What happened?
An MOU is not a contract. I doubt UT would owe him anything.
That would be hilarious if it happened but I bet they'll negotiate it down. They'll owe him something.
Please let this be true. It's exactly what should happen when you kow to the idiots of the world. Set the program back another decade which is outstanding.
Why did both parties sign it then? Just for fun? They will be writing a check.
FWIW:
"A memorandum of understanding (MoU) is an agreement between two (bilateral) or more (multilateral) parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action. It is often used in cases where parties either do not imply a legal commitment or in situations where the parties cannot create a legally enforceable agreement. It is a more formal alternative to a gentlemen's agreement.
Whether a document constitutes a binding contract depends only on the presence or absence of well-defined legal elements in the text proper of the document (the so-called "four corners"). The required elements are: offer and acceptance, consideration, and the intention to be legally bound (animus contrahendi). In the U.S., the specifics can differ slightly depending on whether the contract is for goods (falls under the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC]) or services (falls under the common law of the state)"..
Wait, Oh St fans have no problem with this guy representing their school?
Wait, Oh St fans have no problem with this guy representing their school?
Where is Jeff Brohm in these coaching searches. The guy is a great coach
This is a dumpster fire of epic proportions. The AD will lose his job
Dan Wetzel investigated Ped State and claims there is zero proof of Schiano knowing, he left there in 1995, fifteen years before the scandal came to light:
I look at this as Tennessee fans being p*ssed off they hired an underaccomplished, jerk-wad retread coach, and they used a loose association with the Sandusky scandal to fuel their anger and become their battle cry. True mob mentality and court of public opinion.
15 years before the scandal broke publicly, but the allegations go back to the 70s. I would say a coach getting away with that for that long is indicative of institutional acquiescence. He and the other coaches knew. They just put their heads in the sand to avoid responsibility. Not that type of character I'd want in a coach.