Honestly, other than people who are hyper sensitive to what talking heads say about our weak schedule (while said talking heads simultaneously ignore that we play more P5 teams than most of the teams those talking heads love), we do not need ISU to be a good win, nor do we want them to be a good team/program. The worst thing that could happen to Iowa (other than hiring a horrible coach) is for ISU to become any sort of a football power. I can't believe this has to be explained over and over again.
We are not a big enough name to get into the playoffs with 1 or more wins (unless we're the only 1 loss team). The committee will take a two loss blue blood over us nearly every time. Strength of schedule simply isn't an issue (see 2015, where we would have been in with what was probably the weakest possible schedule we could have). Again, I don't understand why people don't get this.
As far as
@101st Abn Hawk 's comment, the dream of ISU being a power, but magically losing to Iowa every year is not going to happen. The better ISU is, the harder it is for us to recruit against them and the worse Iowa will be. It's the highlander...there can be only one. The options are:
powerful ISU/bad Iowa
powerful Iowa/bad ISU
mediocre for both
It's not hard to figure out which one Iowa fans want.
This was the one single time Pollard was right. For ISU to have sustained success, then need Iowa to suck. Two powers from the same tiny population state isn't going to happen. Heck, one power from this state is highly unlikely.
What we want is ISU to be horrible and Iowa to beat them like a drum year in and year out (like the Fry years). Even better: a conference realignment that drops them down to a lessor conference or division.