistols put holes in people, rifles put holes through people, shotguns, at an effective range with the appropriate load with physically remove a chunk of your opponent and throw the chunk of shit on the ground"

- the goat
So, then did you miss the part where I said I don’t give a crap about the handgun? Will a Glock kill 19 kids in a matter of minutes while the Governor runs off to play at a fundraiser?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT