Top 12.
That really needs to be the bar. Everything else will be anywhere from "We did ok to we stunk it up and everything in between".
Top 12 SHOULD be our Team and Coaching staff goal.....every year.
Top 12.
That really needs to be the bar. Everything else will be anywhere from "We did ok to we stunk it up and everything in between".
Top 12 SHOULD be our Team and Coaching staff goal.....every year.
I would like to see 65th or 66th. That is middle of the pack average and really should be the floor.An offense that ranks 70 out of 133. Reminder...Iowa was 133 last year for total yards. Wisconsin was ranked 70.
Due to Cade's rehab, I am looking forward to everyone on this board losing their minds when Deacon is the starter in spring ball.
Or get a bye right?!? 😊The goal is CFP and on top of that is to host a CFP game in Kinnick.
The schedule sets up for 10 wins for sure. However, that won't guarantee them a playoff berth, especially if the losses are as horrific as last season (93-0 vs the only decent teams on the schedule). KF has got to go hands-free on the offense and not drag them into these play-not-to-lose games. I heard the new OC talk about schemes getting WR's open, but I think it's a basic lack of athleticism. It's hard to beat incredibly athletic DBs from Ohio State, Michigan and now we're adding in USC and an improved Nebraska haul from the portal. AGain, it's not about the Xs and Os, it's about the Jimmys and Joes. Iowa doesn't have enough of the latter.For me I'd like to see a floor of 8 wins. I see on the schedule a potential for 9 or 10 but I'm tampering down my expectations given the new O system. Of course it needs to actually be a new system and not a watered down KF style of offense.
My next big thing is get back to the pre-Brian days of being competitive in tough/big games. I'm over the offensive sh!tshows of blowouts and games being over by halftime.
WBY?
We are like 5th or something at putting guys into the NFL. We have the talent.The schedule sets up for 10 wins for sure. However, that won't guarantee them a playoff berth, especially if the losses are as horrific as last season (93-0 vs the only decent teams on the schedule). KF has got to go hands-free on the offense and not drag them into these play-not-to-lose games. I heard the new OC talk about schemes getting WR's open, but I think it's a basic lack of athleticism. It's hard to beat incredibly athletic DBs from Ohio State, Michigan and now we're adding in USC and an improved Nebraska haul from the portal. AGain, it's not about the Xs and Os, it's about the Jimmys and Joes. Iowa doesn't have enough of the latter.
close to 3 bills...Due to Cade's rehab, I am looking forward to everyone on this board losing their minds when Deacon is the starter in spring ball.
I agree to extent on talent but OC's worth a damn can scheme inferior talent open. Even our Defense will give up some 3 & Longs against Utah St or similar teams to open receivers, then on replay you just see it was a well designed play.The schedule sets up for 10 wins for sure. However, that won't guarantee them a playoff berth, especially if the losses are as horrific as last season (93-0 vs the only decent teams on the schedule). KF has got to go hands-free on the offense and not drag them into these play-not-to-lose games. I heard the new OC talk about schemes getting WR's open, but I think it's a basic lack of athleticism. It's hard to beat incredibly athletic DBs from Ohio State, Michigan and now we're adding in USC and an improved Nebraska haul from the portal. AGain, it's not about the Xs and Os, it's about the Jimmys and Joes. Iowa doesn't have enough of the latter.
Some of you guys keep saying that, but ignore how much CFB has changed over the past two decades. Does Iowa put guys in the NFL? Yes, lineman, tight ends, linebackers, punters. Not the kind of talent that wins in today's college football. So you can hang your hat on # of guys in the NFL as you get outscored 93-0 vs talent-laden teams, or you can pull your head out of your ass and understand that 35 players like Josey Jewel, a 1960s style of play and an overmatched coaching staff does not result in success at the college level. Now that the divisions are gone, Iowa is toast.We are like 5th or something at putting guys into the NFL. We have the talent.
Offense scores 35 pts per game. Defense scores 14 pts per game. Punter averages 50.1 yds with 6 second hang time. Receivers average 100 yds per game per game. Hawks win Big ten.For me I'd like to see a floor of 8 wins. I see on the schedule a potential for 9 or 10 but I'm tampering down my expectations given the new O system. Of course it needs to actually be a new system and not a watered down KF style of offense.
My next big thing is get back to the pre-Brian days of being competitive in tough/big games. I'm over the offensive sh!tshows of blowouts and games being over by halftime.
WBY?
So Te's, OL and nobody is arguing we have talent at the RB position. So what you are saying is basically over half our offense is talented if not more so then many other teams? I think most understand that when we have a Stanzi or Beathard at QB we do better. so getting some consistent talent at that position would help. We had a wr that went to a lesser B10 school and did well, so it is hard to say if we have talent there or not. AGAIN, I do not think it is a talent issue. Sure some years we might lack a little here and there, but not nearly to the extent some would like to make it out to be. My biggest one is OL, and I do not know if it is talent or something else, but the tradition of a really strong OL seems to be almost a forgotten memory these days. I mean how many of these guys, not including Proctor, would be drafted with intention and not as a late rounder?Some of you guys keep saying that, but ignore how much CFB has changed over the past two decades. Does Iowa put guys in the NFL? Yes, lineman, tight ends, linebackers, punters. Not the kind of talent that wins in today's college football. So you can hang your hat on # of guys in the NFL as you get outscored 93-0 vs talent-laden teams, or you can pull your head out of your ass and understand that 35 players like Josey Jewel, a 1960s style of play and an overmatched coaching staff does not result in success at the college level. Now that the divisions are gone, Iowa is toast.
Some of you guys keep saying that, but ignore how much CFB has changed over the past two decades. Does Iowa put guys in the NFL? Yes, lineman, tight ends, linebackers, punters. Not the kind of talent that wins in today's college football. So you can hang your hat on # of guys in the NFL as you get outscored 93-0 vs talent-laden teams, or you can pull your head out of your ass and understand that 35 players like Josey Jewel, a 1960s style of play and an overmatched coaching staff does not result in success at the college level. Now that the divisions are gone, Iowa is toast.
Setting the bar pretty highBeating Nebraska and Minnesota. An offense that looks more purposeful and dangerous. Emergence of some young studs on the defense.
I’m with you on QB and WR depth, but actually like Iowa’s running back room.Lack of QB, WR and RB is alarming.
Need an offensive scheme that actually works.
We lack talent at the skill positions. QB, WR, and our RB to lesser degree. Someone like Johnson is a big play threat but you have to give him 20-25 touches. He’ll have a few no gainers, then it’s one cut and gone. But we treat our RB rotation so odd. No rhyme or reason. Tho we switched from the 2008-2013 years where we beat the crap out of one RB and no one else would come in.So Te's, OL and nobody is arguing we have talent at the RB position. So what you are saying is basically over half our offense is talented if not more so then many other teams? I think most understand that when we have a Stanzi or Beathard at QB we do better. so getting some consistent talent at that position would help. We had a wr that went to a lesser B10 school and did well, so it is hard to say if we have talent there or not. AGAIN, I do not think it is a talent issue. Sure some years we might lack a little here and there, but not nearly to the extent some would like to make it out to be. My biggest one is OL, and I do not know if it is talent or something else, but the tradition of a really strong OL seems to be almost a forgotten memory these days. I mean how many of these guys, not including Proctor, would be drafted with intention and not as a late rounder?
KF's offensive scheme is based in fear. He cares more about avoiding mistakes than about making plays. It works fine as a way to win close, low-scoring games against crappy B1G West teams. Then we get in vs. teams that are actually good, and we get prison raped.We lack talent at the skill positions. QB, WR, and our RB to lesser degree. Someone like Johnson is a big play threat but you have to give him 20-25 touches. He’ll have a few no gainers, then it’s one cut and gone. But we treat our RB rotation so odd. No rhyme or reason. Tho we switched from the 2008-2013 years where we beat the crap out of one RB and no one else would come in.
Overall it’s a scheme issue. When you see someone like La Porta go into the NFL and catch more TD in one season than all of his Iowa career combined….
We never threw the ball past the goal line. We always throw behind and hope the players can break thru. Or we run / sneak the ball once we get within the red zone.
Brandon Smith was another huge target that we never used appropriately
And a win for their wifeIf the usual whiners would tape the games and only watch the games we win. A win win for them and this board
I’m with you on QB and WR depth, but actually like Iowa’s running back room.
Beat anyone elite that you aren't supposed to beat.So now the division are gone. To get into the B1G Championship game you have to finish in the Top 2.
Now there are 12 playoff teams. Even though it might be possible, I don't see the 4th place team in the B1G making the playoffs.
I don't think the Hawks will finish in the top 4, and I certainly don't think they will finish in the top 2. So I think a "playoff or bust" attitude is going to leave a lot of fans unhappy.
Playoffs - extremely happy
9 wins and win the trophy games - very happy
8 wins and win the trophy games - uh, happy I guess
You must be an oldy too. "tape"If the usual whiners would tape the games and only watch the games we win. A win win for them and this board