ADVERTISEMENT

Will Hillary be indicted? Should she?

I've always suspected that the reason Hillary initially decided to go with the unusual email set-up had something to do with obfuscating details regarding the Clinton Foundation. Now it sounds like there some evidence of that.

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html

I've linked the "About" section from Benghazi House Investigation website. Where does it say they were tasked into looking at email servers? This was a witch hunt from the start. They may have found something. If you looked at a dozen officials in a similar manner you'd find something on every one.
https://benghazi.house.gov/about
 
  • Like
Reactions: cigaretteman
Sorry. Doesn't work that way. If using private emails is a common practice, as it was with Hillary, then it's clearly not an accepted standard. That's the point.

Just ignore Colin Powell for a minute. Why did Hillary set up a private server in the first place? Could it be that she was trying to hide illegal activities involving the Clinton Foundation? Like Public Corruption?

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html
 
I've linked the "About" section from Benghazi House Investigation website. Where does it say they were tasked into looking at email servers? This was a witch hunt from the start. They may have found something. If you looked at a dozen officials in a similar manner you'd find something on every one.
https://benghazi.house.gov/about

You are asking the wrong person here. I'm not going down the Bengazi path.
 
More reading material...

Today's news suggests a third, very serious, prong to the investigation that may date back as far as last spring. If Herridge's sources are correct, federal agents are also scrutinizing whether Clinton's work as America's top diplomat was unethically influenced by her personal and financial interests vis-a-vis the Clinton Foundation -- which charity watchdogs and former employees have described as a "slush fund," and something quite different froma bona fide charitable organization. Various deep dives into the Clinton Foundation's books and history have turned up serious questions involving national security-compromising deals, pay-to-play access-peddling, cronyist favoritism, unseemly greed, undisclosed and unvetted foreign donations (in violation of signed transparency agreements), and egregiously inaccurate tax filings.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...expands-again-now-probing-corruption-n2102799
 
More reading material...

Today's news suggests a third, very serious, prong to the investigation that may date back as far as last spring. If Herridge's sources are correct, federal agents are also scrutinizing whether Clinton's work as America's top diplomat was unethically influenced by her personal and financial interests vis-a-vis the Clinton Foundation -- which charity watchdogs and former employees have described as a "slush fund," and something quite different froma bona fide charitable organization. Various deep dives into the Clinton Foundation's books and history have turned up serious questions involving national security-compromising deals, pay-to-play access-peddling, cronyist favoritism, unseemly greed, undisclosed and unvetted foreign donations (in violation of signed transparency agreements), and egregiously inaccurate tax filings.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guyben...expands-again-now-probing-corruption-n2102799

Sorry, these things simply don't matter to the American public anymore. Politicians lie and we should just lay down and accept this type of behavior out of them...lies don't matter.
 
Sorry, these things simply don't matter to the American public anymore. Politicians lie and we should just lay down and accept this type of behavior out of them...lies don't matter.

I've got to disagree with that. Polls show people are not happy with Hillary's perceived dishonesty.
 
I've linked the "About" section from Benghazi House Investigation website. Where does it say they were tasked into looking at email servers? This was a witch hunt from the start. They may have found something. If you looked at a dozen officials in a similar manner you'd find something on every one.
https://benghazi.house.gov/about
The e-mail server was not unearthed by the committee. It was discovered by the State Department while it was in the process of responding to a request from the committee for information about Benghazi-related communications.
 
Just ignore Colin Powell for a minute. Why did Hillary set up a private server in the first place? Could it be that she was trying to hide illegal activities involving the Clinton Foundation? Like Public Corruption?

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html
Jesus Christ. Now this has turned into a conspiracy over the Clinton Foundation? I thought this was about her time as SOS? Do you see why you guys sound nuts? You keep changing what you're outraged about.

And we've been over this. Nobody from the FBI is authorized to talk about the investigation. So any "news" you get about it is just speculation. Your three sources don't mean crap.
 
If she has been found to have involved in criminal activity, she should and will be indicted. Personally, I doubt either is the case, however, as these have all been politically driven witch hunts from the start with no real merit or basis in reality.
 
If she has been found to have involved in criminal activity, she should and will be indicted. Personally, I doubt either is the case, however, as these have all been politically driven witch hunts from the start with no real merit or basis in reality.
You just said she could be involved in criminal activity, yet this is a witch hunt. Investigating possible criminal, activity is not a witch hunt.
 
Jesus Christ. Now this has turned into a conspiracy over the Clinton Foundation? I thought this was about her time as SOS? Do you see why you guys sound nuts? You keep changing what you're outraged about.

And we've been over this. Nobody from the FBI is authorized to talk about the investigation. So any "news" you get about it is just speculation. Your three sources don't mean crap.

I know, it's like all the conspiracy theory talk about Dick Cheney, Haliburton, and the Iraq war.
 
Obama's FBI is probably not conducting a witch hunt against the DEMS #1 candidate. They are conducting a criminal probe into possible criminal conduct. National Secret were sent via unauthorized emails and possibly faxes.

If this was a Republican's issue Ciggy and Huey would be all over it!

If the Trump foundation was set up like the Clinton Foundation is would be the end of the world to MSNBC or the Huffington Report.
 
Jesus Christ. Now this has turned into a conspiracy over the Clinton Foundation? I thought this was about her time as SOS? Do you see why you guys sound nuts? You keep changing what you're outraged about.

And we've been over this. Nobody from the FBI is authorized to talk about the investigation. So any "news" you get about it is just speculation. Your three sources don't mean crap.
The latest revelation about the influence-peddling would be front page news in the MSM if we were talking about a Republican. The money didn't just go to the Foundation. A million of it went into Bill's pocket.
 
Jesus Christ. Now this has turned into a conspiracy over the Clinton Foundation? I thought this was about her time as SOS? Do you see why you guys sound nuts? You keep changing what you're outraged about.

And we've been over this. Nobody from the FBI is authorized to talk about the investigation. So any "news" you get about it is just speculation. Your three sources don't mean crap.

So when Hillary was SOS, you would not have a problem if she had taken money from foreign governments, say Saudia Arabia, for the Clinton Foundation.then in return Saudia Arabia, gets a special accommodation? Sounds kind of like a bribe to me.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT