ADVERTISEMENT

What Mike Johnson had to say in his first national TV interview as speaker

cigaretteman

HR King
May 29, 2001
77,442
58,937
113
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) gave his first national television interview since winning the speaker’s gavel, sitting down for an hour with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.
During the interview, which aired Thursday night, the newly minted speaker, offered his views on a wide range of issues, including the latest mass shootings in Maine. Johnson, who previously was a lesser-known conservative, also addressed his first major challenge: ensuring the government is funded before a looming Nov. 17 deadline.


Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

Here are some highlights of what Johnson said he believes.

1. Guns are not the problem in mass shootings​

Johnson opened his interview by offering condolences to the victims of the mass shooting Wednesday night in Lewiston, Maine, which killed at least 18 people and led to a massive manhunt for the suspected gunman.



“The end of the day, it’s — the problem is the human heart,” Johnson said. “It’s not guns, it’s not the weapons. At the end of the day, we have to protect the right of the citizens to protect themselves and that’s the Second Amendment, and that’s why our party stands so strongly for that."
Johnson added it was “not the time to be talking legislation" because the crisis was ongoing.
Asked if there was any new gun legislation he would consider, Johnson demurred, saying he had only been in the job for 48 hours.
“We’ll see,” he said, before reiterating he thought it was “not the weapon, it’s the underlying issue.”

2. Same-sex marriage is ‘the law of the land’​

Johnson, who previously was a member of the Louisiana state legislature before being elected to Congress in 2016, has a long history of fighting against gay rights. Hannity asked about some of the comments he had made, some in writing, calling homosexuality “sinful, destructive” and his opposition to gay marriage.



“I don’t even remember some of them,” Johnson said of the comments, adding that he was a religious liberty defense lawyer who had been called upon to defend state amendments in court.

Johnson called himself “a rule of law guy” and acknowledged that when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges legalizing same-sex marriage, then “that became the law of the land.”
“I respect the rule of law, but I also genuinely love all people, regardless of their lifestyle choices,” Johnson told Hannity.
Later, Johnson seemed to criticize the fact that “five justices on the Supreme Court changed” the definition of marriage — a clip that was then blasted out by Biden’s reelection campaign.

3. Putin can’t be allowed to prevail in Ukraine​

Though Johnson has recently voted against additional aid for Ukraine, in his interview he suggested he would be open to sending more funding to the Eastern European country as it continues fending off a Russian invasion — as long as it was in a separate package from aid to Israel. The White House has requested $61 billion in funding for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel.



“I told the staff at the White House today that our consensus among House Republicans is we need to bifurcate those issues,” Johnson told Hannity, referring to a brief meeting he had with President Biden earlier Thursday.
“Now we can’t allow Vladimir Putin to prevail in Ukraine because I don’t believe it would stop there, and it would probably encourage and empower China to perhaps make a move on Taiwan," he added. “We have these concerns. We’re not going to abandon [Ukraine].”

4. Biden ‘very likely’ committed impeachable offenses​

Johnson, who until this week was a member of the House Judiciary Committee, seemed to suggest House Republicans would likely impeach Biden.

GOP lawmakers launched a formal impeachment inquiry into the president last month, alleging he accepted bribes from foreign sources in business dealings with his son and brother, but have not produced direct evidence that the president benefited from those dealings.


“If in fact all the evidence leads to where we believe it will, that’s very likely impeachable offenses,” Johnson said. “It looks and smells a lot like [bribery]... The evidence is coming together. We’ll see where it leads.”

5. A stop-gap funding bill would have ‘certain conditions’​

To avert a government shutdown after a Nov. 17 deadline, Johnson has proposed passing a stopgap funding bill, or continuing resolution, to fund the government until Jan. 15 or April 15.
Former House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) took the same approach to avoid a government shutdown last month — and it led to his ouster by hard-right Republicans who were furious that McCarthy had worked with Democrats.
Johnson told Hannity that another stopgap funding measure would need to be done “with certain conditions,” without specifying what those conditions would be.
 
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) gave his first national television interview since winning the speaker’s gavel, sitting down for an hour with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.
During the interview, which aired Thursday night, the newly minted speaker, offered his views on a wide range of issues, including the latest mass shootings in Maine. Johnson, who previously was a lesser-known conservative, also addressed his first major challenge: ensuring the government is funded before a looming Nov. 17 deadline.


Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

Here are some highlights of what Johnson said he believes.

1. Guns are not the problem in mass shootings​

Johnson opened his interview by offering condolences to the victims of the mass shooting Wednesday night in Lewiston, Maine, which killed at least 18 people and led to a massive manhunt for the suspected gunman.



“The end of the day, it’s — the problem is the human heart,” Johnson said. “It’s not guns, it’s not the weapons. At the end of the day, we have to protect the right of the citizens to protect themselves and that’s the Second Amendment, and that’s why our party stands so strongly for that."
Johnson added it was “not the time to be talking legislation" because the crisis was ongoing.
Asked if there was any new gun legislation he would consider, Johnson demurred, saying he had only been in the job for 48 hours.
“We’ll see,” he said, before reiterating he thought it was “not the weapon, it’s the underlying issue.”

2. Same-sex marriage is ‘the law of the land’​

Johnson, who previously was a member of the Louisiana state legislature before being elected to Congress in 2016, has a long history of fighting against gay rights. Hannity asked about some of the comments he had made, some in writing, calling homosexuality “sinful, destructive” and his opposition to gay marriage.



“I don’t even remember some of them,” Johnson said of the comments, adding that he was a religious liberty defense lawyer who had been called upon to defend state amendments in court.

Johnson called himself “a rule of law guy” and acknowledged that when the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges legalizing same-sex marriage, then “that became the law of the land.”
“I respect the rule of law, but I also genuinely love all people, regardless of their lifestyle choices,” Johnson told Hannity.
Later, Johnson seemed to criticize the fact that “five justices on the Supreme Court changed” the definition of marriage — a clip that was then blasted out by Biden’s reelection campaign.

3. Putin can’t be allowed to prevail in Ukraine​

Though Johnson has recently voted against additional aid for Ukraine, in his interview he suggested he would be open to sending more funding to the Eastern European country as it continues fending off a Russian invasion — as long as it was in a separate package from aid to Israel. The White House has requested $61 billion in funding for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel.



“I told the staff at the White House today that our consensus among House Republicans is we need to bifurcate those issues,” Johnson told Hannity, referring to a brief meeting he had with President Biden earlier Thursday.
“Now we can’t allow Vladimir Putin to prevail in Ukraine because I don’t believe it would stop there, and it would probably encourage and empower China to perhaps make a move on Taiwan," he added. “We have these concerns. We’re not going to abandon [Ukraine].”

4. Biden ‘very likely’ committed impeachable offenses​

Johnson, who until this week was a member of the House Judiciary Committee, seemed to suggest House Republicans would likely impeach Biden.

GOP lawmakers launched a formal impeachment inquiry into the president last month, alleging he accepted bribes from foreign sources in business dealings with his son and brother, but have not produced direct evidence that the president benefited from those dealings.


“If in fact all the evidence leads to where we believe it will, that’s very likely impeachable offenses,” Johnson said. “It looks and smells a lot like [bribery]... The evidence is coming together. We’ll see where it leads.”

5. A stop-gap funding bill would have ‘certain conditions’​

To avert a government shutdown after a Nov. 17 deadline, Johnson has proposed passing a stopgap funding bill, or continuing resolution, to fund the government until Jan. 15 or April 15.
Former House speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) took the same approach to avoid a government shutdown last month — and it led to his ouster by hard-right Republicans who were furious that McCarthy had worked with Democrats.
Johnson told Hannity that another stopgap funding measure would need to be done “with certain conditions,” without specifying what those conditions would be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ree4
Poor libs upset

Sad Season 1 Episode 1 GIF by NBC
 
He is definitely a nutbag from what I can tell of his various statements.

But, it does seem likely he had to appease the GOP moderates given his equivocation on Ukraine. I hope that is the case and maybe he will skew a bit towards the middle during his speakership. If he does not this will not go well for the GOP house in the 2024 election.

The Dems obviously smell blood in the water as they should.
 
0 out of 10
What? No recent politician I can remember has quoted the bible more than Pelosi. She even made up quotes and attributed them to the bible. Funny how it was never a big deal to anyone here or any Dems all those times she did it.

Here...see for yourself how much she did it. Makes Johnson look like a Pagan.

 
What? No recent politician I can remember has quoted the bible more than Pelosi. She even made up quotes and attributed them to the bible. Funny how it was never a big deal to anyone here or any Dems all those times she did it.

Here...see for yourself how much she did it. Makes Johnson look like a Pagan.

This isn't about quoting the Bible. It's about believing that stuff like Noah's Ark actually happened. I know you know the difference which is why I gave you a 0 for your effort.
 
This isn't about quoting the Bible. It's about believing that stuff like Noah's Ark actually happened. I know you know the difference which is why I gave you a 0 for your effort.
Well…she has Jesus returning soon to judge her in the clip I shared. You don’t find that to be outlandish? Sure you don’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogBoyRy
What? No recent politician I can remember has quoted the bible more than Pelosi. She even made up quotes and attributed them to the bible. Funny how it was never a big deal to anyone here or any Dems all those times she did it.

Here...see for yourself how much she did it. Makes Johnson look like a Pagan.

Uh huh...now tell us how that impacted her governance. What policies did she justify with appeals to Biblical script? You got video of that?

She actually - in YOUR quotes - distances her governance from her faith. So thanks for that.

I have ZERO issues with a professed Christian...until they use their faith to put THEIR rules on others.
 
Last edited:
Uh huh...now tell us how that impacted her governance. What policies did she justify with appeals to Biblical script? You got video of that?

She actually - in YOUR quotes - distances her governance from her faith. So thanks for that.

I have ZERO issues with a professed Christian...until they use their faith to put THEIR rules on others.
Did you just skip over the part of the video where she says…”And that Word is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word.

Are you saying that if this guy said we need to make public policy in accordance to what the scripture says, you’d have no problem with it, correct? lol…get the hell out of here man. You guys are all so full of shit on this issue. Hypocrites.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) gave his first national television interview since winning the speaker’s gavel, sitting down for an hour with Fox News’s Sean Hannity.
During the interview, which aired Thursday night, the newly minted speaker, offered his views on a wide range of issues, including the latest mass shootings in Maine. Johnson, who previously was a lesser-known conservative, also addressed his first major challenge: ensuring the government is funded before a looming Nov. 17 deadline.


Keeping up with politics is easy with The 5-Minute Fix Newsletter, in your inbox weekdays.

Here are some highlights of what Johnson said he believes.

1. Guns are not the problem in mass shootings​

Johnson opened his interview by offering condolences to the victims of the mass shooting Wednesday night in Lewiston, Maine, which killed at least 18 people and led to a massive manhunt for the suspected gunman.

“The end of the day, it’s — the problem is the human heart,” Johnson said. “It’s not guns, it’s not the weapons. At the end of the day, we have to protect the right of the citizens to protect themselves and that’s the Second Amendment, and that’s why our party stands so strongly for that."
Johnson added it was “not the time to be talking legislation" because the crisis was ongoing.
Asked if there was any new gun legislation he would consider, Johnson demurred, saying he had only been in the job for 48 hours.
“We’ll see,” he said, before reiterating he thought it was “not the weapon, it’s the underlying issue.”
Okay, I agree in premise, but not in lack of action. Of course the problem is in the heart, but HOW IN THE HELL ARE YOU GOING TO FIX THE HUMAN HEART and how are you going to do it NOW!? I've said this all along, make changes to the gun laws now, then focus on the underlying issue afterwards.

I'll take "prevent guy with $hitty heart from purchasing a gun" over "allow $hitty heart guy to purchase a gun" any day.

I know, he can find one on the street, you can't stop them all, blah blah blah. If gun reform stops ONE guy, it's better than stopping NO guys.
 
Did you just skip over the part of the video where she says…”And that Word is, we have to give voice to what that means in terms of public policy that would be in keeping with the values of the Word.

Are you saying that if this guy said we need to make public policy in accordance to what the scripture says, you’d have no problem with it, correct? lol…get the hell out of here man. You guys are all so full of shit on this issue. Hypocrites.
You might want to read again what I posted. I'd absolutely call her on that - if she's using specific scripture to push a specific policy - you know, like - homosexuality is an abomination and homosexual sex should be outlawed. This is the genius that is your buddy, Mike:

“Homosexual relationships are inherently unnatural and, the studies clearly show, are ultimately harmful and costly for everyone. Society cannot give its stamp of approval to such a dangerous lifestyle. If we change marriage for this tiny, modern minority, we will have to do it for every deviant group. Polygamists, polyamorists, pedophiles, and others will be next in line to claim equal protection. They already are. There will be no legal basis to deny a bisexual the right to marry a partner of each sex, or a person to marry his pet.”

That's HIS religion expressed as policy. Now...can you point to actual policies Pelosi put in place using scripture to justify them?
 
You might want to read again what I posted. I'd absolutely call her on that - if she's using specific scripture to push a specific policy - you know, like - homosexuality is an abomination and homosexual sex should be outlawed. This is the genius that is your buddy, Mike:

“Homosexual relationships are inherently unnatural and, the studies clearly show, are ultimately harmful and costly for everyone. Society cannot give its stamp of approval to such a dangerous lifestyle. If we change marriage for this tiny, modern minority, we will have to do it for every deviant group. Polygamists, polyamorists, pedophiles, and others will be next in line to claim equal protection. They already are. There will be no legal basis to deny a bisexual the right to marry a partner of each sex, or a person to marry his pet.”

That's HIS religion expressed as policy. Now...can you point to actual policies Pelosi put in place using scripture to justify them?
What does that have to do with Noah’s Ark? That’s the point of contention in my first post. If you’re calling out someone for believing Noah’s ark but not calling out “he’s coming back real soon to judge how we made laws”, you’re a hypocrite.

I completely agree with you we shouldn’t be using the Bible to push policy and this guy is a whackadoodle.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: RileyHawk
What does that have to do with Noah’s Ark? That’s the point of contention in my first post. If you’re calling out someone for believing Noah’s ark but not calling out “he’s coming back real soon to judge how we made laws”, you’re a hypocrite.

I completely agree with you we shouldn’t be using the Bible to push policy and this guy is a whackadoodle.
Then you should have said so after reading my first post. I have zero problems with people believing in Noah's Ark or a flat Earth or leprechauns. But when you push flat Earth or Noah's Ark into legislation, you're off the rails. Pelosi doesn't do that to my knowledge. Mikey absolutely wants to.
 
Johnson said. “It’s not guns, it’s not the weapons..."

I agree and this is so unfair. I also strenuously object to the term "mass shootings"... From this point forward I hope everyone can refrain from using unfair and inflammatory terms like this. Please refer to all incidents where many people are torn to shreds by high powered assault style rifles as mass loss of life events. Then and only then can we have a frank and honest dialog about the mental health crises facing this great nation.

T's and P's everyone.
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: cigaretteman
Pssst.
If I were you I’d just copy and paste.
Not defending any MAGA stuff but Hillary is a lying POS. Like it or not.
No question. Or as much of a liar as her husband but still a liar. The only president on my lifetime who o consider to be completely and unquestionably honest was Carter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: goldmom
Number 2. Believe that was the stock answer of every conservative judge on the Supreme Court for Roe vs Wade.
 
Then you should have said so after reading my first post. I have zero problems with people believing in Noah's Ark or a flat Earth or leprechauns. But when you push flat Earth or Noah's Ark into legislation, you're off the rails. Pelosi doesn't do that to my knowledge. Mikey absolutely wants to.
There’s a lot of people pushing a lot of stupid non-biblical ideas into the policy sphere as well (see “Defind the police” and “End mass incarceration now”). That’s why we have a bunch of people in our representative republic. To shoot the dumb shit down. Is this your first encounter with a politician pushing dumb shit?
 
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: Ree4 and RileyHawk
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT