Kinda surprised the Hawks gained 4 spots in the AP, since "it was only Illinois St".
Rank | Team | Record | PTS | 1st | Prev | Chg | Hi/Lo |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Georgia | 1-0 | 1371 | 51 | 1 | - | 1/1 |
2 | Ohio State | 1-0 | 1316 | 3 | 2 | - | 2/2 |
3 | Texas | 1-0 | 1245 | 1 | 4 | +1 | 3/4 |
4 | Alabama | 1-0 | 1172 | 0 | 5 | +1 | 4/5 |
5 | Ole Miss | 1-0 | 1081 | 0 | 6 | +1 | 5/6 |
6 | Oregon | 1-0 | 1080 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 3/6 |
7 | Notre Dame | 1-0 | 1079 | 0 | 7 | - | 7/7 |
8 | Penn State | 1-0 | 987 | 0 | 9 | +1 | 8/9 |
9 | Michigan | 1-0 | 919 | 0 | 8 | -1 | 8/9 |
10 | Missouri | 1-0 | 848 | 0 | 11 | +1 | 10/11 |
11 | Utah | 1-0 | 779 | 0 | 13 | +2 | 11/13 |
12 | Tennessee | 1-0 | 753 | 0 | 15 | +3 | 12/15 |
13 | Oklahoma | 1-0 | 705 | 0 | 16 | +3 | 13/16 |
14 | USC | 1-0 | 655 | 0 | 23 | +9 | 14/23 |
15 | Miami (FL) | 1-0 | 650 | 0 | 19 | +4 | 15/19 |
16 | Kansas State | 1-0 | 537 | 0 | 17 | +1 | 16/17 |
17 | Oklahoma State | 1-0 | 499 | 0 | 18 | +1 | 17/18 |
18 | Arizona | 1-0 | 348 | 0 | 21 | +3 | 18/21 |
19 | LSU | 0-1 | 341 | 0 | 12 | -7 | 12/19 |
20 | Kansas | 1-0 | 295 | 0 | 24 | +4 | 20/24 |
21 | Iowa | 1-0 | 260 | 0 | 25 | +4 | 21/25 |
22 | Clemson | 0-1 | 223 | 0 | 14 | -8 | 14/22 |
23 | North Carolina State | 1-0 | 154 | 0 | 22 | -1 | 22/23 |
24 | Louisville | 1-0 | 101 | 0 | NR | +3 | 24/NR |
25 | Washington | 1-0 | 95 | 0 | NR | +1 | 25/NR |
Looks like Illinois St moved up to #22 after keeping it within 40 to Iowa.
Crazy that both Florida and Florida State are totally out.Don't know if I've ever seen a team (Florida St.) Ranked in top 10 one week and the next not even in the others receiving votes.
Michigan probably gonna get exposed.Michigan still overrated. Texas/Michigan next week will be interesting
Michigan is basically Iowa with somewhat better resources.Michigan probably gonna get exposed.
That is assuming Sullivan would be better than Cade in our offense.Michigan is basically Iowa with somewhat better resources.
Can't help but wonder if McNamara is kicking himself for leaving Ann Arbor. Odds are, he'd probably be starting in Ann Arbor (and Sully would be starting in Iowa City. A win-win).
It takes 2 straight opening season losses to unranked teams including a shellacking at home to Boston College to accomplish that rare feat.Don't know if I've ever seen a team (Florida St.) Ranked in top 10 one week and the next not even in the others receiving votes.
Really? Why would Cade be kicking himself? Michigan screwed him and All over and were not going to give medical clearance to either because they went out and got second opinions and had their surgeries against the M doctors advice. He was probably never going to play at Michigan again.Michigan is basically Iowa with somewhat better resources.
Can't help but wonder if McNamara is kicking himself for leaving Ann Arbor. Odds are, he'd probably be starting in Ann Arbor (and Sully would be starting in Iowa City. A win-win).
Most of the time, it's a case of who lost ahead of you and you just naturally move up. In this case, FSU, TA&M, and Clemson all lost ahead of us, so we move up those 3 spots, plus NC St didn't look all that great against Western Carolina.Kinda surprised the Hawks gained 4 spots in the AP, since "it was only Illinois St".
40-zip against a pretty solid FCS team and Fla St losing 2 games totally opened up one of those 4 spots.Kinda surprised the Hawks gained 4 spots in the AP, since "it was only Illinois St".
To be clear, that image at #22 isn't ISU.
Michigan is the all time winningest program in college football... a little more than Iowa with "somewhat better resources"Michigan is basically Iowa with somewhat better resources.
Can't help but wonder if McNamara is kicking himself for leaving Ann Arbor. Odds are, he'd probably be starting in Ann Arbor (and Sully would be starting in Iowa City. A win-win).
That really is hard to do.Don't know if I've ever seen a team (Florida St.) Ranked in top 10 one week and the next not even in the others receiving votes.
Yeah no kidding, that's unbelievable reallyDon't know if I've ever seen a team (Florida St.) Ranked in top 10 one week and the next not even in the others receiving votes.
Required a unique set of circumstances:That really is hard to do.
Florida St has certainly "earned" that distinction. They are loaded with talent and look absolutely horrible.Don't know if I've ever seen a team (Florida St.) Ranked in top 10 one week and the next not even in the others receiving votes.
Sounds like a golden opportunity for someone we know...Florida St has certainly "earned" that distinction. They are loaded with talent and look absolutely horrible.
Where do you think you are? This is Iowa where the backup QB is always better than the starter.That is assuming Sullivan would be better than Cade in our offense.
WE dont know ISU light was a solid FCS team.40-zip against a pretty solid FCS team and Fla St losing 2 games totally opened up one of those 4 spots.
Right. First week games can be pretty deceiving. Everyone was talking about how good Georgia Tech looked after beating FSU in Ireland, and now everyone knows that all they did was struggle to beat a shitty FSU team that got boat raced by Boston College at home this week.WE dont know ISU light was a solid FCS team.
Built a great deal by Bo who let his son get molested by the team doc and kept that covered up. Just google it as Bo's son says it all happened.Michigan is the all time winningest program in college football... a little more than Iowa with "somewhat better resources"