ADVERTISEMENT

Who will Trump choose for his VP? Who should he?

That is exactly what I am telling you. They were generally center-right politically and didn't get caught up in the Obama hoopla. They were McCain supporters until he decided to really ramp up Palin's role and that was the tipping point where they wouldn't vote for that ticket.

Have you ever seen a VP get more play that Palin? I voted Romney in the last election and I can't recall his running mate but I can still remember that Palin was VP in 2008.

Either way, they're idiots. If they would actually vote against a VP candidate (completely irrelevant under our constitution) instead of for the presidential candidate that they would prefer, they're too stupid to be active voting members in this country.

Send their names to Ted Cruz and get them put on a mailer or something.
 
He is the overwhelming frontrunner at this point, according to just about everyone. By one month from today, approximately 60% of the delegates will have been decided, with Trump having sizable leads in the vast majority of those states.
Rookie troll.
 
Either way, they're idiots. If they would actually vote against a VP candidate (completely irrelevant under our constitution) instead of for the presidential candidate that they would prefer, they're too stupid to be active voting members in this country.

Send their names to Ted Cruz and get them put on a mailer or something.
I completely agree and I tried to explain to them how their logic was flawed. Remember, we are talking about women here...
 
The most recent being 52 years ago. How many of the died-in-office contingent happened before the discovery of penicillin?

It's not exactly a common occurrence. In the last 100 years, off the top of my head, I think it's only happened twice (Harding and JFK). Oops, 3 times. Forgot FDR.

That would mean in the lifetime of any poster on this board, the vote for vice president has had significance exactly one time, ever. And even that guy would have only had a little over 1 year to be a screw-up had voters not elected him in his own right. Doesn't seem like something to which a lot of time and resources should be devoted to thinking about.
Penicillin would not have helped Lincoln, Garfield, or McKinley. 15 percent of the president's of the US have been succeeded by their VP. That is not insignificant. People still want to kill US presidents for a lot of reasons ranging from crazy in love over Jody Foster to crazy over ideology. There is no shot or pill to fix older folks with bad hearts or other maladies. VP is relevant.
 
He is the overwhelming frontrunner at this point, according to just about everyone. By one month from today, approximately 60% of the delegates will have been decided, with Trump having sizable leads in the vast majority of those states.

So far Trump has 17 of the 1237 delegates needed to secure the nomination. SC runs a winner take all by state and district, so it is conceivable he could capture all 50 SC delegates on Saturday. The 24 primaries or caucuses held between SC and March 15 are proportional. Assuming Trump stays below 35% (and I think he will drop below 30%), he will be nowhere close to having the delegates he requires.

Kasich will stay in the race to make sure he gets Ohio's 66 winner takes all delegates March 15. Florida is winner takes all that day as well and I think Rubio will close quickly down there and could take that state's 99 delegates.

What I am getting at, is Trump's road to the nomination is not easy. In my opinion he maxes out at 40% support. I continue to say, no way he wins the nomination.
 
Penicillin would not have helped Lincoln, Garfield, or McKinley. 15 percent of the president's of the US have been succeeded by their VP. That is not insignificant. People still want to kill US presidents for a lot of reasons ranging from crazy in love over Jody Foster to crazy over ideology. There is no shot or pill to fix older folks with bad hearts or other maladies. VP is relevant.

Successful assassination in this day and age of heightened security is virtually impossible.

The first 3 assassinated presidents where shot at basically point blank range. Completely and 100% not possible today. The JFK thing was basically a freak accident (assuming you believe in the Oswald lone nut theory, which I wholeheartedly do).

You really think assassination is a legitimate concern in modern times? How is it possible that Obama has managed to survive 7 years without so much as a scratch?

15 percent of the president's of the US have been succeeded by their VP. That is not insignificant.

And exactly one in the last 50 years, genius. That is getting as close to insignificant as possible.

I mean, you could also say that 15% of US presidents were slave owners, so we really need to focus on excluding such racist assholes from ascending to the presidency.

It's a factually accurate statement but demonstrates a profound lack of historical knowledge on the person that is making it, much like the argument that you are trying to make here.

In the lifetime of anyone posting on this board, exactly one vice president has assumed the office due to presidential death, and it was over 50 freaking years ago.
 
Last edited:
Just because he's not a full blown nutbag doesn't mean he's not a conservative. How exactly is he a liberal?

Like Jeb said, Reagan would be ran out of today's GOP as a left wing Hollywood loon.
I've asked him this question a couple times and he has yet to respond
 
I disagree with this a lot. I know a lot of women who didn't vote for McCain/Palin ticket just because they didn't like how Palin represented women.
On the flip side, I think a non-insignificant number of people changed their choice to Obama after McCain gave us direct evidence that he was incapable of making good decisions on a large scale.

In other words, a poor VP choice could sink a decent presidential candidate, but Trump could choose the combined incarnation of Ghandi, MLK, and the Dalai Lama (or some trifecta of the best economic and military minds, take your pick) and he still wouldn't get more than 40% of the popular vote.
 
Successful assassination in this day and age of heightened security is virtually impossible.

The first 3 assassinated presidents where shot at basically point blank range. Completely and 100% not possible today. The JFK thing was basically a freak accident (assuming you believe in the Oswald lone nut theory, which I wholeheartedly do).

You really think assassination is a legitimate concern in modern times? How is it possible that Obama has managed to survive 7 years without so much as a scratch?



And exactly one in the last 50 years, genius. That is getting as close to insignificant as possible.

I mean, you could also say that 15% of US presidents were slave owners, so we really need to focus on excluding such racist assholes from ascending to the presidency.

It's a factually accurate statement but demonstrates a profound lack of historical knowledge on the person that is making it, much like the argument that you are trying to make here.

In the lifetime of anyone posting on this board, exactly one vice president has assumed the office due to presidential death, and it was over 50 freaking years ago.
You are interesting. I'm glad you stopped in for awhile. I'm guessing you will burn brightly and briefly here.
 
So far Trump has 17 of the 1237 delegates needed to secure the nomination. SC runs a winner take all by state and district, so it is conceivable he could capture all 50 SC delegates on Saturday. The 24 primaries or caucuses held between SC and March 15 are proportional. Assuming Trump stays below 35% (and I think he will drop below 30%), he will be nowhere close to having the delegates he requires.

Kasich will stay in the race to make sure he gets Ohio's 66 winner takes all delegates March 15. Florida is winner takes all that day as well and I think Rubio will close quickly down there and could take that state's 99 delegates.

What I am getting at, is Trump's road to the nomination is not easy. In my opinion he maxes out at 40% support. I continue to say, no way he wins the nomination.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...onald-trump-is-for-the-republican-nomination/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-trump-wins-south-carolina-can-he-be-stopped/
 

I think you will be surprised tomorrow. Trump may win, but will underperform. If Trump is in 20s along with Cruz and/or Rubio, the story will be his eroding support. Bush will drop out, along with (maybe) Carson. I think Kasich stays in until Ohio. All Bush support will go to Rubio or Kasich.

I am convinced Trump hit his high water mark in NH with 35%. His crazy statements are bound to catch up with him soon and I believe it starts tomorrow.
 
I've been posting here longer than you have, dipshit, and will for quite awhile after you're gone.
You've only been here since Saturday? And, you won't last with that acerbic tone. What was your last personality?
 
Does anyone think Ernst would be a legitimate running mate for Trump, or any Republican for that matter?
 
Based on what I've seen from Donald Trump I believe he will choose one of the following:
a) Ronald Reagan
b) Deadpool
c) A velociraptor
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucas80
If Trump did win the nomination, he would probably select one of the guys he is competing with. I have long thought Kasich would be the VP no matter the nominee. Rubio and Carson are also a possibility.
 
There's only one right answer here:

635735362948261100-424114342_jesse-ventura-ap1.jpg
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT