ADVERTISEMENT

When Will You Get Worried About the Coronavirus?

  • The death toll stands at 213 inside China and confirmed infections are 9,096
  • Possible infections are at 12,167 inside China with recoveries listed as 163
  • The World Health organisation has declared a global public health emergency because of the spread of the virus outside China, describing it as an “unprecedented outbreak”.
  • Cases outside China of the virus are increasing and is estimated to be over 100.
  • Recent global updates include Italy (2), France (6), Germany (5), Australia (9).
https://www.theguardian.com/world/l...uation-foreign-nationals-citizens-latest-news
213/12167 = 1.7%. Those dying are the elderly and those with compromised immune systems. I get being concerned bc you're old, but using black death in the same sentence as this is just reckless. Especially for someone who pretends to care about science and facts lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: *33* and ghost80
It is getting very scary IMHO. Remember the huge SARS outbreak of 2002-2003. This one has already infected more total people and almost matched the countries impacted total in a month. It has not matched the death total but I don't think the numbers, especially deaths are caught up. They blockaded roads to 30 million people and have bodies in the street.

24117012-7951059-image-a-13_1580456976608.jpg


Does not seem to be slowing down and really it is too late to put controls in place with all the air travel that has taken place since late December. The math is scary. They estimated the Spanish Flu impacted 1/3 of the world population in a time before air travel and really even car travel. But if you use that as a conservative analogy and assume the 2.1% death rate is about right that there is potential for 2.5 billion cases and 52,500,000 deaths. Interestingly your more advanced nations may have larger outbreaks that offset better medical treatments. The Spanish Flu hit 40% of the US they say. But if you keep it at 1/3 of the US 330,000,000 population and use a low 1ish percent mortality rate you are talking 3-4 million deaths here. 5 million at 1.5 percent. 7 million at 2.1%. And heaven help us if they are under reporting deaths...

Almost every family has a close relative killed by the Spanish Flu. My grandmothers sister died from it at age 9.
 
  • Like
Reactions: billanole
It is getting very scary IMHO. Remember the huge SARS outbreak of 2002-2003. This one has already infected more total people and almost matched the countries impacted total in a month. It has not matched the death total but I don't think the numbers, especially deaths are caught up. They blockaded roads to 30 million people and have bodies in the street.

24117012-7951059-image-a-13_1580456976608.jpg


Does not seem to be slowing down and really it is too late to put controls in place with all the air travel that has taken place since late December. The math is scary. They estimated the Spanish Flu impacted 1/3 of the world population in a time before air travel and really even car travel. But if you use that as a conservative analogy and assume the 2.1% death rate is about right that there is potential for 2.5 billion cases and 52,500,000 deaths. Interestingly your more advanced nations may have larger outbreaks that offset better medical treatments. The Spanish Flu hit 40% of the US they say. But if you keep it at 1/3 of the US 330,000,000 population and use a low 1ish percent mortality rate you are talking 3-4 million deaths here. 5 million at 1.4 percent. 7 million at 2.1%. And heaven help us if they are under reporting deaths...

Almost every family has a close relative killed by the Spanish Flu. My grandmothers sister died from it at age 9.
The 2.1% death rate isn't remotely accurate at this point, mainly bc A LOT of mild cases have not been reported and those dying are elderly and compromised. Pump the breaks on the fear and panic. And nice pic btw, I'm sure that person just up and dropped dead conveniently in the street :rolleyes:
 
Labs have already been able to recreate this virus......that is a big step in learning how to combat it including vaccines to prevent/diminish its effects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
The 2.1% death rate isn't remotely accurate at this point, mainly bc A LOT of mild cases have not been reported and those dying are elderly and compromised. Pump the breaks on the fear and panic. And nice pic btw, I'm sure that person just up and dropped dead conveniently in the street :rolleyes:

Probably fake and was posed in San Francisco's Chinatown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattski
Labs have already been able to recreate this virus......that is a big step in learning how to combat it including vaccines to prevent/diminish its effects.
... and the vaccine will be available in about a year. Worrisome for sure, if not scary.
 
The 2.1% death rate isn't remotely accurate at this point, mainly bc A LOT of mild cases have not been reported and those dying are elderly and compromised. Pump the breaks on the fear and panic. And nice pic btw, I'm sure that person just up and dropped dead conveniently in the street :rolleyes:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ad-streets-coronavirus-ground-zero-Wuhan.html

I see your side but also think a ton of deaths also have not been reported. The Spanish Flu is the one everyone worries about. It really is the most forgotten story ever. They estimate 3-6% of the world population died. The hope for us a lot of research has been spent to be ready and develop a vaccine ASAP for this event.

But I am at the point where for me, personally this is concerning me and I may start making some plans to be ready if a worst case scenario happens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BelemNole
Somewhere around 35 million infected in the US and 50,000 deaths. So basically slightly less worse than last year's flu season.

