Lol @Whiskeydeltadeltatango wants so badly for the shooter to be some crazy leftist and he's very disappointed. Sorry the attempted assassination of your hero isn't turning out the way you wanted. Maybe next time!
Where are you getting that?Lol @Whiskeydeltadeltatango wants so badly for the shooter to be some crazy leftist and he's very disappointed. Sorry the attempted assassination of your hero isn't turning out the way you wanted. Maybe next time!
From reading your postsWhere are you getting that?
Then I would encourage you to consider your biases on my post. You'll find nothing remotely close proven with actual statements made by me..From reading your posts
jo biden is a walking clusterphuck........Try again. Seems that there are 3 possible explanations. Which is it?
Explain to me how my bias is clouding my judgment of your first sentence of your first post in this thread? You're clearly saying the Democrats rhetoric led to this shooting in your opinion (not excusing it myself, but there's been no evidence of this). How about other threads, where you continue to ignore the fact that he was a registered Republican (oh I know, it was to vote in the primaries even though he registered prior to the midterms), or that his classmates classified him as a conservative, or his neighbors saying they saw Trump signs in their yard.Then I would encourage you to consider your biases on my post. You'll find nothing remotely close proven with actual statements made by me..
Shooting the crowd meant he wanted to kill people shooting the singer meant he didn't like country music. Make sense?Explain to me how my bias is clouding my judgment of your first sentence of your first post in this thread? You're clearly saying the Democrats rhetoric led to this shooting in your opinion (not excusing it myself, but there's been no evidence of this). How about other threads, where you continue to ignore the fact that he was a registered Republican (oh I know, it was to vote in the primaries even though he registered prior to the midterms), or that his classmates classified him as a conservative, or his neighbors saying they saw Trump signs in their yard.
You said it has to be political because his target was Trump. Was Paddock's shooting anti-country music because he shot up a concert? Sometimes loner gunman just want to be known in history, and shooting Trump would certainly make your name known. Again, we still don't know everything, but it's funny to see what you focus on and what you choose to ignore. All while having the audacity to tell others to check their biases.
So easy.Then I would encourage you to consider your biases on my post. You'll find nothing remotely close proven with actual statements made by me..
There was a failed assassination attempt on a former President and the leading candidate to be the next president from a person representing a group the democrats refuse to admit exist and you are going to continue to double down on the cult thing....
I'm serious when I say this, I like your shit posting enough to want to see you stay around after the embarrassment, log off. You are not thinking clearly.
Does Antifa exist?
So I presume Reagan's assassination attempt was politically motivated in your mind as well. It must have been, because all shooting attempts are a statement against what that person stands for according to you. There's no other alternative.Shooting the crowd meant he wanted to kill people shooting the singer meant he didn't like country music. Make sense?
And no, it doesn't make sense. Like most of your posts.Shooting the crowd meant he wanted to kill people shooting the singer meant he didn't like country music. Make sense?
It's my understanding that the shooter was registered as a republican but never voted as one, but donated to a democrat PAC.Explain to me how my bias is clouding my judgment of your first sentence of your first post in this thread? You're clearly saying the Democrats rhetoric led to this shooting in your opinion (not excusing it myself, but there's been no evidence of this). How about other threads, where you continue to ignore the fact that he was a registered Republican (oh I know, it was to vote in the primaries even though he registered prior to the midterms), or that his classmates classified him as a conservative, or his neighbors saying they saw Trump signs in their yard.
You said it has to be political because his target was Trump. Was Paddock's shooting anti-country music because he shot up a concert? Sometimes loner gunman just want to be known in history, and shooting Trump would certainly make your name known. Again, we still don't know everything, but it's funny to see what you focus on and what you choose to ignore. All while having the audacity to tell others to check their biases.
Riley what is it that you think you are attempting to accomplish there? The first one was for the teacher that was losing his shit and wished the guy wouldn't have missed and the 2nd was a generic question.So easy.
Alright, well, you just keep making up whatever make sense in your head.And no, it doesn't make sense. Like most of your posts.
There are also reports that someone else with that name made the donation.It's my understanding that the shooter was registered as a republican but never voted as one, but donated to a democrat PAC.
It's one of the compelling details like the SS choosing not be on that particular roof or not even secure the access to it. Supposedly he's also the only 20 year-old in the modern world with no social media footprint.
The longer this goes without more concrete information the more stupid conspiracy theories are going to arise.
And you just keep ignoring replies that expose your dumb logicAlright, well, you just keep making up whatever make sense in your head.
The first one was your stumbling, mumbling reference to Antifa being behind this as was your second one.Riley what is it that you think you are attempting to accomplish there? The first one was for the teacher that was losing his shit and wished the guy wouldn't have missed and the 2nd was a generic question.
Do you actually have a target eith this one?
That's all good and fine, we don't know a ton about this kid. I'm just pointing out that even though a politically motivated assassination attempt would be the worst result for the country, we have people like Whiskey clearly rooting for that result so he can score some points on HROT. He's pathetic.It's my understanding that the shooter was registered as a republican but never voted as one, but donated to a democrat PAC.
It's one of the compelling details like the SS choosing not be on that particular roof or not even secure the access to it. Supposedly he's also the only 20 year-old in the modern world with no social media footprint.
The longer this goes without more concrete information the more stupid conspiracy theories are going to arise.
Maybe you quoted the wrong post?The first one was your stumbling, mumbling reference to Antifa being behind this as was your second one.
You also claimed several times that there were others trying to shoot Trump, but that's different misinformation you spewed.
For an excellent dissection of the fog of war, read my brother in laws book Meade at Gettysburg.The ‘fog of war’ is referring to the confusion that arises from what the person in charge can’t see everything with their own eyes. So they’re relying on second hand information and information delayed by various degrees in order to put together their total picture of right now.
There was a great little civil war game I played years ago, similar in format to the Ultimate General series of games. They introduced a cool mechanic where your orders wouldn’t be instantly transmitted. If you told a brigade to reposition a rider left the general and raced toward the brigade to relay the order. If you changed your mind about where that brigade should deploy and sent a countermanding order you’d have to wait for that rider to get to them and relay the change, likely while they’re already conducting the initial maneuver.
Never seen another game introduce an OODA Loop like it, but it was really cool in how it affected your decision making (and timeliness!).
The egregious oversights should be enough to get the person in charge fired. Their incompetence is literally fatal for others.
They're your quotes.Maybe you quoted the wrong post?
So, we're up to 11% each in the "planned event" camps.
Where did I throw out a challenge Riley?They're your quotes.
This is one of the most amusing moves you try - you throw out a challenge and then, when confronted on it, wonder what it's about. If you weren't so stupid I would think it's intentional.
🤡 showMy vote was security was incompetent:
, major issues every time a new video is released ( I just saw this one may have been posted elsewhere) it just gets worse and worse
There was no plan to open the gate in case of an emergency
JFC. Not even an hour ago.Where did I throw out a challenge Riley?
Lol @Whiskeydeltadeltatango wants so badly for the shooter to be some crazy leftist and he's very disappointed. Sorry the attempted assassination of your hero isn't turning out the way you wanted. Maybe next time!
Where are you getting that?
From reading your posts
Then I would encourage you to consider your biases on my post. You'll find nothing remotely close proven with actual statements made by me..
Read it again Riley. There is no challenge there. I'm telling him his beliefs are not verified by my words.JFC. Not even an hour ago.
So easy.
No.
Biden's use of the term, "Bullseye" was in reference to all the negative attention he'd received for his poor debate performance. Which was terrible, and for what it's worth he deserved the negative attention. But his use of the word bullseye was referring to how he wanted the media to turn their attention to trump. If you go back and review it, you should be able to decipher that. He didn't literally mean let's point a sniper riffle with a scope/bullseye at trump and shoot him. But you're saying (above) that that is exactly what he meant.
And by the way, Biden has since admitted it was a mistake to use that word. Show me where trump admitted a single mistake for anything. Ever.
Just what I was thinking...Probably a few people joking, but I think you’re otherwise seeing the edge of the bell curve on either end there.
Except that they clearly are - you suggested Antifa was behind the assassination attempt in the quotes I shared.Read it again Riley. There is no challenge there. I'm telling him his beliefs are not verified by my words.
and that Riley is how easy it is to fu.ck with you..........
Who lives a better life Riley, the elephant who eats what he wants and occasionally goes hingey because he made a bad choice, or the parasite that picks through his shit trying to find things the elephant missed?
If you're referring to me, perhaps you should keep reading. We came to an understanding.Dude, he's all-in on the cult
Starting to like this a iran angle. It explains a lot
I can't speak for Whiskey, but perhaps maybe the reason he and others are rooting for a political motive, is because he and others have been labeled MAGA extremists, nazis, racists, insurrectionists, traitors, bigots, among other things simply because they thought Trump did a good job, believe in state's rights, girls don't have a penis, limited federal government, secured borders, and wanting the needs of Americans to come before the needs of the world. They like their gas powered engines and steak and baked potato.That's all good and fine, we don't know a ton about this kid. I'm just pointing out that even though a politically motivated assassination attempt would be the worst result for the country, we have people like Whiskey clearly rooting for that result so he can score some points on HROT. He's pathetic.
That’s ultra deep BS.He’d have to be your patsy, with the real shooter on another vantage point taking the ‘real’ shot during the confusion.
I’m just going to say that’s completely nutty.Now they're saying Iran had a hit on Trump. So if that's the case maybe that might explain things. They recruit this kid they pay him.... or her. They contact him covertly. No record of it on the interwebs
That’s my point.That’s ultra deep BS.