ADVERTISEMENT

What's going on in Montana?

Amazon Prime Video GIF by The Man in the High Castle

Here’s a time when he left.

 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeyetraveler
If a candidate gets a plurality of the vote in the general election but not a majority then is it truly “what the people want”?
Then hold a runoff if someone doesn’t get >50% of the vote. Trying to kill the Libertarian Party in your state so they won’t have a voice in the debates and run-up to the election is pathetic.
 
Then hold a runoff if someone doesn’t get >50% of the vote. Trying to kill the Libertarian Party in your state so they won’t have a voice in the debates and run-up to the election is pathetic.
The end result would be the same.
 
The end result would be the same.
Not necessarily. Tester won a majority in the last Senate election, which was a three-way race. This is solely to silence the strong Libertarian Party in Montana.
 
Since no one answered it in the other thread, I guess I’ll ask the same question again here.

What’s California’s reasoning for using the exact same process?

California’s process is limited to a single election, like Montana is trying to implement only for this Tester Senate election?

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT