Was the left mad at Jimmy Carter when he actually did what Trump is talking about?

[SoMplsHawkI]

WOB! WOB! WOB!

Didja read the 5th and 25th posts in this thread?

 

[naturalmwa]

Oh God...Trump would be much much worse.

My point is that all of those saying "This isn't what America is all about" when not wanting to take in Syrian refugees and with the shit Trump is saying (a country in which we are currently engaged in a war with), but are perfectly fine with what Jimmeh did. Suddenly, the " Statue of Liberty is for everyone" shit went out the window when a lib does it. I didn't know it would but this thread has proven the hypocrisy.

Do you honestly not see a differance? I mean to troll is one thing, but if after having it called out you still think you're right is sort of pitiful.

 

[iammrhawkeyes]

Didja read the 5th and 25th posts in this thread?

lol. On porpoise my good man. Scotty is a smart one though.

 

[dbq hawk 32]

Going after a nation state seems fundamentally different then going after a religion. You should feel bad for even trying to sell this to the wise HROT readership. Sell that on some Florida forum.

Haven't read the thread... take a look at who/what is a protected class.

 

[naturalmwa]

Haven't read the thread... take a look at who/what is a protected class.

Are you making the argument that foreign guests are protected by the national origin class? I bet that's not a sound legal argument.

 

[aflachawk]

Oh come on, I even complimented you. You can't think these actions are similar in motivation, tone or scope.

As a con, I have to agree with natural. To me these examples are very dissimilar.

 

[Speedway1]

Oh God...Trump would be much much worse.

My point is that all of those saying "This isn't what America is all about" when not wanting to take in Syrian refugees and with the shit Trump is saying (a country in which we are currently engaged in a war with), but are perfectly fine with what Jimmeh did. Suddenly, the " Statue of Liberty is for everyone" shit went out the window when a lib does it. I didn't know it would but this thread has proven the hypocrisy.

Trump cannot possibly be worse than Hillary. Hillary is more of Obama. A disaster. Just ask Col.Ralph Peters! LOL

 

[naturalmwa]

Trump cannot possibly be worse than Hillary. Hillary is more of Obama. A disaster. Just ask Col.Ralph Peters! LOL

Hill might be a lot like BHO on domestic issues, but she is more like Bush Jr on foreign policy. If you don't like Hill because of what the military Col thinks of Obama, that's hardly applicable. Now if you don't like Hill because you don't like neocons, that makes a lot of sense, but your sort of stuck with Paul and Sanders as the only alternatives.

 

[unIowa]

Hill might be a lot like BHO on domestic issues, but she is more like Bush Jr on foreign policy. If you don't like Hill because of what the military Col thinks of Obama, that's hardly applicable. Now if you don't like Hill because you don't like neocons, that makes a lot of sense, but your sort of stuck with Paul and Sanders as the only alternatives.

Superior alternatives if you believe in individual liberties.

 

[THE_DEVIL]

However, Carter explicitly stated in his speech that visas would be issued to Iranians only “for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or where the national interest of our own country requires.” In addition, the Carter administration did not purpose-build camps for exterminating Iranians, nor did they make them wear demoralizing identification badges. Moreover, although prejudice against Iranians developed in the U.S. during the hostage crisis lasting between 1979 and 1981, during those years the U.S. took in nearly 30,000 immigrants from Iran with over 10,000 arriving in 1980 alone. Therefore, by no means do Carter’s sanctions against Iran resemble the policies of Adolf Hitler.