been reading all the threads about the new kirk and how he has re-immersed, re-dedicated himself and the team to success. which i couldn't be happier about. but it got me to thinking... to whom do we owe the pleasure?
kirk said that he hadn't been investing the necessary time and energy due to all the fund raising for the new facilities he was involved with and his preparation struggled because of it. so maybe it was just a matter of time, like after the completion of the new fb complex, before the re-emergence of the teams under the old kirk we all loved.
but what would have happened if we didn't get blown out last year in the bowl game, or lost the way we did against neb and the goofs? i think most would agree, the pitchfork and torch wielders that came out in droves after those games, and their clamor, was the impetus, the wake up call, for the head man and his staff. would it have been the same old kirk, the same old GDGD this year without them?
is this the classic market driven change that they all claimed needed to be undertaken? do we owe that group of boisterous fans a small token of appreciation? are we 4-0 right now to some extent because of what some called the bandwagon fans?
should the university give them a bigger reward than a $70 concession voucher as a sign of gratitude?
kirk said that he hadn't been investing the necessary time and energy due to all the fund raising for the new facilities he was involved with and his preparation struggled because of it. so maybe it was just a matter of time, like after the completion of the new fb complex, before the re-emergence of the teams under the old kirk we all loved.
but what would have happened if we didn't get blown out last year in the bowl game, or lost the way we did against neb and the goofs? i think most would agree, the pitchfork and torch wielders that came out in droves after those games, and their clamor, was the impetus, the wake up call, for the head man and his staff. would it have been the same old kirk, the same old GDGD this year without them?
is this the classic market driven change that they all claimed needed to be undertaken? do we owe that group of boisterous fans a small token of appreciation? are we 4-0 right now to some extent because of what some called the bandwagon fans?
should the university give them a bigger reward than a $70 concession voucher as a sign of gratitude?