Until then it's just the disease du jour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mattski
213/12167 = 1.7%.
That's not the right way to look at it - at least until the number of new cases stops rising for at least as long as it takes for people to die after contracting the disease.

I don't know the time line for this disease. But if it takes, say, 10 days for people to die, then we should be comparing that 200+ number of deaths with the infection level 10 days ago. In which case, the mortality rate is in the 10-20% range.

That number, in turn, may be high because the early deaths may have occurred before hospitals and doctors knew how to treat the disease.

Eventually the mortality rate will settle out.

They are now saying you can be contagious even before you are symptomatic. That complicates detection and prevention efforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
A week or so ago there were 400 infected people and a handful of deaths. All in China (iirc).

A few days ago there were 4000 infected people, in a number of nations, and 80-odd deaths.

Now it's around 8000 infected - including 6 in the US - and over a hundred deaths.

When does it get "real" to you?
I"m going to Puerto Vallarta next Friday. Starting to get very worried...

4-5-Alcohol-Corona-Beer-Wholesale.jpg_350x350.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarolinaHawkeye
I"m going to Puerto Vallarta next Friday. Starting to get very worried...

4-5-Alcohol-Corona-Beer-Wholesale.jpg_350x350.jpg
That raises another good question. Where wouldn't you travel? I'd be reluctant to visit a nation that didn't have what I perceived as a very good health system.

Heck, if there are more cases in the US, I might not want to travel to some states or cities.

I mean suppose you heard that there were several confirmed cases in Chicago (or New Orleans, or pick another city), would you travel there (assuming you had a no-fault way to get out of your plans)?

Even without confirmed cases, I'm not traveling to Puerto Rico.
 
May not be an airline that can get you there at this point.

I'm flying on Cathay Pacific and as of a couple hours ago, they weren't offering any refunds or waivers. Sucks as this trip has been planned since summer and it's one I should have done a long time ago
 
That raises another good question. Where wouldn't you travel? I'd be reluctant to visit a nation that didn't have what I perceived as a very good health system.

Heck, if there are more cases in the US, I might not want to travel to some states or cities.

I mean suppose you heard that there were several confirmed cases in Chicago (or New Orleans, or pick another city), would you travel there (assuming you had a no-fault way to get out of your plans)?

Even without confirmed cases, I'm not traveling to Puerto Rico.
I"m going to ask DL if they can board the uncleansed who sit in coach from the back so they don't have to walk past me.
 
I think the mortality rate will be about the same as the regular flu, 1%, very young and old. I haven't seen any info out there on the age of these people who died so I could be very wrong. The transmission rate seems to be higher than the average flu. It might be because the infectious can go like 10 days spreading it without showing symptoms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ghost80
I'm flying on Cathay Pacific and as of a couple hours ago, they weren't offering any refunds or waivers. Sucks as this trip has been planned since summer and it's one I should have done a long time ago
The odds of being cooped up for hours in a sealed container with a person infected with the coronavirus on this flight are near zero.

The trip back, on the other hand....
 
  • Like
Reactions: billanole
I think the mortality rate will be about the same as the regular flu, 1%, very young and old. I haven't seen any info out there on the age of these people who died so I could be very wrong. The transmission rate seems to be higher than the average flu. It might be because the infectious can go like 10 days spreading it without showing symptoms.
What would the mortality rate for regular flu be if we had no vaccines?
 
  • Like
Reactions: noleclone2
I think the mortality rate will be about the same as the regular flu, 1%, very young and old. I haven't seen any info out there on the age of these people who died so I could be very wrong. The transmission rate seems to be higher than the average flu. It might be because the infectious can go like 10 days spreading it without showing symptoms.

LOL the mortality rate for the flu is not 1% in the US, thank god or up to 260,000 people would be dead from it this season.

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/preliminary-in-season-estimates.htm
 
Saturday 01 Feb 2020

I assume it's a good sign that the number of cured is catching up to the number of dead.

● China said there are now 11,791 confirmed cases of coronavirus in the country, plus 20 in Hong Kong and Macao and 10 in the self-governing island of Taiwan, with 259 people dead and 243 people cured.
● That’s a rise of more 2,000 in the number of infected people and 46 in the death toll from the previous day as Chinese hospitals struggle with shortages of medical equipment and beds. The virus has also reached 22 other countries.
● The United States has imposed unprecedented restrictions on travel to and from China, advising its citizens not to travel there and barring foreigners from entering the U.S. if they have been in China during the previous 14 days. A growing number of countries are taking similar action.
● The risks to the Chinese economy are growing, with many businesses across the country, including all Apple stores, set to remain closed for at least another week and consumers staying home and cutting spending.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...48f4c6-4471-11ea-99c7-1dfd4241a2fe_story.html
 
Once the big pharma companies start creating a vaccine is when I will be worried. Amirite?
 
Random factoid: The box of surgical masks that was going for $5 last weekend is now selling for a cool $70-$100.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT